A prospective feasibility study to differentiate sacral neuromodulation lead electrode configurations using motor and sensory thresholds and locations of sensation.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tianyu He, Christopher Hornung, Michael D Evans, Stephanie J Zoghbi, Leya A Chahine, Fatima A Nazar, Dwight E Nelson, Nissrine Nakib
{"title":"A prospective feasibility study to differentiate sacral neuromodulation lead electrode configurations using motor and sensory thresholds and locations of sensation.","authors":"Tianyu He, Christopher Hornung, Michael D Evans, Stephanie J Zoghbi, Leya A Chahine, Fatima A Nazar, Dwight E Nelson, Nissrine Nakib","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01724-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate positioning and programming of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) relies upon the use of several intraoperative and postoperative stimulation measurements. While the clinical utility of these acute measurements including pelvic floor motor thresholds (PFMT), toe/leg motor thresholds (TMT), and sensory thresholds (ST), are widely accepted, their usefulness in quantitative research remains unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to test these measurements and gauge their utility in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight participants received Axonics SNM, 6 Medtronic Interstim II, and 2 Medtronic Micro SNM. PFMT was measured after implantation. ST and the location of sensation (LOS) were measured immediately postoperatively (PO), at pre-release from the surgery center (PR), and during a follow-up clinic visit (FU). Thresholds were compared across contact and time using linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in PFMT were found across electrode configurations, with stimulation through proximal contacts exhibiting lower PFMT than distal configurations. ST displayed no significant differences across electrodes and showed minimal changes over time. LOS exhibited substantial variability across patients and periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that PFMT were able to differentiate differences across electrode configurations that may be useful for future quantitative research. The lack of differences in ST and LOS across electrode configurations was interesting given the focus on these measurements clinically. Future testing is to confirm these limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01724-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate positioning and programming of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) relies upon the use of several intraoperative and postoperative stimulation measurements. While the clinical utility of these acute measurements including pelvic floor motor thresholds (PFMT), toe/leg motor thresholds (TMT), and sensory thresholds (ST), are widely accepted, their usefulness in quantitative research remains unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to test these measurements and gauge their utility in future research.

Methods: Eight participants received Axonics SNM, 6 Medtronic Interstim II, and 2 Medtronic Micro SNM. PFMT was measured after implantation. ST and the location of sensation (LOS) were measured immediately postoperatively (PO), at pre-release from the surgery center (PR), and during a follow-up clinic visit (FU). Thresholds were compared across contact and time using linear mixed-effects models.

Results: Significant differences in PFMT were found across electrode configurations, with stimulation through proximal contacts exhibiting lower PFMT than distal configurations. ST displayed no significant differences across electrodes and showed minimal changes over time. LOS exhibited substantial variability across patients and periods.

Conclusions: Results suggest that PFMT were able to differentiate differences across electrode configurations that may be useful for future quantitative research. The lack of differences in ST and LOS across electrode configurations was interesting given the focus on these measurements clinically. Future testing is to confirm these limitations.

利用运动和感觉阈值和感觉位置来区分骶神经调节导联电极配置的前瞻性可行性研究。
背景:骶神经调节(SNM)的准确定位和规划依赖于术中和术后几种刺激测量的使用。虽然这些急性测量包括盆底运动阈值(PFMT)、脚趾/腿部运动阈值(TMT)和感觉阈值(ST)的临床应用被广泛接受,但它们在定量研究中的用途尚不清楚。这项前瞻性研究的目的是检验这些测量方法,并衡量它们在未来研究中的效用。方法:8例患者接受Axonics SNM治疗,6例美敦力Interstim II治疗,2例美敦力Micro SNM治疗。植入后测量PFMT。ST和感觉定位(LOS)分别在术后(PO)、手术中心释放前(PR)和随访期间(FU)进行测量。使用线性混合效应模型比较了接触和时间的阈值。结果:在不同的电极配置中发现PFMT的显著差异,通过近端接触的刺激显示出比远端配置更低的PFMT。ST在电极之间没有显着差异,随着时间的推移变化很小。LOS在不同患者和不同时期表现出很大的差异。结论:结果表明,PFMT能够区分不同电极配置的差异,这可能对未来的定量研究有用。考虑到临床对这些测量的关注,不同电极配置的ST和LOS缺乏差异是有趣的。未来的测试将证实这些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信