Navacaprant, a Novel and Highly Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist, in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sanjay J Mathew, Andrew J Cutler, Nicole C Visitacion, Michael Gold, Jason Yuan, Bill Aurora
{"title":"Navacaprant, a Novel and Highly Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist, in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 2 Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sanjay J Mathew, Andrew J Cutler, Nicole C Visitacion, Michael Gold, Jason Yuan, Bill Aurora","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/background: </strong>This phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial assessed the efficacy and safety of navacaprant, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods/procedures: </strong>Participants with 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores of 14 to 30 were randomized 1:1 to once-daily navacaprant 80 mg or placebo (n = 102 each). The primary endpoint was HAMD-17 change from baseline (CFB) to week 8. Secondary endpoints included CFB in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). No adjustment for multiple comparisons was made.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>At week 8, HAMD-17 CFB was not statistically significantly improved with navacaprant vs placebo (least squares mean difference -1.7 [standard error, 1.08], P = 0.121; mixed-models repeated-measures) in the efficacy population. In a prespecified sensitivity analysis using last-observation-carried-forward, navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB (-2.9 [0.88], P = 0.002; -2.2 [0.98], P = 0.024) and SHAPS CFB (-2.8 [0.96], P = 0.004; -3.4 [1.10], P = 0.002) vs placebo at weeks 4 and 8. In the prespecified subgroup with moderate-to-severe MDD (baseline HAMD-17 score ≥22; n = 100), navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB at both timepoints (-3.0 [1.20], P = 0.015; -2.8 [1.33], P = 0.037) and SHAPS CFB at week 8 (-4.8 [1.35], P = 0.001) vs placebo. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included headache (4.9% both) and nausea (4.9% navacaprant, 1.0% placebo); no serious AEs were reported with navacaprant.</p><p><strong>Implications/conclusions: </strong>Although the primary endpoint was not met in the efficacy population, which included participants with mild depression, statistically significant improvements with navacaprant on depressive symptoms including anhedonia in the moderate-to-severe MDD subgroup, along with a favorable safety profile, support further study of navacaprant for the treatment of MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/background: This phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial assessed the efficacy and safety of navacaprant, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods/procedures: Participants with 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) scores of 14 to 30 were randomized 1:1 to once-daily navacaprant 80 mg or placebo (n = 102 each). The primary endpoint was HAMD-17 change from baseline (CFB) to week 8. Secondary endpoints included CFB in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). No adjustment for multiple comparisons was made.

Findings/results: At week 8, HAMD-17 CFB was not statistically significantly improved with navacaprant vs placebo (least squares mean difference -1.7 [standard error, 1.08], P = 0.121; mixed-models repeated-measures) in the efficacy population. In a prespecified sensitivity analysis using last-observation-carried-forward, navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB (-2.9 [0.88], P = 0.002; -2.2 [0.98], P = 0.024) and SHAPS CFB (-2.8 [0.96], P = 0.004; -3.4 [1.10], P = 0.002) vs placebo at weeks 4 and 8. In the prespecified subgroup with moderate-to-severe MDD (baseline HAMD-17 score ≥22; n = 100), navacaprant statistically significantly improved HAMD-17 CFB at both timepoints (-3.0 [1.20], P = 0.015; -2.8 [1.33], P = 0.037) and SHAPS CFB at week 8 (-4.8 [1.35], P = 0.001) vs placebo. Most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) included headache (4.9% both) and nausea (4.9% navacaprant, 1.0% placebo); no serious AEs were reported with navacaprant.

Implications/conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met in the efficacy population, which included participants with mild depression, statistically significant improvements with navacaprant on depressive symptoms including anhedonia in the moderate-to-severe MDD subgroup, along with a favorable safety profile, support further study of navacaprant for the treatment of MDD.

navacapant,一种新型高选择性阿片受体拮抗剂,用于成人重度抑郁症:一项随机、双盲2期临床试验
目的/背景:这项为期8周的2a期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验评估了navacapant(一种高度选择性阿片受体拮抗剂)对重度抑郁症(MDD)成人患者的疗效和安全性。方法/程序:17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)得分为14至30分的参与者按1:1随机分配至每日一次的navacaprant 80 mg或安慰剂(n = 102)。主要终点是HAMD-17从基线(CFB)到第8周的变化。次要终点包括snith - hamilton快乐量表(SHAPS)中的CFB。未对多重比较进行调整。研究结果/结果:在第8周,navacapant与安慰剂相比,HAMD-17 CFB没有统计学意义上的显著改善(最小二乘平均差-1.7[标准误差,1.08],P = 0.121;混合模型(重复测量)。在预先指定的灵敏度分析中,使用最后观察结转,navacapant统计学上显著改善HAMD-17 CFB (-2.9 [0.88], P = 0.002;-2.2 [0.98], P = 0.024)和世鹏科技电子循环流化床(-2.8 [0.96],P = 0.004;-3.4 [1.10], P = 0.002)与安慰剂在第4周和第8周。在预先指定的中重度重度重度抑郁症亚组中(基线HAMD-17评分≥22;n = 100), navacapant在两个时间点均显著改善HAMD-17 CFB (-3.0 [1.20], P = 0.015;-2.8 [1.33], P = 0.037)和SHAPS CFB在第8周(-4.8 [1.35],P = 0.001)。最常见的不良事件(ae)包括头痛(两者均为4.9%)和恶心(navacaprant为4.9%,安慰剂为1.0%);navacaprant未见严重不良反应。含义/结论:虽然在包括轻度抑郁症患者在内的疗效人群中没有达到主要终点,但纳伐帕rant对中度至重度重度重度抑郁症亚组抑郁症状(包括快感缺乏)的统计学显著改善,以及良好的安全性,支持纳伐帕rant治疗重度抑郁症的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信