Results of the preclinical multicenter randomized controlled paclitaxel-induced neuropathy prevention replication study (PINPRICS).

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Wolfgang Boehmerle, Tim Hagenacker, Markus Leo, Linda-Isabell Schmitt, Helmar C Lehmann, Ines Klein, Regina Stegherr, Frank Konietschke, Matthias Endres, Petra Huehnchen
{"title":"Results of the preclinical multicenter randomized controlled paclitaxel-induced neuropathy prevention replication study (PINPRICS).","authors":"Wolfgang Boehmerle, Tim Hagenacker, Markus Leo, Linda-Isabell Schmitt, Helmar C Lehmann, Ines Klein, Regina Stegherr, Frank Konietschke, Matthias Endres, Petra Huehnchen","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07206-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent and serious side effect of many cytotoxic drugs, including paclitaxel. Despite the identification of treatment options in animal models, clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of CIPN have been negative. Major challenges for successful clinical translation of preclinical data include a lack of reproducibility and randomization, small sample sizes and insufficient statistical tests. We therefore conducted a confirmatory, preclinical multicenter randomized controlled replication trial to test the safety and efficacy of three drugs for preventing paclitaxel-induced polyneuropathy: (1) nilotinib, (2) lithium carbonate and (3) interleukin-6-neutralizing antibodies. We preregistered the data analysis plan as well as the two-step study protocol: the optimal doses of the three compounds were assessed first and then tested in a mouse breast cancer xenograft model to compare safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unfortunately, toxicity of intraperitoneally administered nilotinib in combination with paclitaxel was observed, and higher-than-expected tumor growth resulted in a lack of power when the trial was analyzed. Thus, although lithium carbonate and IL-6-neutralizing antibodies tended toward neuroprotection, the differences between these groups were not statistically significant. However, the PINPRICS study ultimately still provides important lessons with regard to the planning and conduction of multicenter preclinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07206-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent and serious side effect of many cytotoxic drugs, including paclitaxel. Despite the identification of treatment options in animal models, clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of CIPN have been negative. Major challenges for successful clinical translation of preclinical data include a lack of reproducibility and randomization, small sample sizes and insufficient statistical tests. We therefore conducted a confirmatory, preclinical multicenter randomized controlled replication trial to test the safety and efficacy of three drugs for preventing paclitaxel-induced polyneuropathy: (1) nilotinib, (2) lithium carbonate and (3) interleukin-6-neutralizing antibodies. We preregistered the data analysis plan as well as the two-step study protocol: the optimal doses of the three compounds were assessed first and then tested in a mouse breast cancer xenograft model to compare safety and efficacy.

Results: Unfortunately, toxicity of intraperitoneally administered nilotinib in combination with paclitaxel was observed, and higher-than-expected tumor growth resulted in a lack of power when the trial was analyzed. Thus, although lithium carbonate and IL-6-neutralizing antibodies tended toward neuroprotection, the differences between these groups were not statistically significant. However, the PINPRICS study ultimately still provides important lessons with regard to the planning and conduction of multicenter preclinical trials.

临床前多中心随机对照紫杉醇诱导的神经病变预防复制研究(PINPRICS)的结果。
目的:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是包括紫杉醇在内的许多细胞毒性药物的常见且严重的副作用。尽管在动物模型中确定了治疗方案,但治疗或预防CIPN的临床试验结果是负面的。临床前数据成功临床转化的主要挑战包括缺乏可重复性和随机化、样本量小和统计检验不足。因此,我们进行了一项验证性的临床前多中心随机对照复制试验,以测试三种药物预防紫杉醇诱导的多神经病变的安全性和有效性:(1)尼罗替尼,(2)碳酸锂和(3)白细胞介素-6中和抗体。我们预先注册了数据分析计划和两步研究方案:首先评估三种化合物的最佳剂量,然后在小鼠乳腺癌异种移植模型中进行测试,以比较安全性和有效性。结果:不幸的是,尼罗替尼与紫杉醇联合腹腔注射的毒性被观察到,并且在分析试验时,高于预期的肿瘤生长导致缺乏动力。因此,尽管碳酸锂和il -6中和抗体倾向于神经保护,但两组之间的差异没有统计学意义。然而,PINPRICS研究最终仍然为多中心临床前试验的规划和实施提供了重要的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信