{"title":"X-ray Prediction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Low Back Pain.","authors":"Robert J McCormick, Michael D Perloff","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging use in low back pain management can be associated with added costs and increased surgical interventions. Lumbar x-ray findings predicting magnetic resonance imaging results were assessed in patients with low back pain, excluding postsurgical, red flag, or spinal stenosis history. At an outpatient pain clinic, 100 patients were selected (sequentially) from 12/1/2021 to 3/15/2022 that had lumbar x-rays within 1 yr prior to lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging reports were analyzed by two readers. Forty-six patients had moderate facet hypertrophy on x-ray, 35 (76.1%) also had moderate facet hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's rank correlation Rs = 0.386, P < 0.0001). Thirty-eight patients had moderate multilevel degenerative changes on x-ray, 34 (89.5%) also had moderate disc bulge on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.360, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients who had moderate disc height loss on x-ray, 14 (77.8%) also had moderate disc desiccation, height loss, or space narrowing on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.554, P < 0.00000001). Forty-three patients had a listhesis on x-ray, and 20 (46.5%) also had a listhesis on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.458, P < 0.0001). Lumbar x-ray is a reasonable study in the setting of axial and subacute radicular low back pain, where red flags are absent, predicting moderate pathology on magnetic resonance imaging > 75% of the time, and being more sensitive for listhesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"671-674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging use in low back pain management can be associated with added costs and increased surgical interventions. Lumbar x-ray findings predicting magnetic resonance imaging results were assessed in patients with low back pain, excluding postsurgical, red flag, or spinal stenosis history. At an outpatient pain clinic, 100 patients were selected (sequentially) from 12/1/2021 to 3/15/2022 that had lumbar x-rays within 1 yr prior to lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging reports were analyzed by two readers. Forty-six patients had moderate facet hypertrophy on x-ray, 35 (76.1%) also had moderate facet hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's rank correlation Rs = 0.386, P < 0.0001). Thirty-eight patients had moderate multilevel degenerative changes on x-ray, 34 (89.5%) also had moderate disc bulge on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.360, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients who had moderate disc height loss on x-ray, 14 (77.8%) also had moderate disc desiccation, height loss, or space narrowing on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.554, P < 0.00000001). Forty-three patients had a listhesis on x-ray, and 20 (46.5%) also had a listhesis on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.458, P < 0.0001). Lumbar x-ray is a reasonable study in the setting of axial and subacute radicular low back pain, where red flags are absent, predicting moderate pathology on magnetic resonance imaging > 75% of the time, and being more sensitive for listhesis.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).