Efficacy of Hyoscine N-butyl Bromide on Cervical Dilatation Prior to Hysteroscopy Procedure: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Maryam Sadat Hosseini, Farah Farzaneh, Hanieh Najafiarab, Saba Bazzazi
{"title":"Efficacy of Hyoscine N-butyl Bromide on Cervical Dilatation Prior to Hysteroscopy Procedure: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maryam Sadat Hosseini, Farah Farzaneh, Hanieh Najafiarab, Saba Bazzazi","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2028815.1687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the high prevalence of intrauterine pathologies, postmenopausal women are more eligible for hysteroscopy procedure. Cervical dilatation is always a major challenge for performing hysteroscopy. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of vaginal Hyoscine N-butylbromide (HBB) on cervical dilatation prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on postmenopausal women who were scheduled for hysteroscopy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned with a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention (received 20 mg HBB vaginally two hours prior to hysteroscopy) and control (did not receive HBB) groups. As the study outcomes, pre-hysteroscopy cervical dilatation (based on the passage of the dilator number 4 through the cervical canal) and the adverse event consequences were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 128 postmenopausal women who were eligible for hysteroscopy were included in the study, with 64 individuals in each group. The percentage of cervical dilatation in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (100 vs. 70.3%, P<0.001). Furthermore, none of the adverse event consequences differed significantly between the intervention and control groups: bleeding (3.1 vs. 3.1%, P>0.999), nausea and vomiting (4.7 vs. 0%, P=0.244), dry mouth (3.1 vs. 0%, P=0.496), dizziness (0 vs. 0%), and headache (0 vs. 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, vaginal HBB is effective without any significant side effects in cervical dilation of postmenopausal women (registration number: IRCT20220822055772N1).</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"19 2","pages":"172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2028815.1687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the high prevalence of intrauterine pathologies, postmenopausal women are more eligible for hysteroscopy procedure. Cervical dilatation is always a major challenge for performing hysteroscopy. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of vaginal Hyoscine N-butylbromide (HBB) on cervical dilatation prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women.

Materials and methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on postmenopausal women who were scheduled for hysteroscopy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned with a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention (received 20 mg HBB vaginally two hours prior to hysteroscopy) and control (did not receive HBB) groups. As the study outcomes, pre-hysteroscopy cervical dilatation (based on the passage of the dilator number 4 through the cervical canal) and the adverse event consequences were compared between the two groups.

Results: Overall, 128 postmenopausal women who were eligible for hysteroscopy were included in the study, with 64 individuals in each group. The percentage of cervical dilatation in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (100 vs. 70.3%, P<0.001). Furthermore, none of the adverse event consequences differed significantly between the intervention and control groups: bleeding (3.1 vs. 3.1%, P>0.999), nausea and vomiting (4.7 vs. 0%, P=0.244), dry mouth (3.1 vs. 0%, P=0.496), dizziness (0 vs. 0%), and headache (0 vs. 0%).

Conclusion: Based on the findings, vaginal HBB is effective without any significant side effects in cervical dilation of postmenopausal women (registration number: IRCT20220822055772N1).

宫腔镜手术前宫颈扩张术中溴化 N-丁基次莨菪碱的疗效:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
背景:由于宫内病变的高发,绝经后妇女更适合宫腔镜手术。宫颈扩张一直是宫腔镜检查的主要挑战。本研究旨在确定阴道海莨菪碱n -丁基溴(HBB)对绝经后妇女宫腔镜检查前宫颈扩张的疗效。材料和方法:这项开放标签随机对照试验是对绝经后妇女进行宫腔镜检查。符合条件的患者按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组(宫腔镜检查前2小时阴道接受20 mg HBB)和对照组(未接受HBB)。作为研究结果,比较两组宫腔镜前宫颈扩张(基于4号扩张器通过宫颈管)和不良事件后果。结果:总体而言,128名符合宫腔镜检查条件的绝经后妇女被纳入研究,每组64人。干预组宫颈扩张率(100比70.3%,P0.999)、恶心呕吐率(4.7比0%,P=0.244)、口干率(3.1比0%,P=0.496)、头晕率(0比0%)、头痛率(0比0%)均显著高于对照组(P= 0.999)。结论:根据研究结果,阴道HBB对绝经后妇女宫颈扩张有效,无明显副作用(注册号:IRCT20220822055772N1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信