Ask the experts: Community Engagement studios to inform research on cannabis use in cancer symptom management.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10
Brittney Greene, Grace Mckenzie, Keenan Gibbons, Salimah H Meghani, Brooke Worster, Rebecca L Ashare
{"title":"Ask the experts: Community Engagement studios to inform research on cannabis use in cancer symptom management.","authors":"Brittney Greene, Grace Mckenzie, Keenan Gibbons, Salimah H Meghani, Brooke Worster, Rebecca L Ashare","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite one-third of patients with cancer using cannabis for symptom management, little is known about their access to and usage of cannabis. Community Engagement (CE) studios involving community experts with chronic health conditions were used to inform a qualitative study on access to and use of cannabis products among patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted two 2-hour CE studios with residents from Western NY (WNY) (<i>N</i> = 18). Our sample primarily included White and Black residents (56% vs. 39%). After a researcher-led 10-minute presentation, a community facilitator led the discussion, which focused on questions about challenges to cannabis use, recommendations for providers when discussing cannabis with patients, and community factors influencing use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Community experts reported that state legalization of cannabis made it easier to access cannabis, but the costs of cannabis and distance to dispensaries hindered their ability to obtain it. Discrimination was also a key barrier to medical cannabis receipt. There were differences in the perceived safety of where to obtain cannabis (dispensaries vs. friends). Community experts wanted providers to be more informed and less biased about recommending cannabis. Community experts recommended conducting focus groups for the subsequent study to ask questions about cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CE studios encouraged us to switch formats from qualitative interviews to focus groups and provided guidance on question topics for the subsequent study. Incorporating community expert's feedback through CE studios is an effective strategy to design more impactful studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Despite one-third of patients with cancer using cannabis for symptom management, little is known about their access to and usage of cannabis. Community Engagement (CE) studios involving community experts with chronic health conditions were used to inform a qualitative study on access to and use of cannabis products among patients with cancer.

Method: We conducted two 2-hour CE studios with residents from Western NY (WNY) (N = 18). Our sample primarily included White and Black residents (56% vs. 39%). After a researcher-led 10-minute presentation, a community facilitator led the discussion, which focused on questions about challenges to cannabis use, recommendations for providers when discussing cannabis with patients, and community factors influencing use.

Results: Community experts reported that state legalization of cannabis made it easier to access cannabis, but the costs of cannabis and distance to dispensaries hindered their ability to obtain it. Discrimination was also a key barrier to medical cannabis receipt. There were differences in the perceived safety of where to obtain cannabis (dispensaries vs. friends). Community experts wanted providers to be more informed and less biased about recommending cannabis. Community experts recommended conducting focus groups for the subsequent study to ask questions about cannabis use.

Conclusion: The CE studios encouraged us to switch formats from qualitative interviews to focus groups and provided guidance on question topics for the subsequent study. Incorporating community expert's feedback through CE studios is an effective strategy to design more impactful studies.

咨询专家:社区参与工作室为癌症症状管理中的大麻使用研究提供信息。
目的:尽管三分之一的癌症患者使用大麻进行症状管理,但对他们获得和使用大麻的情况知之甚少。有慢性病社区专家参与的社区参与工作室为癌症患者获得和使用大麻产品的定性研究提供了信息。方法:我们与来自纽约州西部(WNY)的居民(N = 18)进行了两次2小时的CE工作室。我们的样本主要包括白人和黑人居民(56%对39%)。在由研究人员主持的10分钟发言之后,一名社区协调员主持了讨论,讨论的重点是关于大麻使用面临的挑战、在与患者讨论大麻时对提供者的建议以及影响大麻使用的社区因素等问题。结果:社区专家报告说,国家大麻合法化使人们更容易获得大麻,但大麻的成本和离药房的距离阻碍了他们获得大麻的能力。歧视也是获得医用大麻的一个主要障碍。在何处获得大麻(药房与朋友)的感知安全性方面存在差异。社区专家希望供应商在推荐大麻时更加知情,减少偏见。社区专家建议为后续研究开展焦点小组,询问有关大麻使用的问题。结论:CE工作室鼓励我们从定性访谈转变为焦点小组访谈,并为后续研究提供问题主题指导。通过CE工作室整合社区专家的反馈是设计更具影响力的研究的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信