Navacaprant, a Novel and Highly Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist, in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Sanjay J Mathew, Andrew J Cutler, Nicole C Visitacion, Michael Gold, Jason Yuan, Bill Aurora
{"title":"Navacaprant, a Novel and Highly Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist, in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sanjay J Mathew, Andrew J Cutler, Nicole C Visitacion, Michael Gold, Jason Yuan, Bill Aurora","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/background: </strong>This phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial assessed the efficacy and safety of navacaprant, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods/procedures: </strong>Participants with 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores of 14 to 30 were randomized 1:1 to once-daily navacaprant 80 mg or placebo (n = 102 each). The primary endpoint was HAMD-17 change from baseline (CFB) to week 8. Secondary endpoints included CFB in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). No adjustment for multiple comparisons was made.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>At week 8, HAMD-17 CFB was not statistically significantly improved with navacaprant vs placebo (least squares mean difference -1.7 [standard error, 1.08], P = 0.121; mixed-models repeated-measures) in the efficacy population. In a prespecified sensitivity analysis using last-observation-carried-forward, navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB (-2.9 [0.88], P = 0.002; -2.2 [0.98], P = 0.024) and SHAPS CFB (-2.8 [0.96], P = 0.004; -3.4 [1.10], P = 0.002) vs placebo at weeks 4 and 8. In the prespecified subgroup with moderate-to-severe MDD (baseline HAMD-17 score ≥22; n = 100), navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB at both timepoints (-3.0 [1.20], P = 0.015; -2.8 [1.33], P = 0.037) and SHAPS CFB at week 8 (-4.8 [1.35], P = 0.001) vs placebo. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included headache (4.9% both) and nausea (4.9% navacaprant, 1.0% placebo); no serious AEs were reported with navacaprant.</p><p><strong>Implications/conclusions: </strong>Although the primary endpoint was not met in the efficacy population, which included participants with mild depression, statistically significant improvements with navacaprant on depressive symptoms including anhedonia in the moderate-to-severe MDD subgroup, along with a favorable safety profile, support further study of navacaprant for the treatment of MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose/background: This phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial assessed the efficacy and safety of navacaprant, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Methods/procedures: Participants with 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores of 14 to 30 were randomized 1:1 to once-daily navacaprant 80 mg or placebo (n = 102 each). The primary endpoint was HAMD-17 change from baseline (CFB) to week 8. Secondary endpoints included CFB in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). No adjustment for multiple comparisons was made.
Findings/results: At week 8, HAMD-17 CFB was not statistically significantly improved with navacaprant vs placebo (least squares mean difference -1.7 [standard error, 1.08], P = 0.121; mixed-models repeated-measures) in the efficacy population. In a prespecified sensitivity analysis using last-observation-carried-forward, navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB (-2.9 [0.88], P = 0.002; -2.2 [0.98], P = 0.024) and SHAPS CFB (-2.8 [0.96], P = 0.004; -3.4 [1.10], P = 0.002) vs placebo at weeks 4 and 8. In the prespecified subgroup with moderate-to-severe MDD (baseline HAMD-17 score ≥22; n = 100), navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB at both timepoints (-3.0 [1.20], P = 0.015; -2.8 [1.33], P = 0.037) and SHAPS CFB at week 8 (-4.8 [1.35], P = 0.001) vs placebo. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included headache (4.9% both) and nausea (4.9% navacaprant, 1.0% placebo); no serious AEs were reported with navacaprant.
Implications/conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met in the efficacy population, which included participants with mild depression, statistically significant improvements with navacaprant on depressive symptoms including anhedonia in the moderate-to-severe MDD subgroup, along with a favorable safety profile, support further study of navacaprant for the treatment of MDD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.