Integration of administrative claims and clinical data to advance real-world evidence generation in oncology.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chi Nguyen, Hanke Zheng, Michael Grabner, John Barron, Ruth Wangia Dixon, Mark Cziraky, Brian Sweet, Nathan Hill
{"title":"Integration of administrative claims and clinical data to advance real-world evidence generation in oncology.","authors":"Chi Nguyen, Hanke Zheng, Michael Grabner, John Barron, Ruth Wangia Dixon, Mark Cziraky, Brian Sweet, Nathan Hill","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate capabilities of the Generating Evidence Excellence (GEx) research environment using Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) as a use-case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with incident NSCLC were identified in GEx from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2019. Two GEx data containers were used: (1) claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) linked to clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP); (2) claims data from the HIRD and a second large commercially insured claims dataset (CD2) linked to electronic medical records from IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patient demographics and all-cause mortality were contrasted with the American Community Survey and the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) public use database. Descriptive analyses were completed <i>via</i> SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12 and SEER*stat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comprised of 6,233 (HIRD+CCQP) and 1,176 (HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) patients with NSCLC. Both GEx data containers had similar patient demographics with a mean age 63 years and 71% White, while 70% of USCS patients were ≥65 years and 85% White. Most patients resided in the South/Midwest regions of the US (74% (HIRD+CCQP) and 86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patients in GEx over-represented the working-age group, i.e. 65% were between 18 and 65 years old. Stage IV disease was frequently recorded at diagnosis (59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS). All-cause mortality rate was 38.8 (HIRD+CCQP) and 27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of NSCLC as a use-case demonstrated that GEx is a valuable data ecosystem with a generalizable working-age patient population and comprehensive data to facilitate timely real-world evidence generation in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate capabilities of the Generating Evidence Excellence (GEx) research environment using Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) as a use-case.

Methods: Patients with incident NSCLC were identified in GEx from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2019. Two GEx data containers were used: (1) claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) linked to clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP); (2) claims data from the HIRD and a second large commercially insured claims dataset (CD2) linked to electronic medical records from IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patient demographics and all-cause mortality were contrasted with the American Community Survey and the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) public use database. Descriptive analyses were completed via SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12 and SEER*stat.

Results: The study sample comprised of 6,233 (HIRD+CCQP) and 1,176 (HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) patients with NSCLC. Both GEx data containers had similar patient demographics with a mean age 63 years and 71% White, while 70% of USCS patients were ≥65 years and 85% White. Most patients resided in the South/Midwest regions of the US (74% (HIRD+CCQP) and 86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patients in GEx over-represented the working-age group, i.e. 65% were between 18 and 65 years old. Stage IV disease was frequently recorded at diagnosis (59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS). All-cause mortality rate was 38.8 (HIRD+CCQP) and 27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) per 100 person-years.

Conclusions: The analysis of NSCLC as a use-case demonstrated that GEx is a valuable data ecosystem with a generalizable working-age patient population and comprehensive data to facilitate timely real-world evidence generation in oncology.

整合行政索赔和临床数据,推进肿瘤学真实世界的证据生成。
目的:本研究的目的是评估以非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)为例的生成卓越证据(GEx)研究环境的能力。方法:2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日在GEx中发现的非小细胞肺癌患者。使用了两个GEx数据容器:(1)来自医疗保健综合研究数据库(HIRD)的索赔与来自癌症护理质量计划(CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP)的临床数据相关联;(2)来自HIRD和第二个大型商业保险索赔数据集(CD2)的索赔数据,该数据集与来自intrinsq Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS)的电子医疗记录相关联。患者人口统计数据和全因死亡率与美国社区调查和美国癌症统计(USCS)公共使用数据库进行对比。描述性分析通过SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12和SEER*stat完成。结果:研究样本包括6233例(HIRD+CCQP)和1176例(HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) NSCLC患者。两个GEx数据容器具有相似的患者人口统计数据,平均年龄为63岁,71%为白人,而70%的USCS患者年龄≥65岁,85%为白人。大多数患者居住在美国南部/中西部地区(74% (HIRD+CCQP)和86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS)。GEx患者在工作年龄群体中占比过高,即65%的患者年龄在18至65岁之间。诊断时经常记录IV期疾病(59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS)。全因死亡率分别为38.8 (HIRD+CCQP)和27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) / 100人年。结论:对非小细胞肺癌的用例分析表明,GEx是一个有价值的数据生态系统,具有可推广的工作年龄患者群体和全面的数据,有助于及时生成肿瘤学中的真实证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信