Impact of Anastomotic Leaks on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following McKeown Esophagectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Chufeng Zeng, Xu Zhang, Bei Jia, Yi Hu, Peng Lin, Jianhua Fu, Hao Long, Tiehua Rong, Xiaodong Su
{"title":"Impact of Anastomotic Leaks on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following McKeown Esophagectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Chufeng Zeng, Xu Zhang, Bei Jia, Yi Hu, Peng Lin, Jianhua Fu, Hao Long, Tiehua Rong, Xiaodong Su","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17206-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of anastomotic leak (AL) on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study investigated whether AL influences the long-term survival of patients with ESCC following McKeown esophagectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An original database was queried to identify patients with ESCC who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between 2012 and 2020 at a high-volume cancer center. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1614 patients were included, of whom 16.9% developed AL. In patients without neoadjuvant therapy, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 55.8% and 62.0%, and the 5-year DFS was 48.7% and 59.1%, respectively (OS: p = 0.37, DFS: p = 0.046). In the neoadjuvant cohort, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 57.9% and 63.2%, and the 5-year DFS was 55.4% and 58.8%, respectively (OS: p = 0.48, DFS: p = 0.78). Moreover, AL significantly increased the risk of distant recurrence in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that AL negatively influences DFS in patients without neoadjuvant therapy, but does not significantly affect long-term survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Intensive treatment and follow-up plan should be considered when patients without neoadjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17206-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The impact of anastomotic leak (AL) on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study investigated whether AL influences the long-term survival of patients with ESCC following McKeown esophagectomy.
Patients and methods: An original database was queried to identify patients with ESCC who underwent McKeown esophagectomy between 2012 and 2020 at a high-volume cancer center. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for the confounding factors.
Results: A total of 1614 patients were included, of whom 16.9% developed AL. In patients without neoadjuvant therapy, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 55.8% and 62.0%, and the 5-year DFS was 48.7% and 59.1%, respectively (OS: p = 0.37, DFS: p = 0.046). In the neoadjuvant cohort, for patients with and without AL, the 5-year OS was 57.9% and 63.2%, and the 5-year DFS was 55.4% and 58.8%, respectively (OS: p = 0.48, DFS: p = 0.78). Moreover, AL significantly increased the risk of distant recurrence in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.023).
Conclusions: These findings suggest that AL negatively influences DFS in patients without neoadjuvant therapy, but does not significantly affect long-term survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Intensive treatment and follow-up plan should be considered when patients without neoadjuvant therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.