Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.32
Tabia Henry Akintobi, Rhonda Holliday, LaShawn Hoffman, Latrice Rollins, Yvette Daniels, Howard Grant, Melissa Kottke
{"title":"Contextualizing barriers and facilitators to scaling community-engaged research transformation at a historically black medical school.","authors":"Tabia Henry Akintobi, Rhonda Holliday, LaShawn Hoffman, Latrice Rollins, Yvette Daniels, Howard Grant, Melissa Kottke","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) embodies an applied definition of community engagement advanced over four decades. The increased demand for community collaboration requires attention to the <i>institutional contexts</i> supporting community-engaged research. MSM partnered with the University of New Mexico Center for Participatory Research for the Engage for Equity (E2) PLUS Project to assess, ideate, and consider existing and recommended institutional supports for community-engaged research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSM assembled a community-campus Champion Team. The team coordinated virtual workshops with 18 community and academic research partners, facilitated four interviews of executive leaders and two focus groups (researchers/research staff and patients/community members, respectively) moderated by UNM-CPR. Analyses of the transcripts were conducted using an inductive and deductive process. Once the themes were identified, the qualitative summaries were shared with the Champion Team to verify and discuss implications for action and institutional improvements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Institutional strengths and opportunities for systemic change were aligned with equity indicators (power and control, decision-making, and influence) and contextual factors (history, trust, and relationship building) of The continuum of community engagement in research. Institutional advances include community-engagement added as the fourth pillar of the institution's strategic plan. Action strategies include 1) development a research navigation system to address community-campus research partnership administrative challenges and 2) an academy to build the capacities of community/patient partners to <i>independently</i> acquire, manage, and sustain grants and negotiate equity in dissemination of research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MSM has leveraged E2 PLUS to identify systems improvements necessary to ensure that community/patient-centered research and partnerships are amplified and sustained.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) embodies an applied definition of community engagement advanced over four decades. The increased demand for community collaboration requires attention to the institutional contexts supporting community-engaged research. MSM partnered with the University of New Mexico Center for Participatory Research for the Engage for Equity (E2) PLUS Project to assess, ideate, and consider existing and recommended institutional supports for community-engaged research.

Methods: MSM assembled a community-campus Champion Team. The team coordinated virtual workshops with 18 community and academic research partners, facilitated four interviews of executive leaders and two focus groups (researchers/research staff and patients/community members, respectively) moderated by UNM-CPR. Analyses of the transcripts were conducted using an inductive and deductive process. Once the themes were identified, the qualitative summaries were shared with the Champion Team to verify and discuss implications for action and institutional improvements.

Results: Institutional strengths and opportunities for systemic change were aligned with equity indicators (power and control, decision-making, and influence) and contextual factors (history, trust, and relationship building) of The continuum of community engagement in research. Institutional advances include community-engagement added as the fourth pillar of the institution's strategic plan. Action strategies include 1) development a research navigation system to address community-campus research partnership administrative challenges and 2) an academy to build the capacities of community/patient partners to independently acquire, manage, and sustain grants and negotiate equity in dissemination of research.

Conclusions: MSM has leveraged E2 PLUS to identify systems improvements necessary to ensure that community/patient-centered research and partnerships are amplified and sustained.

在历史悠久的黑人医学院扩大社区参与研究转型的背景障碍和促进因素。
简介:莫尔豪斯医学院(MSM)体现了四十多年来对社区参与的应用定义。对社区合作需求的增加要求关注支持社区参与研究的制度背景。MSM与新墨西哥大学参与研究中心合作,参与公平参与(E2) PLUS项目,以评估、构思和考虑现有的和建议的机构支持社区参与研究。方法:组建社区-校园冠军队伍。该小组与18个社区和学术研究伙伴协调了虚拟讲习班,促进了执行领导人的四次访谈和两个焦点小组(分别是研究人员/研究人员和患者/社区成员),由新墨西哥州大学心肺复苏中心主持。使用归纳和演绎过程对转录本进行了分析。一旦确定了主题,就与冠军团队分享定性摘要,以验证和讨论对行动和机构改进的影响。结果:制度优势和系统性变革的机会与研究中社区参与连续体的公平指标(权力和控制、决策和影响)和背景因素(历史、信任和关系建立)一致。制度上的进步包括增加社区参与,作为该机构战略计划的第四个支柱。行动战略包括:1)开发一个研究导航系统,以解决社区-校园研究伙伴关系的管理挑战;2)建立一个学院,以建立社区/患者合作伙伴独立获取、管理和维持资助的能力,并在研究传播中进行公平谈判。结论:男男性行为者利用E2 PLUS来确定必要的系统改进,以确保扩大和维持以社区/患者为中心的研究和伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信