Competitive ability underpins the effect of spatial aggregation on plant performance

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70075
Naoto Shinohara, Haruna Ohsaki
{"title":"Competitive ability underpins the effect of spatial aggregation on plant performance","authors":"Naoto Shinohara,&nbsp;Haruna Ohsaki","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most plant species exhibit spatially clustered distributions. Theory suggests such conspecific aggregation can delay competitive exclusion by sparing weak competitors. However, the extent to which spatial aggregation increases species performance and which species are likely to benefit from it remain largely unknown. In this study, we asked (1) whether spatial aggregation enhances plant performance and (2) whether the effects are biologically predictable. For the second question, we focused on “the competition-relatedness hypothesis” and the “competitive asymmetry hypothesis,” which relate the effect of spatial arrangement to niche and competitive ability differences between species, respectively. We performed phylogenetic meta-analyses to investigate whether phylogenetic and ecological differences among competitors explain the effect of spatial arrangement. We found idiosyncratic responses of plant species to spatial aggregation. While some species performed better when conspecific individuals were aggregated, others did so when conspecifics and heterospecifics were randomly distributed. The non-negligible number of species benefiting more from intraspecific aggregation indicates that intraspecific competition is sometimes weaker than interspecific competition. Further, the result contrasts with the assumption of the competition-relatedness hypothesis, which postulates the strongest competition among conspecifics, suggesting that this hypothesis does not hold for at least these species. Although phylogeny did not predict the effect of spatial arrangement, interspecific plant height differences did: Species performed better in an aggregation treatment when they were smaller than competitors. Collectively, our results lend more support for the competitive asymmetry hypothesis that interspecific differences in competitive ability underpin the effect of spatial arrangement on plant performance. Moreover, they suggest that spatial processes, such as dispersal limitation, may play an important role in plant coexistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most plant species exhibit spatially clustered distributions. Theory suggests such conspecific aggregation can delay competitive exclusion by sparing weak competitors. However, the extent to which spatial aggregation increases species performance and which species are likely to benefit from it remain largely unknown. In this study, we asked (1) whether spatial aggregation enhances plant performance and (2) whether the effects are biologically predictable. For the second question, we focused on “the competition-relatedness hypothesis” and the “competitive asymmetry hypothesis,” which relate the effect of spatial arrangement to niche and competitive ability differences between species, respectively. We performed phylogenetic meta-analyses to investigate whether phylogenetic and ecological differences among competitors explain the effect of spatial arrangement. We found idiosyncratic responses of plant species to spatial aggregation. While some species performed better when conspecific individuals were aggregated, others did so when conspecifics and heterospecifics were randomly distributed. The non-negligible number of species benefiting more from intraspecific aggregation indicates that intraspecific competition is sometimes weaker than interspecific competition. Further, the result contrasts with the assumption of the competition-relatedness hypothesis, which postulates the strongest competition among conspecifics, suggesting that this hypothesis does not hold for at least these species. Although phylogeny did not predict the effect of spatial arrangement, interspecific plant height differences did: Species performed better in an aggregation treatment when they were smaller than competitors. Collectively, our results lend more support for the competitive asymmetry hypothesis that interspecific differences in competitive ability underpin the effect of spatial arrangement on plant performance. Moreover, they suggest that spatial processes, such as dispersal limitation, may play an important role in plant coexistence.

Abstract Image

竞争能力是植物空间聚集效应的基础
大多数植物物种呈现空间聚集性分布。理论表明,这种同质聚集可以通过保留弱竞争者来延缓竞争排斥。然而,空间聚集在多大程度上提高了物种的表现,哪些物种可能从中受益,这在很大程度上仍然是未知的。在这项研究中,我们提出了以下问题:(1)空间聚集是否能提高植物的生长性能;(2)这种效应在生物学上是否可预测。对于第二个问题,我们重点研究了“竞争相关性假说”和“竞争不对称性假说”,分别将空间布局对物种间生态位和竞争能力差异的影响联系起来。我们进行了系统发育荟萃分析,以探讨竞争对手之间的系统发育和生态差异是否解释了空间布局的影响。我们发现了植物物种对空间聚集的特殊响应。当同种个体聚集在一起时,一些物种表现得更好,而当同种和异种个体随机分布时,其他物种表现得更好。从种内聚集中获益更多的物种数量不可忽略,这表明种内竞争有时比种间竞争弱。此外,该结果与竞争相关假说的假设形成对比,该假说假设同种物种之间的竞争最激烈,这表明该假说至少不适用于这些物种。虽然系统发育不能预测空间排列的影响,但种间植物高度差异可以预测:当物种比竞争对手小时,它们在聚集处理中表现更好。总的来说,我们的研究结果为竞争不对称假说提供了更多的支持,即竞争能力的种间差异支撑了空间安排对植物性能的影响。此外,他们认为空间过程,如扩散限制,可能在植物共存中起重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信