An interprofessional model for training the next generation of physician-researchers.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.42
Susan Budinger, Theodore Snyderman, Christine Deeter, Camila Reyes, Joan Wilson, Holly Tiemann, Leonor Corsino, Kathryn Andolsek, Denise C Snyder, Stephanie Freel
{"title":"An interprofessional model for training the next generation of physician-researchers.","authors":"Susan Budinger, Theodore Snyderman, Christine Deeter, Camila Reyes, Joan Wilson, Holly Tiemann, Leonor Corsino, Kathryn Andolsek, Denise C Snyder, Stephanie Freel","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential for physicians, clinicians, and health professionals to contribute to the advancement of medical therapies through clinical research is significant. Yet, a lack of exposure to, or practical training in, the conduct of clinical research can inhibit health profession trainees from considering research careers, thus perpetuating the already limited influx of new talent. To enhance the sustainability of career pathways into research for all trainees, including those from traditionally underrepresented communities, trainees must experience early exposure to research concepts through robust training and hands-on opportunities. In 2015, the Duke Office of Clinical Research created a Research Immersion elective for Duke's Master in Biomedical Sciences program, which prepares students for additional health professional training. The course trained students through didactic and practical experiences, with a unique interprofessional mentorship team including both principal investigator and clinical research professional mentors. Following eight cohorts of iterative course optimization, students' confidence increased in all 24 research competencies assessed. A cross-sectional analysis of post-course outcomes in May 2024 revealed 40.4% of students had continued in research after the program and 60.6% had continued their health professions education. We attributed this success to applied learning and clear expectations and guidelines to support the mentor-student relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential for physicians, clinicians, and health professionals to contribute to the advancement of medical therapies through clinical research is significant. Yet, a lack of exposure to, or practical training in, the conduct of clinical research can inhibit health profession trainees from considering research careers, thus perpetuating the already limited influx of new talent. To enhance the sustainability of career pathways into research for all trainees, including those from traditionally underrepresented communities, trainees must experience early exposure to research concepts through robust training and hands-on opportunities. In 2015, the Duke Office of Clinical Research created a Research Immersion elective for Duke's Master in Biomedical Sciences program, which prepares students for additional health professional training. The course trained students through didactic and practical experiences, with a unique interprofessional mentorship team including both principal investigator and clinical research professional mentors. Following eight cohorts of iterative course optimization, students' confidence increased in all 24 research competencies assessed. A cross-sectional analysis of post-course outcomes in May 2024 revealed 40.4% of students had continued in research after the program and 60.6% had continued their health professions education. We attributed this success to applied learning and clear expectations and guidelines to support the mentor-student relationship.

培养下一代医师研究人员的跨专业模式。
医生、临床医生和卫生专业人员通过临床研究为医学治疗的进步做出贡献的潜力是重要的。然而,缺乏临床研究的经验或缺乏临床研究方面的实际培训,可能会阻碍卫生专业受训人员考虑从事研究工作,从而使本已有限的新人才流入永久化。为了加强所有受训者,包括那些来自传统上代表性不足的社区的受训者进入研究的职业道路的可持续性,受训者必须通过强有力的培训和实践机会尽早接触研究概念。2015年,杜克大学临床研究办公室为杜克大学生物医学科学硕士课程开设了一门浸入式研究选修课,为学生提供额外的健康专业培训。本课程通过教学与实践相结合的方式培养学生,拥有独特的跨专业指导团队,包括首席研究员和临床研究专业导师。经过8组迭代课程优化后,学生对所有24项研究能力的信心都有所提高。2024年5月对课程结束后结果的横断面分析显示,40.4%的学生在课程结束后继续从事研究,60.6%的学生继续接受卫生专业教育。我们将这一成功归功于应用学习和明确的期望和指导方针,以支持师徒关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信