Efficacy and safety of laser-assisted techniques in orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Shahtajarab Mohammad Saltanat, Mohammed Shahrian Millat, Ramy Elemam, George Ekanem
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of laser-assisted techniques in orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Shahtajarab Mohammad Saltanat, Mohammed Shahrian Millat, Ramy Elemam, George Ekanem","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04416-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In orthopedic surgery, laser-assisted procedures have shown great promise as adjuncts, with the potential to enhance patient outcomes, decrease tissue damage, and increase precision. However, a thorough evaluation of their safety and effectiveness is essential. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to thoroughly assess the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to ascertain the possible dangers and clinical advantages of using laser-assisted techniques during orthopedic procedures. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, covering publications until April 2024. RCTs evaluating laser-assisted techniques in orthopedic surgery were included if they reported on operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, functional outcomes, complication rates, or patient satisfaction. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analyzed using SPSS software. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-three RCTs, involving a total of 2,032 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Laser-assisted techniques significantly reduced operative time (MD - 15.32 min; 95% CI - 22.45 to - 8.19; p < 0.001) and postoperative pain (MD - 1.27; 95% CI - 1.91 to - 0.63; p < 0.001). Although the reduction in blood loss did not reach statistical significance (MD - 52.18 mL; 95% CI - 114.32 to 9.96; p = 0.10), the trend suggested potential benefits. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were significantly improved, while complication rates were comparable to conventional methods (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.17; p = 0.84). Publication bias was assessed and found to be minimal. Significant decreases in operating time and postoperative pain, as well as enhanced patient satisfaction and functional results, are linked to laser-assisted orthopedic surgery procedures. The trend points to a possible benefit even though the decrease in blood loss was not statistically significant. These results demonstrate the advantages and safety of laser technology and justify its use in orthopedic surgery. To standardize procedures and improve these methods in various surgical settings, more study is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04416-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In orthopedic surgery, laser-assisted procedures have shown great promise as adjuncts, with the potential to enhance patient outcomes, decrease tissue damage, and increase precision. However, a thorough evaluation of their safety and effectiveness is essential. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to thoroughly assess the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to ascertain the possible dangers and clinical advantages of using laser-assisted techniques during orthopedic procedures. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, covering publications until April 2024. RCTs evaluating laser-assisted techniques in orthopedic surgery were included if they reported on operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, functional outcomes, complication rates, or patient satisfaction. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analyzed using SPSS software. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-three RCTs, involving a total of 2,032 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Laser-assisted techniques significantly reduced operative time (MD - 15.32 min; 95% CI - 22.45 to - 8.19; p < 0.001) and postoperative pain (MD - 1.27; 95% CI - 1.91 to - 0.63; p < 0.001). Although the reduction in blood loss did not reach statistical significance (MD - 52.18 mL; 95% CI - 114.32 to 9.96; p = 0.10), the trend suggested potential benefits. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were significantly improved, while complication rates were comparable to conventional methods (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.17; p = 0.84). Publication bias was assessed and found to be minimal. Significant decreases in operating time and postoperative pain, as well as enhanced patient satisfaction and functional results, are linked to laser-assisted orthopedic surgery procedures. The trend points to a possible benefit even though the decrease in blood loss was not statistically significant. These results demonstrate the advantages and safety of laser technology and justify its use in orthopedic surgery. To standardize procedures and improve these methods in various surgical settings, more study is required.

激光辅助技术在骨科手术中的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
在骨科手术中,激光辅助手术作为辅助手段已经显示出巨大的前景,具有提高患者预后、减少组织损伤和提高精度的潜力。然而,对它们的安全性和有效性进行彻底的评估是必不可少的。本荟萃分析的目的是全面评估随机对照试验(rct)的数据,以确定在骨科手术中使用激光辅助技术的可能危险和临床优势。我们对PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science进行了全面的文献检索,涵盖了截至2024年4月的出版物。评估激光辅助技术在骨科手术中的应用的随机对照试验包括手术时间、出血量、术后疼痛、功能结局、并发症发生率或患者满意度。数据由两名独立审稿人提取,并使用SPSS软件进行分析。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。23项随机对照试验,共涉及2032例患者,符合纳入标准。激光辅助技术显著缩短手术时间(MD - 15.32 min;95% CI - 22.45 ~ - 8.19;p < 0.001)和术后疼痛(MD - 1.27;95% CI - 1.91至- 0.63;P < 0.001)。虽然出血量的减少没有达到统计学意义(MD - 52.18 mL;95% CI - 114.32 - 9.96;P = 0.10),这一趋势表明了潜在的益处。功能结局和患者满意度显著改善,并发症发生率与常规方法相当(RR 0.98;95% CI 0.82 ~ 1.17;P = 0.84)。对发表偏倚进行了评估,发现其最小。手术时间和术后疼痛的显著减少,以及患者满意度和功能结果的提高,与激光辅助骨科手术程序有关。尽管失血量的减少在统计上并不显著,但这一趋势表明可能有好处。这些结果证明了激光技术的优点和安全性,并证明了其在骨科手术中的应用。为了在不同的手术环境中规范程序和改进这些方法,需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信