The association of motivational factors with weight loss and treatment time in a publicly funded weight management clinic.

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1111/cob.70014
Amir Yazdanparast, Sean Wharton, Hala Tamim, Alison K Macpherson, Jennifer L Kuk
{"title":"The association of motivational factors with weight loss and treatment time in a publicly funded weight management clinic.","authors":"Amir Yazdanparast, Sean Wharton, Hala Tamim, Alison K Macpherson, Jennifer L Kuk","doi":"10.1111/cob.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the study is to explore differences in weight loss (WL) and treatment time with having health, mobility, and/or aesthetics motivations for attempting WL. Data from 7540 adults with overweight or obesity who participated in a publicly funded weight management programme at the Wharton Medical Clinic were analysed. Patients' WL motivations were categorised into six groups: Health only; Health and Aesthetics; Health and Mobility; Health, Mobility and Aesthetics; No Health; and None. Women with Health, Mobility and Aesthetics or No Health motivations had marginally higher WL goals compared to other groups, with no differences in men. Men with Health and Aesthetics or Health and Mobility motivations showed marginally higher 6-month attendance rates. Men who discontinued after one visit were 40% less likely to have a Health and Aesthetics motivation as opposed to Health only, compared to those who continued. No differences were observed in WL between motivation groups in either sex. No correlation was found between WL goals and WL attained. Only weak correlations between treatment time and WL were observed across most motivation groups. Despite small differences in treatment time and WL goals, motivations for attempting WL were not significantly associated with differences in the WL achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e70014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study is to explore differences in weight loss (WL) and treatment time with having health, mobility, and/or aesthetics motivations for attempting WL. Data from 7540 adults with overweight or obesity who participated in a publicly funded weight management programme at the Wharton Medical Clinic were analysed. Patients' WL motivations were categorised into six groups: Health only; Health and Aesthetics; Health and Mobility; Health, Mobility and Aesthetics; No Health; and None. Women with Health, Mobility and Aesthetics or No Health motivations had marginally higher WL goals compared to other groups, with no differences in men. Men with Health and Aesthetics or Health and Mobility motivations showed marginally higher 6-month attendance rates. Men who discontinued after one visit were 40% less likely to have a Health and Aesthetics motivation as opposed to Health only, compared to those who continued. No differences were observed in WL between motivation groups in either sex. No correlation was found between WL goals and WL attained. Only weak correlations between treatment time and WL were observed across most motivation groups. Despite small differences in treatment time and WL goals, motivations for attempting WL were not significantly associated with differences in the WL achieved.

动机因素与减肥和治疗时间在公共资助的体重管理诊所的关系。
本研究的目的是探讨减肥(WL)和治疗时间的差异与健康,流动性和/或美学动机的尝试WL。研究人员分析了7540名超重或肥胖的成年人的数据,他们参加了沃顿医学诊所的一个公共资助的体重管理项目。患者的WL动机分为六组:只为健康;健康与美学;保健和流动;健康、流动性和美学;没有健康;和没有。与其他群体相比,健康、行动、美学或无健康动机的女性的目标略高,而男性之间没有差异。以“健康与美学”或“健康与运动”为动机的男性6个月的出勤率略高。与那些继续治疗的男性相比,在一次治疗后停止治疗的男性有健康和美学动机的可能性要低40%。不同性别动机组间的WL均无差异。WL目标与达到的WL没有相关性。在大多数动机组中,治疗时间和WL之间仅存在弱相关性。尽管在治疗时间和WL目标上存在微小差异,但尝试WL的动机与WL实现的差异并没有显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信