Feasibility Analysis of Ultra-Resolution Microscopy Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Peng-Fei Sun, Li-Xue Zhai, Yun-Yun Dong, Xiang-Dong Hu, Min Li, Lin-Xue Qian, Jun-Feng Zhao
{"title":"Feasibility Analysis of Ultra-Resolution Microscopy Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.","authors":"Peng-Fei Sun, Li-Xue Zhai, Yun-Yun Dong, Xiang-Dong Hu, Min Li, Lin-Xue Qian, Jun-Feng Zhao","doi":"10.1002/jum.16699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic value of quantitative analysis using ultra-resolution microscopy (URM) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 60 patients with 60 breast lesions who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using SonoVue (Bracco Imaging, Italy) between June 2024 and August 2024. Quantitative parameters of microvascular density and velocity maps were generated for the lesion interior, rim region, and combined interior and rim area using URM software on CEUS images. The parameters were analyzed for differences between benign and malignant breast lesions, and their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis indicated that breast malignancy was associated with microvascular ratio and complexity level. The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined diagnostic method that included microvascular parameters at the lesion margin (Rim group) and BI-RADS classification + Rim was higher than other diagnostic approaches (AUC = 0.92), although there was no significant difference when compared with the combined approach of evaluating parameters within the lesion and at the margin alongside BI-RADS (Mass + Rim + BI-RADS group, P = .293). The BI-RADS group showed high sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%); the Mass group (parameters within the lesion) demonstrated higher sensitivity (87.0%), and the Rim group (parameters at the lesion margin) exhibited the highest specificity (91.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>URM shows potential in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions, offering a precise assessment of lesion hemodynamics and providing valuable information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of quantitative analysis using ultra-resolution microscopy (URM) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.

Material and methods: This prospective study enrolled 60 patients with 60 breast lesions who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using SonoVue (Bracco Imaging, Italy) between June 2024 and August 2024. Quantitative parameters of microvascular density and velocity maps were generated for the lesion interior, rim region, and combined interior and rim area using URM software on CEUS images. The parameters were analyzed for differences between benign and malignant breast lesions, and their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.

Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that breast malignancy was associated with microvascular ratio and complexity level. The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined diagnostic method that included microvascular parameters at the lesion margin (Rim group) and BI-RADS classification + Rim was higher than other diagnostic approaches (AUC = 0.92), although there was no significant difference when compared with the combined approach of evaluating parameters within the lesion and at the margin alongside BI-RADS (Mass + Rim + BI-RADS group, P = .293). The BI-RADS group showed high sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%); the Mass group (parameters within the lesion) demonstrated higher sensitivity (87.0%), and the Rim group (parameters at the lesion margin) exhibited the highest specificity (91.9%).

Conclusion: URM shows potential in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions, offering a precise assessment of lesion hemodynamics and providing valuable information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信