Dual biological treatments in immune-mediated disorders: a single center experience.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Oded Shamriz, Elchanan Parnasa, Limor Rubin, Aviv Talmon, Yaarit Ribak, Isaam Hindi, Hagit Peleg, Ronit Confino-Cohen, Yuval Tal
{"title":"Dual biological treatments in immune-mediated disorders: a single center experience.","authors":"Oded Shamriz, Elchanan Parnasa, Limor Rubin, Aviv Talmon, Yaarit Ribak, Isaam Hindi, Hagit Peleg, Ronit Confino-Cohen, Yuval Tal","doi":"10.1186/s12865-025-00705-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians may encounter situations where they need to co-administer omalizumab with non-IgE-targeting monoclonal antibodies. In this study, we share our experience with these dual biologic treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy using omalizumab and non-IgE-targeting monoclonal antibodies at a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adults treated with a dual biological therapy regimen consisting of omalizumab and another biologic between 2020 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review identified nine patients (age range: 51-75 years, 7 women and 2 men) who were treated with omalizumab for high Th2 disorders, including chronic spontaneous urticaria (n = 7) and asthma (n = 2). Seven patients received a second biologic for co-existing non-Th2 disorders, while two received an additional biologic to better control their Th2-mediated disorders. The patients were treated with the following biologics: anti-IL-5 agents (mepolizumab [n = 1] and benralizumab [n = 1]), the IL-4/13 inhibitor dupilumab (n = 1), the anti-IL-17 biologic secukinumab (n = 1), the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra (n = 1), the anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide agent fremanezumab (n = 1), and anti-TNF-α agents (etanercept [n = 1], golimumab [n = 1], and adalimumab [n = 1]). Dual biotherapy was administered for 3-34 months with observed clinical improvement. No adverse events or infections were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual biological treatment with omalizumab and another biologic appears to be safe, with no need to discontinue non-IgE-targeting agents during omalizumab therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9040,"journal":{"name":"BMC Immunology","volume":"26 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-025-00705-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians may encounter situations where they need to co-administer omalizumab with non-IgE-targeting monoclonal antibodies. In this study, we share our experience with these dual biologic treatments.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy using omalizumab and non-IgE-targeting monoclonal antibodies at a single center.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adults treated with a dual biological therapy regimen consisting of omalizumab and another biologic between 2020 and 2022.

Results: Our review identified nine patients (age range: 51-75 years, 7 women and 2 men) who were treated with omalizumab for high Th2 disorders, including chronic spontaneous urticaria (n = 7) and asthma (n = 2). Seven patients received a second biologic for co-existing non-Th2 disorders, while two received an additional biologic to better control their Th2-mediated disorders. The patients were treated with the following biologics: anti-IL-5 agents (mepolizumab [n = 1] and benralizumab [n = 1]), the IL-4/13 inhibitor dupilumab (n = 1), the anti-IL-17 biologic secukinumab (n = 1), the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra (n = 1), the anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide agent fremanezumab (n = 1), and anti-TNF-α agents (etanercept [n = 1], golimumab [n = 1], and adalimumab [n = 1]). Dual biotherapy was administered for 3-34 months with observed clinical improvement. No adverse events or infections were reported.

Conclusions: Dual biological treatment with omalizumab and another biologic appears to be safe, with no need to discontinue non-IgE-targeting agents during omalizumab therapy.

免疫介导疾病的双重生物治疗:单一中心经验。
背景:医生可能会遇到需要与非ige靶向单克隆抗体联合使用omalizumab的情况。在这项研究中,我们分享了我们在这些双重生物治疗方面的经验。目的:评价奥玛珠单抗与非ige靶向单克隆抗体单中心双重生物治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2020年至2022年期间接受由奥玛单抗和另一种生物制剂组成的双重生物治疗方案的成人医疗记录。结果:我们的回顾确定了9例患者(年龄范围:51-75岁,7名女性和2名男性),他们接受了omalizumab治疗高Th2疾病,包括慢性自发性荨麻疹(n = 7)和哮喘(n = 2)。7名患者接受第二种生物制剂治疗共存的非th2疾病,而2名患者接受额外的生物制剂以更好地控制其th2介导的疾病。患者接受以下生物制剂治疗:抗il -5药物(mepolizumab [n = 1]和benralizumab [n = 1]), IL-4/13抑制剂dupilumab (n = 1),抗il -17生物制剂secukinumab (n = 1), IL-1抑制剂anakinra (n = 1),抗降钙素基因相关肽药物fremanezumab (n = 1),抗tnf -α药物(依那西普[n = 1], golimumab [n = 1],阿达木单抗[n = 1])。双生物治疗3-34个月,观察到临床改善。无不良事件或感染报告。结论:奥玛珠单抗和另一种生物制剂的双重生物治疗似乎是安全的,在奥玛珠单抗治疗期间不需要停止使用非ige靶向药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Immunology
BMC Immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Immunology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in molecular, cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of the immune system as well as clinical studies and animal models of human diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信