Preoperative Risk Factors of Keratometry, Myopia, Astigmatism, Age, and Sex for Myopic Regression After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction.
Garrett N Manion, Kayvon A Moin, Alex H Brown, Tyler V Olson, Guy M Kezirian, Phillip C Hoopes, Majid Moshirfar
{"title":"Preoperative Risk Factors of Keratometry, Myopia, Astigmatism, Age, and Sex for Myopic Regression After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction.","authors":"Garrett N Manion, Kayvon A Moin, Alex H Brown, Tyler V Olson, Guy M Kezirian, Phillip C Hoopes, Majid Moshirfar","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and demographic risk factors of myopic regression 1 year after corneal refractive surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 2093 patients (2781 eyes) who underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and experienced myopic regression of ≥0.5 D 1 year after surgery was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of regression at 1 year was higher in the overall SMILE group (10.1%) and steep keratometry group (9.6%) (P < 0.05). SMILE eyes with normal (9.0%) and steep corneas (18.2%) had a higher incidence of regression than those of LASIK and PRK eyes (P < 0.05). The mean magnitude of spherical equivalent (SEQ) regression for all regressed eyes was -0.63 ± 0.15 D. The overall SMILE group had a greater mean magnitude of spherical regression than the overall LASIK and PRK groups (-0.66 D vs. -0.48 D vs. -0.46 D, P < 0.05). There were no differences in cylindrical regression between any analyzed groups (P > 0.05). Female status and SEQ predicted -0.034 D [(-0.051, -0.017), P < 0.001] and -0.012 D [(-0.018, -0.006), P < 0.001] of regression, respectively. Age and preoperative Km had an odds ratio for regression of 1.033 [(1.017, 1.049), P < 0.001] and 1.109 [(1.006, 1.221), P < 0.001], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factors of myopic regression at 1 year included older age, female sex, steep corneas, and higher preoperative SEQ. SMILE had a higher incidence and greater magnitude of regression compared with LASIK and PRK.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative and demographic risk factors of myopic regression 1 year after corneal refractive surgery.
Methods: A retrospective study of 2093 patients (2781 eyes) who underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and experienced myopic regression of ≥0.5 D 1 year after surgery was conducted.
Results: The incidence of regression at 1 year was higher in the overall SMILE group (10.1%) and steep keratometry group (9.6%) (P < 0.05). SMILE eyes with normal (9.0%) and steep corneas (18.2%) had a higher incidence of regression than those of LASIK and PRK eyes (P < 0.05). The mean magnitude of spherical equivalent (SEQ) regression for all regressed eyes was -0.63 ± 0.15 D. The overall SMILE group had a greater mean magnitude of spherical regression than the overall LASIK and PRK groups (-0.66 D vs. -0.48 D vs. -0.46 D, P < 0.05). There were no differences in cylindrical regression between any analyzed groups (P > 0.05). Female status and SEQ predicted -0.034 D [(-0.051, -0.017), P < 0.001] and -0.012 D [(-0.018, -0.006), P < 0.001] of regression, respectively. Age and preoperative Km had an odds ratio for regression of 1.033 [(1.017, 1.049), P < 0.001] and 1.109 [(1.006, 1.221), P < 0.001], respectively.
Conclusions: Risk factors of myopic regression at 1 year included older age, female sex, steep corneas, and higher preoperative SEQ. SMILE had a higher incidence and greater magnitude of regression compared with LASIK and PRK.
期刊介绍:
For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references.
Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.