Jianping Huang, Xiangxin Li, Jingjing Wei, Chuanxin M Niu, Guanglin Li
{"title":"Performance of Two Different Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Approaches for Improving Myoelectric Prosthetic Control.","authors":"Jianping Huang, Xiangxin Li, Jingjing Wei, Chuanxin M Niu, Guanglin Li","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3558292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical approach that can produce a neural-machine interface to provide additional electromyography (EMG) signals in intuitive control of myoelectric prostheses for high-level limb amputees. Clinically, TMR interface can be built by two types of surgical protocols. The first surgical protocol is to transfer a residual nerve to a denervated targeted muscle using a nerve-to-muscle suture and another is to anastomose a residual nerve to a targeted nerve via a nerve-to-nerve suture. Currently, it still remains unknown which surgical protocol would be more suitable for their clinical applications. In this study, a comparative investigation of the two TMR protocols was conducted by using animals and their performance in reconstructing EMG signals was evaluated. For nerve-to-muscle animal model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was implanted onto denervated biceps brachii muscle and for nerve-to-nerve model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was anastomosed to the distal end of musculocutaneous nerve. Post-surgery EMG signals were collected from all the TMR animals. Our experimental results showed that the amplitudes of EMG recordings gradually increased for all the TMR animals in both the animal groups over time, but revealing an obvious difference between nerve-to-muscle and nerve-to-nerve. The signal-to-noise ratio and the centroid frequency of EMG signals in nerve-to-nerve were notably higher than those in nerve-to-muscle. These superior characteristics of the posted-EMG demonstrated that nerve-to-nerve surgical protocol would be better than nerve-to-muscle in reconstructing EMG signals. The findings of this animal study suggest that both the TMR surgical protocols could be useful in providing additional EMG signals for myoelectric control, while the nerve-to-nerve would outperform the nerve-to-muscle in the quality and the appearance of the reconstructed extra EMG signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3558292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical approach that can produce a neural-machine interface to provide additional electromyography (EMG) signals in intuitive control of myoelectric prostheses for high-level limb amputees. Clinically, TMR interface can be built by two types of surgical protocols. The first surgical protocol is to transfer a residual nerve to a denervated targeted muscle using a nerve-to-muscle suture and another is to anastomose a residual nerve to a targeted nerve via a nerve-to-nerve suture. Currently, it still remains unknown which surgical protocol would be more suitable for their clinical applications. In this study, a comparative investigation of the two TMR protocols was conducted by using animals and their performance in reconstructing EMG signals was evaluated. For nerve-to-muscle animal model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was implanted onto denervated biceps brachii muscle and for nerve-to-nerve model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was anastomosed to the distal end of musculocutaneous nerve. Post-surgery EMG signals were collected from all the TMR animals. Our experimental results showed that the amplitudes of EMG recordings gradually increased for all the TMR animals in both the animal groups over time, but revealing an obvious difference between nerve-to-muscle and nerve-to-nerve. The signal-to-noise ratio and the centroid frequency of EMG signals in nerve-to-nerve were notably higher than those in nerve-to-muscle. These superior characteristics of the posted-EMG demonstrated that nerve-to-nerve surgical protocol would be better than nerve-to-muscle in reconstructing EMG signals. The findings of this animal study suggest that both the TMR surgical protocols could be useful in providing additional EMG signals for myoelectric control, while the nerve-to-nerve would outperform the nerve-to-muscle in the quality and the appearance of the reconstructed extra EMG signals.
期刊介绍:
Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.