David Lauer, Jakub Sulženko, Hana Malíková, Ivana Štětkářová, Petr Widimský
{"title":"Advances in endovascular thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"David Lauer, Jakub Sulženko, Hana Malíková, Ivana Štětkářová, Petr Widimský","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2490538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the second leading cause of death and one of the leading causes of long-term disability globally. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionized treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO), providing 20% increase in post-stroke functional independence compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. Despite its proven efficacy, EVT is underutilized. While it is suitable for at least 15-20% of AIS patients, its mean adoption ranges from less than 1% to 7% in different areas.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review highlights key findings from pivotal randomized controlled trials and real-world data, focusing on patient selection criteria, advancements in thrombectomy devices, and procedural innovations. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Disparity in access to EVT requires strategic investments in healthcare systems and international multidisciplinary collaboration. Enhancing geographic coverage with thrombectomy-capable centers and optimizing prehospital triage systems are essential. Bridging the gap between treatment capability and real-world implementation is critical to improving global AIS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2490538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the second leading cause of death and one of the leading causes of long-term disability globally. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionized treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO), providing 20% increase in post-stroke functional independence compared to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. Despite its proven efficacy, EVT is underutilized. While it is suitable for at least 15-20% of AIS patients, its mean adoption ranges from less than 1% to 7% in different areas.
Areas covered: This review highlights key findings from pivotal randomized controlled trials and real-world data, focusing on patient selection criteria, advancements in thrombectomy devices, and procedural innovations. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Expert opinion: Disparity in access to EVT requires strategic investments in healthcare systems and international multidisciplinary collaboration. Enhancing geographic coverage with thrombectomy-capable centers and optimizing prehospital triage systems are essential. Bridging the gap between treatment capability and real-world implementation is critical to improving global AIS outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points