The effects of dose, valency, and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery in vivo.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Gillian Bonvicini, Sunitha Singh, Lisa Sandersjöö, Dag Sehlin, Stina Syvänen, Ken G Andersson
{"title":"The effects of dose, valency, and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery in vivo.","authors":"Gillian Bonvicini, Sunitha Singh, Lisa Sandersjöö, Dag Sehlin, Stina Syvänen, Ken G Andersson","doi":"10.1186/s12987-025-00643-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monovalent binding to the transferrin receptor (TfR) is considered the most efficient mode for high delivery of protein constructs across the blood-brain barrier via TfR-mediated transcytosis at therapeutic doses. However, growing evidence suggests this is not the case at lower, diagnostic doses. There is also a lack of data on how valency and affinity to TfR affect brain uptake independently since previous studies have not compared monovalent and bivalent antibodies with similar affinities regardless of valency (i.e. apparent affinity). Therefore, the aim was to evaluate the independent effects of valency and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery at different doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Affinity variants of antibody 8D3 were produced by introducing alanine point mutations into the complementarity-determining regions. Eleven Fab fragments and 29 IgGs were affinity screened against mouse TfR (mTfR). Six of each were chosen for production with a knob-into-hole design to have monovalent and bivalent TfR binders in full-length antibody format. The apparent affinity of these 12 antibodies were tested in an Sp2/0-Ag14 cell assay. The 10 nM apparent affinity set and the bivalent wild-type antibody were radiolabelled and injected into wild-type mice at a low (0.22 ± 0.03 mg/kg) or high (7.5 ± 0.43 mg/kg) dose. The biodistribution was measured in brain, blood and peripheral organs 4 h post-injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two sets of monovalent and bivalent 8D3 formats with similar mTfR apparent affinities were identified. Brain and tissue uptake was higher at the low dose than the high dose for all antibodies. At the low dose, the higher apparent affinity, bivalent antibody had higher brain uptake than either of the two lower apparent affinity antibodies. At the high dose, the monovalent antibody had higher brain uptake than the two bivalent antibodies. The peripheral distribution of the three antibodies were similar to the brain distribution at both doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Valency and apparent affinity affect brain uptake in a dose-dependent manner such that: brain uptake was affected more by apparent affinity at the low dose and by valency at the high dose. Thus, when designing constructs for TfR-mediated brain delivery, the application, and consequently the dose, are critical to consider.</p>","PeriodicalId":12321,"journal":{"name":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","volume":"22 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids and Barriers of the CNS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-025-00643-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Monovalent binding to the transferrin receptor (TfR) is considered the most efficient mode for high delivery of protein constructs across the blood-brain barrier via TfR-mediated transcytosis at therapeutic doses. However, growing evidence suggests this is not the case at lower, diagnostic doses. There is also a lack of data on how valency and affinity to TfR affect brain uptake independently since previous studies have not compared monovalent and bivalent antibodies with similar affinities regardless of valency (i.e. apparent affinity). Therefore, the aim was to evaluate the independent effects of valency and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery at different doses.

Methods: Affinity variants of antibody 8D3 were produced by introducing alanine point mutations into the complementarity-determining regions. Eleven Fab fragments and 29 IgGs were affinity screened against mouse TfR (mTfR). Six of each were chosen for production with a knob-into-hole design to have monovalent and bivalent TfR binders in full-length antibody format. The apparent affinity of these 12 antibodies were tested in an Sp2/0-Ag14 cell assay. The 10 nM apparent affinity set and the bivalent wild-type antibody were radiolabelled and injected into wild-type mice at a low (0.22 ± 0.03 mg/kg) or high (7.5 ± 0.43 mg/kg) dose. The biodistribution was measured in brain, blood and peripheral organs 4 h post-injection.

Results: Two sets of monovalent and bivalent 8D3 formats with similar mTfR apparent affinities were identified. Brain and tissue uptake was higher at the low dose than the high dose for all antibodies. At the low dose, the higher apparent affinity, bivalent antibody had higher brain uptake than either of the two lower apparent affinity antibodies. At the high dose, the monovalent antibody had higher brain uptake than the two bivalent antibodies. The peripheral distribution of the three antibodies were similar to the brain distribution at both doses.

Conclusions: Valency and apparent affinity affect brain uptake in a dose-dependent manner such that: brain uptake was affected more by apparent affinity at the low dose and by valency at the high dose. Thus, when designing constructs for TfR-mediated brain delivery, the application, and consequently the dose, are critical to consider.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: "Fluids and Barriers of the CNS" is a scholarly open access journal that specializes in the intricate world of the central nervous system's fluids and barriers, which are pivotal for the health and well-being of the human body. This journal is a peer-reviewed platform that welcomes research manuscripts exploring the full spectrum of CNS fluids and barriers, with a particular focus on their roles in both health and disease. At the heart of this journal's interest is the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a vital fluid that circulates within the brain and spinal cord, playing a multifaceted role in the normal functioning of the brain and in various neurological conditions. The journal delves into the composition, circulation, and absorption of CSF, as well as its relationship with the parenchymal interstitial fluid and the neurovascular unit at the blood-brain barrier (BBB).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信