The Use of Mobile Apps in Adolescent Psychotherapy: Assessment of Psychotherapists' Perspectives.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah Wüllner, Katharin Hermenau, Tobias Hecker, Michael Siniatchkin
{"title":"The Use of Mobile Apps in Adolescent Psychotherapy: Assessment of Psychotherapists' Perspectives.","authors":"Sarah Wüllner, Katharin Hermenau, Tobias Hecker, Michael Siniatchkin","doi":"10.2196/65788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapy-accompanying mental health apps can play an important role in the psychotherapeutic treatment of adolescents. They can enhance adolescents' engagement and autonomy, provide immediate support in critical situations, and positively influence the therapeutic working alliance. Nevertheless, mental health apps are rarely used by psychotherapists. Furthermore, due to the limited or nonexistent use of apps in psychotherapy, little is known about the actual barriers and drivers affecting their integration into psychotherapists' daily routines. To better understand how mental health apps should be designed for practical use, it is essential to explore psychotherapists' perspectives on key app features and characteristics, as well as the factors influencing their integration into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze which app features and characteristics are essential for psychotherapists to use a mobile app in psychotherapy with adolescents and to identify the key drivers and barriers influencing the integration of a psychotherapeutic app from the psychotherapists' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 3 feasibility studies using Steps, a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app for adolescents, across 3 different psychotherapeutic treatment contexts: inpatient treatment, treatment in psychiatric outpatient clinics, and outpatient treatment with psychotherapists in private practice. All studies followed a qualitative quasi-experimental design. Participants provided information on their age, occupation, years of work experience, media affinity, attitudes toward psychotherapeutic apps, perceived app quality and feasibility, and the implementation process of the therapy-accompanying app. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive qualitative content analysis. A total of 40 mental health professionals participated across the 3 studies (study 1: n=18; study 2: n=13; study 3: n=9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participation and app usage rates were low across all studies. Six core features for a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app were identified: mood checks, library, reminders, goals and tasks, emergency kit, and questionnaires. Additionally, the integration of mental health apps into daily routines was influenced by various drivers and barriers. The most significant barriers included technological issues and practical constraints, such as limited time and resources. The most important driver was the perceived improvement in treatment quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, psychotherapists were generally open to using a therapy-accompanying mental health app. However, study participation and app usage remained low. As psychotherapists act as gatekeepers for patients' use of mental health apps, their needs should be prioritized in the development and implementation of such apps.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031258; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031258/details.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e65788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapy-accompanying mental health apps can play an important role in the psychotherapeutic treatment of adolescents. They can enhance adolescents' engagement and autonomy, provide immediate support in critical situations, and positively influence the therapeutic working alliance. Nevertheless, mental health apps are rarely used by psychotherapists. Furthermore, due to the limited or nonexistent use of apps in psychotherapy, little is known about the actual barriers and drivers affecting their integration into psychotherapists' daily routines. To better understand how mental health apps should be designed for practical use, it is essential to explore psychotherapists' perspectives on key app features and characteristics, as well as the factors influencing their integration into clinical practice.

Objective: This study aims to analyze which app features and characteristics are essential for psychotherapists to use a mobile app in psychotherapy with adolescents and to identify the key drivers and barriers influencing the integration of a psychotherapeutic app from the psychotherapists' perspectives.

Methods: We conducted 3 feasibility studies using Steps, a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app for adolescents, across 3 different psychotherapeutic treatment contexts: inpatient treatment, treatment in psychiatric outpatient clinics, and outpatient treatment with psychotherapists in private practice. All studies followed a qualitative quasi-experimental design. Participants provided information on their age, occupation, years of work experience, media affinity, attitudes toward psychotherapeutic apps, perceived app quality and feasibility, and the implementation process of the therapy-accompanying app. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive qualitative content analysis. A total of 40 mental health professionals participated across the 3 studies (study 1: n=18; study 2: n=13; study 3: n=9).

Results: Study participation and app usage rates were low across all studies. Six core features for a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app were identified: mood checks, library, reminders, goals and tasks, emergency kit, and questionnaires. Additionally, the integration of mental health apps into daily routines was influenced by various drivers and barriers. The most significant barriers included technological issues and practical constraints, such as limited time and resources. The most important driver was the perceived improvement in treatment quality.

Conclusions: Overall, psychotherapists were generally open to using a therapy-accompanying mental health app. However, study participation and app usage remained low. As psychotherapists act as gatekeepers for patients' use of mental health apps, their needs should be prioritized in the development and implementation of such apps.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031258; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031258/details.

青少年心理治疗中移动应用程序的使用:心理治疗师观点的评估。
背景介绍辅助治疗的心理健康应用程序在青少年心理治疗中可以发挥重要作用。它们可以提高青少年的参与度和自主性,在危急情况下提供即时支持,并对治疗工作联盟产生积极影响。然而,心理治疗师却很少使用心理健康应用程序。此外,由于应用程序在心理治疗中的使用有限或根本不存在,人们对影响其融入心理治疗师日常工作的实际障碍和驱动因素知之甚少。为了更好地了解心理健康应用程序应如何设计才能实际使用,有必要探讨心理治疗师对应用程序主要功能和特点的看法,以及影响其融入临床实践的因素:本研究旨在分析心理治疗师在青少年心理治疗中使用移动应用程序时,哪些应用程序功能和特点是必不可少的,并从心理治疗师的角度找出影响心理治疗应用程序整合的主要驱动因素和障碍:我们进行了 3 项可行性研究,在 3 种不同的心理治疗环境中使用 Steps(一款针对青少年的跨诊断治疗辅助应用程序):住院治疗、精神科门诊治疗以及私人诊所心理治疗师的门诊治疗。所有研究均采用定性准实验设计。参与者提供了他们的年龄、职业、工作年限、媒体亲和力、对心理治疗应用程序的态度、感知到的应用程序质量和可行性以及治疗辅助应用程序的实施过程等信息。定性数据采用演绎定性内容分析法进行分析。共有 40 名心理健康专业人员参与了这 3 项研究(研究 1:18 人;研究 2:13 人;研究 3:9 人):所有研究的参与率和应用程序使用率都很低。研究确定了跨诊断、辅助治疗应用程序的六项核心功能:情绪检查、资料库、提醒事项、目标和任务、应急包以及问卷调查。此外,将心理健康应用程序融入日常生活还受到各种驱动因素和障碍的影响。最主要的障碍包括技术问题和实际限制,如时间和资源有限。最重要的驱动因素是治疗质量的明显改善:总体而言,心理治疗师普遍对使用治疗辅助型心理健康应用程序持开放态度。然而,研究参与度和应用程序使用率仍然较低。由于心理治疗师是患者使用心理健康应用程序的守门人,因此在开发和实施此类应用程序时应优先考虑他们的需求:德国临床试验注册中心 DRKS00031258; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031258/details。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信