Study protocol for a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial to evaluate implementation of a suicide risk identification model among behavioral health patients in three large health systems.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Scott P Stumbo, Stephanie A Hooker, Rebecca C Rossom, Kathleen Miley, Brian K Ahmedani, Elizabeth Lockhart, Hseuh-Han Yeh, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough
{"title":"Study protocol for a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial to evaluate implementation of a suicide risk identification model among behavioral health patients in three large health systems.","authors":"Scott P Stumbo, Stephanie A Hooker, Rebecca C Rossom, Kathleen Miley, Brian K Ahmedani, Elizabeth Lockhart, Hseuh-Han Yeh, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06760-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-adjusted suicide rates have increased in the U.S. over the past 25 years. Algorithm-based methods for identifying individuals at risk for suicide based on electronic health record and claims data have been validated but few studies have evaluated implementation or effects on population-level suicide attempt rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial will test a suicide risk identification model in behavioral health clinics at three large health systems. Local decision-makers will determine implementation specifics at each site. Clinics within each health system will be randomized to determine order of implementation. A stepped-wedge design using repeated measures pre/post-implementation maximizes statistical efficiency and power with fewer participants compared to a parallel design while allowing all clinics to participate. A pre-implementation period will serve as the baseline. The primary outcome will be the rate of suicide attempt per 1000 visits at 90- and 180-days following a behavioral health visit in which an individual was identified by the suicide risk model compared with the baseline period (no use of suicide risk model). Secondary outcomes include identification of suicide risk and recognition of individuals at risk for suicide (e.g., completed risk assessment), both compared to the baseline period. Generalized linear mixed models will be used to account for clustering within clinics and repeated measures over time, adjusting for relevant covariates to estimate the effect of the suicide risk model on outcomes. Implementation outcomes, including system-level determinants and clinician acceptance and use of the suicide risk model, will also be measured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few suicide risk models derived from administrative and clinical data have been tested in real world care settings. This trial will determine whether the use of such a risk model reduces suicide attempts compared to usual care. By describing important implementation factors, use of such risk models, if effective, may be accelerated for other health care systems.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06060535.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06760-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Age-adjusted suicide rates have increased in the U.S. over the past 25 years. Algorithm-based methods for identifying individuals at risk for suicide based on electronic health record and claims data have been validated but few studies have evaluated implementation or effects on population-level suicide attempt rates.

Methods: This hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation pragmatic clinical trial will test a suicide risk identification model in behavioral health clinics at three large health systems. Local decision-makers will determine implementation specifics at each site. Clinics within each health system will be randomized to determine order of implementation. A stepped-wedge design using repeated measures pre/post-implementation maximizes statistical efficiency and power with fewer participants compared to a parallel design while allowing all clinics to participate. A pre-implementation period will serve as the baseline. The primary outcome will be the rate of suicide attempt per 1000 visits at 90- and 180-days following a behavioral health visit in which an individual was identified by the suicide risk model compared with the baseline period (no use of suicide risk model). Secondary outcomes include identification of suicide risk and recognition of individuals at risk for suicide (e.g., completed risk assessment), both compared to the baseline period. Generalized linear mixed models will be used to account for clustering within clinics and repeated measures over time, adjusting for relevant covariates to estimate the effect of the suicide risk model on outcomes. Implementation outcomes, including system-level determinants and clinician acceptance and use of the suicide risk model, will also be measured.

Conclusions: Few suicide risk models derived from administrative and clinical data have been tested in real world care settings. This trial will determine whether the use of such a risk model reduces suicide attempts compared to usual care. By describing important implementation factors, use of such risk models, if effective, may be accelerated for other health care systems.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06060535.

在三个大型卫生系统中评估自杀风险识别模型在行为健康患者中的实施的阶梯式随机对照试验研究方案。
背景:在过去的25年里,美国年龄调整后的自杀率有所上升。基于算法的基于电子健康记录和索赔数据识别自杀风险个体的方法已得到验证,但很少有研究评估实施情况或对人口水平自杀企图率的影响。方法:这个混合型I型有效性实施实用临床试验将在三个大型卫生系统的行为健康诊所中测试自杀风险识别模型。当地决策者将决定每个站点的实施细节。每个卫生系统内的诊所将被随机分配,以确定实施顺序。与平行设计相比,楔形设计在允许所有诊所参与的同时,在实施前/实施后使用重复测量,使统计效率和统计能力最大化。执行前的一段时间将作为基准。主要结果将是在行为健康访问后的90天和180天内,每1000次访问的自杀未遂率,其中通过自杀风险模型与基线期(不使用自杀风险模型)进行比较。次要结果包括自杀风险的识别和自杀风险个体的识别(例如,完成的风险评估),两者都与基线期相比。广义线性混合模型将用于解释诊所内的聚类和随时间重复测量,调整相关协变量以估计自杀风险模型对结果的影响。实施结果,包括系统层面的决定因素和临床医生接受和使用自杀风险模型,也将被衡量。结论:很少有来自行政和临床数据的自杀风险模型已经在现实世界的护理环境中进行了测试。这项试验将确定与常规护理相比,使用这种风险模型是否能减少自杀企图。通过描述重要的实施因素,这种风险模型的使用如果有效,可能会加速其他卫生保健系统的使用。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06060535。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信