{"title":"Effectiveness of Suicide Prevention Programmes Among Adolescents and Sociocultural Adaptation of Programmes: A Systematic Review","authors":"Rita Pokharel Poudel, Sheeja Perumbil Pathrose, Diana Jefferies, Lucie M. Ramjan","doi":"10.1111/inm.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Suicide is a leading cause of adolescent death and is preventable through school-based programs. This review aimed to identify available suicide prevention programmes for adolescents, their contextualisation, and effects on suicidal behaviours, help-seeking, knowledge, attitude and coping. This review was conducted by searching four databases following PRISMA guidelines. Articles published till September 2023 were searched, and the search was re-run in June 2024. All types of studies conducted among adolescents, outside healthcare facilities and published in English were included. Studies that included adolescents with pre-existing mental health conditions, gender and sexual minority groups were excluded. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469637). A total of 53 of 3663 identified articles were included. There were 41 different suicide prevention programmes used across the 53 studies. Data extraction focused on author, published year, country, study aims, population, interventions, comparison groups, contextualisation and the outcomes of interventions. Most of the studies (64.2%) were conducted in the United States of America. Three studies mentioned the contextualisation of the programme without details. Of the studies measuring suicidal behaviours (82.1%), help-seeking (66.7%), knowledge (93.8%), attitude (81.8%) and coping (50%), all reported on the effectiveness of programmes. Studies from low- and middle-income countries could not be identified, and very few studies mentioned the contextualisation of programmes. The heterogeneity of the studies and diversity of the programmes, tools, standards of delivery and follow-up times across the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions about the overall effectiveness of programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of adolescent death and is preventable through school-based programs. This review aimed to identify available suicide prevention programmes for adolescents, their contextualisation, and effects on suicidal behaviours, help-seeking, knowledge, attitude and coping. This review was conducted by searching four databases following PRISMA guidelines. Articles published till September 2023 were searched, and the search was re-run in June 2024. All types of studies conducted among adolescents, outside healthcare facilities and published in English were included. Studies that included adolescents with pre-existing mental health conditions, gender and sexual minority groups were excluded. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469637). A total of 53 of 3663 identified articles were included. There were 41 different suicide prevention programmes used across the 53 studies. Data extraction focused on author, published year, country, study aims, population, interventions, comparison groups, contextualisation and the outcomes of interventions. Most of the studies (64.2%) were conducted in the United States of America. Three studies mentioned the contextualisation of the programme without details. Of the studies measuring suicidal behaviours (82.1%), help-seeking (66.7%), knowledge (93.8%), attitude (81.8%) and coping (50%), all reported on the effectiveness of programmes. Studies from low- and middle-income countries could not be identified, and very few studies mentioned the contextualisation of programmes. The heterogeneity of the studies and diversity of the programmes, tools, standards of delivery and follow-up times across the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions about the overall effectiveness of programmes.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research.
The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues.
The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed.
Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.