Needle nephroscope combined with ureteroscope via a single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy channel for the treatment of complex non-obstructing renal stones.
{"title":"Needle nephroscope combined with ureteroscope via a single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy channel for the treatment of complex non-obstructing renal stones.","authors":"Xinyu Yi, Jin Li","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of four different surgical approaches for the treatment of complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 patients with complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, who underwent surgical treatment at Xiangtan Central Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their CT values. Group 1 (CT ≥ 1,000) included 22 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with a laser for stone fragmentation and retrieval (experimental group), and 12 patients who underwent multi-standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (control group). Group 2 (CT < 1,000) included 21 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard PCNL combined with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (experimental group), and 33 patients who underwent transurethral ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (control group). The surgical variables including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance rate, and postoperative complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and <i>t</i>-test for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and preoperative white blood cell count (<i>P</i> > 0.01). In both CT ≥ 1,000 and CT < 1,000 groups, the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In the CT ≥ 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was higher, and two cases of postoperative bleeding (considered arteriovenous fistula) were managed with interventional embolization. In the CT < 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was lower, and three cases of postoperative fever (with a maximum temperature of 39.5°C) required an extended antibiotic course for 7 days before discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, a CT value ≥ 1,000 should be treated with single standard PCNL using a puncture-assisted method; a CT value < 1,000 is better treated with a combination of puncture-assisted single standard PCNL and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, with higher safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1573548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of four different surgical approaches for the treatment of complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones.
Methods: A total of 88 patients with complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, who underwent surgical treatment at Xiangtan Central Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their CT values. Group 1 (CT ≥ 1,000) included 22 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with a laser for stone fragmentation and retrieval (experimental group), and 12 patients who underwent multi-standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (control group). Group 2 (CT < 1,000) included 21 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard PCNL combined with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (experimental group), and 33 patients who underwent transurethral ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (control group). The surgical variables including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance rate, and postoperative complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and t-test for continuous data.
Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and preoperative white blood cell count (P > 0.01). In both CT ≥ 1,000 and CT < 1,000 groups, the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group (P < 0.01). In the CT ≥ 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was higher, and two cases of postoperative bleeding (considered arteriovenous fistula) were managed with interventional embolization. In the CT < 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was lower, and three cases of postoperative fever (with a maximum temperature of 39.5°C) required an extended antibiotic course for 7 days before discharge.
Conclusion: For complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, a CT value ≥ 1,000 should be treated with single standard PCNL using a puncture-assisted method; a CT value < 1,000 is better treated with a combination of puncture-assisted single standard PCNL and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, with higher safety and efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.