Key informants' perspectives on integrating community health workers into palliative care teams.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.660
Taleaa Masroor, Shannon Fuller, Olivia Monton, Mahtab Vasigh, Alison P Woods, Amn Siddiqi, Tracy B Malone, Robert Joyner, Ronit Elk, Jill Owczarzak, Fabian M Johnston
{"title":"Key informants' perspectives on integrating community health workers into palliative care teams.","authors":"Taleaa Masroor, Shannon Fuller, Olivia Monton, Mahtab Vasigh, Alison P Woods, Amn Siddiqi, Tracy B Malone, Robert Joyner, Ronit Elk, Jill Owczarzak, Fabian M Johnston","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disparities in access to palliative care persist, particularly among underserved populations. We elicited recommendations for integrating community health workers (CHWs) into clinical care teams, by exploring perspectives on potential barriers and facilitators, ultimately aiming to facilitate equitable access to palliative care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-five stakeholders were recruited for semi-structured interviews through purposive snowball sampling at three enrollment sites in the USA. Interviews were conducted to understand perspectives on the implementation of a CHW palliative care intervention for African American patients with advanced cancer. After transcription, primary and secondary coding were conducted. Framework analysis was utilized to refine the data, clarify themes, and generate recommendations for integrating CHWs into palliative care teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample comprised 25 key informants, including 6 palliative care providers, 6 oncologists, 5 cancer center leaders, 2 cancer care navigators, and 6 CHWs. Thematic analysis revealed five domains of recommendations: (1) increasing awareness and understanding of the CHW role, (2) improving communication and collaboration, (3) ensuring access to resources, (4) enhancing CHW training, and (5) ensuring leadership support for integration. Informants shared barriers, facilitators, and recommendations within each domain based on their experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers to CHW integration within palliative care teams included limited awareness of the CHW role and inadequate training opportunities, alongside practical and logistical challenges. Conversely, promoting CHW engagement, providing adequate training, and ensuring support from leadership have the potential to aid integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Disparities in access to palliative care persist, particularly among underserved populations. We elicited recommendations for integrating community health workers (CHWs) into clinical care teams, by exploring perspectives on potential barriers and facilitators, ultimately aiming to facilitate equitable access to palliative care.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five stakeholders were recruited for semi-structured interviews through purposive snowball sampling at three enrollment sites in the USA. Interviews were conducted to understand perspectives on the implementation of a CHW palliative care intervention for African American patients with advanced cancer. After transcription, primary and secondary coding were conducted. Framework analysis was utilized to refine the data, clarify themes, and generate recommendations for integrating CHWs into palliative care teams.

Results: Our sample comprised 25 key informants, including 6 palliative care providers, 6 oncologists, 5 cancer center leaders, 2 cancer care navigators, and 6 CHWs. Thematic analysis revealed five domains of recommendations: (1) increasing awareness and understanding of the CHW role, (2) improving communication and collaboration, (3) ensuring access to resources, (4) enhancing CHW training, and (5) ensuring leadership support for integration. Informants shared barriers, facilitators, and recommendations within each domain based on their experiences.

Conclusion: Barriers to CHW integration within palliative care teams included limited awareness of the CHW role and inadequate training opportunities, alongside practical and logistical challenges. Conversely, promoting CHW engagement, providing adequate training, and ensuring support from leadership have the potential to aid integration.

关键举报人关于将社区卫生工作者纳入姑息治疗团队的观点。
导言:在获得姑息治疗方面的差距仍然存在,特别是在服务不足的人群中。通过探索潜在障碍和促进因素的观点,我们得出了将社区卫生工作者(chw)纳入临床护理团队的建议,最终目的是促进公平获得姑息治疗。材料和方法:通过有目的的滚雪球抽样,在美国的三个登记点招募了25名利益相关者进行半结构化访谈。访谈是为了了解对非裔美国晚期癌症患者实施CHW姑息治疗干预的观点。转录完成后进行一级编码和二级编码。使用框架分析来完善数据,阐明主题,并为将chw纳入姑息治疗团队提出建议。结果:我们的样本包括25名关键信息提供者,包括6名姑息治疗提供者、6名肿瘤学家、5名癌症中心负责人、2名癌症护理导航员和6名chw。专题分析揭示了五个建议领域:(1)提高对CHW作用的认识和理解,(2)改善沟通和协作,(3)确保获得资源,(4)加强CHW培训,(5)确保领导层支持整合。信息者根据他们的经验在每个领域内分享障碍、促进因素和建议。结论:姑息治疗团队整合CHW的障碍包括对CHW角色的认识有限,培训机会不足,以及实践和后勤方面的挑战。相反,促进CHW的参与,提供充分的培训,并确保领导层的支持有可能帮助整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信