Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews for rehabilitation interventions in persons with amputation: a mapping synthesis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Arne Heyns, Frank-Robbrecht Dusar, Chiara Arienti, Carlotte Kiekens
{"title":"Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews for rehabilitation interventions in persons with amputation: a mapping synthesis.","authors":"Arne Heyns, Frank-Robbrecht Dusar, Chiara Arienti, Carlotte Kiekens","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review aimed to collect the current evidence from the Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) concerning interventions for rehabilitation of people with amputation, in the context of the World Health Organization - Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The Cochrane Rehabilitation team led the CSRs' search. Search strings were composed of \"amputation\" and \"rehabilitation\" and run in the Cochrane Library. We used the AMSTAR 2 to assess the methodological quality of the included CSRs. All rehabilitation-relevant data were summarized in an evidence map.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Out of the 95 CSRs found, eight related to people with amputation and rehabilitation. We found very low-certainty evidence to support the use of gabapentin in treating phantom limb pain. There was very low-certainty evidence against the use of memantine. Very low-certainty evidence showed faster wound healing, shorter time gaps from amputation to first prosthetic fit, shorter hospital stays and short-term changes in swelling after rigid dressing for people with transtibial amputations. Very low-certainty evidence revealed no difference for mobility assessment or adverse events after different forms of motor rehabilitation after transtibial amputation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence for interventions for rehabilitation after amputation is scarce and the available evidence is of very low certainty. More studies of higher quality are needed to provide evidence to ensure that people with an amputation receive the best rehabilitation possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08664-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This review aimed to collect the current evidence from the Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) concerning interventions for rehabilitation of people with amputation, in the context of the World Health Organization - Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation.

Evidence acquisition: The Cochrane Rehabilitation team led the CSRs' search. Search strings were composed of "amputation" and "rehabilitation" and run in the Cochrane Library. We used the AMSTAR 2 to assess the methodological quality of the included CSRs. All rehabilitation-relevant data were summarized in an evidence map.

Evidence synthesis: Out of the 95 CSRs found, eight related to people with amputation and rehabilitation. We found very low-certainty evidence to support the use of gabapentin in treating phantom limb pain. There was very low-certainty evidence against the use of memantine. Very low-certainty evidence showed faster wound healing, shorter time gaps from amputation to first prosthetic fit, shorter hospital stays and short-term changes in swelling after rigid dressing for people with transtibial amputations. Very low-certainty evidence revealed no difference for mobility assessment or adverse events after different forms of motor rehabilitation after transtibial amputation.

Conclusions: Evidence for interventions for rehabilitation after amputation is scarce and the available evidence is of very low certainty. More studies of higher quality are needed to provide evidence to ensure that people with an amputation receive the best rehabilitation possible.

截肢者康复干预的Cochrane系统综述:一个地图合成。
引言:本综述旨在收集Cochrane系统综述(CSRs)中有关截肢患者康复干预措施的最新证据,背景是世界卫生组织康复干预一揽子。证据获取:Cochrane康复团队领导了csr的搜索。搜索字符串由“截肢”和“康复”组成,并在科克伦图书馆中运行。我们使用AMSTAR 2来评估纳入的社会责任报告的方法学质量。所有康复相关数据汇总在证据图中。证据综合:在发现的95个csr中,有8个与截肢和康复患者有关。我们发现非常低确定性的证据支持使用加巴喷丁治疗幻肢痛。有非常不确定的证据反对使用美金刚。非常低确定性的证据表明,对于胫骨截肢患者,伤口愈合更快,从截肢到首次假肢安装的时间间隔更短,住院时间更短,僵硬敷料后肿胀的短期变化。非常低确定性的证据显示,在不同形式的经胫骨截肢后的运动康复后,活动能力评估或不良事件没有差异。结论:截肢后康复干预的证据很少,现有证据的确定性很低。需要更多高质量的研究来提供证据,以确保截肢者获得尽可能最好的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信