Merve Kaya, Matthieu C A Schaddelee, Carien L Creutzberg, Judith R Kroep, Nanda Horeweg
{"title":"Efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibition in the treatment of endometrial cancer across molecular classes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Merve Kaya, Matthieu C A Schaddelee, Carien L Creutzberg, Judith R Kroep, Nanda Horeweg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown benefit in mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer. However, their efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (comprising POLE-mutated (POLEmut), p53-abnormal (p53abn), and no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) molecular classes) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, across the 4 molecular classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted across Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with manual searches of reference lists and conference websites. A total of 7 reports on 5 clinical trials were identified, with 3 included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with primary advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer (n=215), adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62) and progression-free survival (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53). In patients with p53abn endometrial cancer, no significant benefits in overall (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.22; n=135) or progression-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.70; n=326) were observed, but both were affected by significant heterogeneity. In patients with NSMP endometrial cancer, a significant benefit was observed for progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95; n=373), but no overall survival benefit (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39; n=242). Insufficient data were available for patients with POLEmut endometrial cancer (n=12), with no events reported in 2 of 3 clinical trials comprising the majority of patients (n=11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PD-(L)1 inhibition demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer. In NSMP endometrial cancer, adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy showed potential benefit, whereas in p53abn endometrial cancer, such benefit was not found. POLEmut endometrial cancer, although rare in recurrent or metastatic settings, was associated with a favorable prognosis, regardless of treatment. These findings underscore the relevance of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer and highlight the importance of prioritizing molecular analyses in clinical trials to guide personalized PD-(L)1 inhibition strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101759"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown benefit in mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer. However, their efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer (comprising POLE-mutated (POLEmut), p53-abnormal (p53abn), and no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) molecular classes) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, across the 4 molecular classes.
Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with manual searches of reference lists and conference websites. A total of 7 reports on 5 clinical trials were identified, with 3 included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed.
Results: In patients with primary advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer (n=215), adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved overall (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62) and progression-free survival (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53). In patients with p53abn endometrial cancer, no significant benefits in overall (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.22; n=135) or progression-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.70; n=326) were observed, but both were affected by significant heterogeneity. In patients with NSMP endometrial cancer, a significant benefit was observed for progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95; n=373), but no overall survival benefit (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39; n=242). Insufficient data were available for patients with POLEmut endometrial cancer (n=12), with no events reported in 2 of 3 clinical trials comprising the majority of patients (n=11).
Conclusions: PD-(L)1 inhibition demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with advanced or recurrent MMRd endometrial cancer. In NSMP endometrial cancer, adding a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy showed potential benefit, whereas in p53abn endometrial cancer, such benefit was not found. POLEmut endometrial cancer, although rare in recurrent or metastatic settings, was associated with a favorable prognosis, regardless of treatment. These findings underscore the relevance of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer and highlight the importance of prioritizing molecular analyses in clinical trials to guide personalized PD-(L)1 inhibition strategies.
目的:PD-(L)1抑制剂在错配修复缺陷(MMRd)子宫内膜癌中显示出益处。然而,它们在错配修复熟练的子宫内膜癌(包括pole突变(POLEmut), p53异常(p53abn)和无特异性分子谱(NSMP)分子类别)中的功效尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了PD-(L)1抑制剂作为单药或联合化疗的4种分子类别的疗效。方法:系统检索Embase、PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science,人工检索参考文献列表和会议网站。共纳入5项临床试验的7篇报道,其中3篇纳入meta分析。评估总生存期和无进展生存期。结果:在原发性晚期或复发性MMRd子宫内膜癌患者(n=215)中,在铂基化疗中添加PD-(L)1抑制剂显着改善了总体(HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21至0.62)和无进展生存(HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23至0.53)。在p53abn子宫内膜癌患者中,总体上没有显著的获益(HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.26至3.22;n=135)或无进展生存期(HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 ~ 1.70;N =326),但两者均存在显著异质性。在NSMP子宫内膜癌患者中,观察到无进展生存期的显著获益(HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57至0.95;n=373),但没有总生存获益(HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.63 ~ 1.39;n = 242)。POLEmut子宫内膜癌患者(n=12)的数据不足,3项临床试验中有2项包括大多数患者(n=11)没有报告事件。结论:PD-(L)1抑制对晚期或复发性MMRd子宫内膜癌患者有显著疗效。在NSMP子宫内膜癌中,在铂基化疗中加入PD-(L)1抑制剂显示出潜在的益处,而在p53abn子宫内膜癌中,没有发现这种益处。POLEmut子宫内膜癌,虽然罕见的复发或转移设置,与良好的预后相关,无论治疗。这些发现强调了子宫内膜癌分子分类的相关性,并强调了在临床试验中优先进行分子分析以指导个性化PD-(L)1抑制策略的重要性。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.