Scaffolding middle school mathematics curricula with large language models

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rizwaan Malik, Dorna Abdi, Rose Wang, Dorottya Demszky
{"title":"Scaffolding middle school mathematics curricula with large language models","authors":"Rizwaan Malik,&nbsp;Dorna Abdi,&nbsp;Rose Wang,&nbsp;Dorottya Demszky","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>Despite well-designed curriculum materials, teachers often face challenges implementing them due to diverse classroom needs. This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can support middle school math teachers by helping create high-quality curriculum scaffolds, which we define as the adaptations and supplements teachers employ to ensure all students can access and engage with the curriculum. Through cognitive task analysis with expert teachers, we identify a three-stage process for curriculum scaffolding: observation, strategy formulation and implementation. We incorporate these insights into three LLM approaches to create warmup tasks that activate students' background knowledge. The best-performing approach provides the model with the original curriculum materials and an expert-informed prompt; this approach generates warmups that are rated significantly higher than those created by expert teachers in terms of alignment to learning objectives, accessibility to students working below grade level and teacher preference. This research demonstrates the potential of LLMs to support teachers in creating effective scaffolds and provides a methodology for developing artificial intelligence-driven educational tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Scaffolding is essential for enabling students to access and engage with curriculum materials.</li>\n \n <li>Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating educational content and supporting teachers.</li>\n \n <li>Teachers frequently need to adapt and supplement standardized curricula to meet the diverse needs of their students.</li>\n </ul>\n \n <p>What this paper adds\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Identifies a three-stage curriculum scaffolding process (observation, strategy formulation, implementation) used by expert teachers.</li>\n \n <li>Demonstrates that providing LLMs with additional context from the curriculum, such as the original warmup task, helps to ground the model and improve the quality of the generated warmup tasks.</li>\n \n <li>Demonstrates that, when prompted well, LLMs can generate warmup tasks that are of similar or better quality compared to those created by expert teachers in terms of alignment to learning objectives, accessibility and teacher preference.</li>\n </ul>\n \n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Provides practical suggestions for prompting LLMs to generate high-quality warmup tasks for middle school math teachers, such as incorporating additional curriculum context and expert-informed prompts.</li>\n \n <li>Demonstrates how cognitive task analysis with expert teachers can be used to develop LLM-based tools for educators that align with their practices and preferences.</li>\n \n <li>Indicates that additional research is needed to explore the potential for LLMs to support other types of curriculum adaptations, evaluate their effectiveness in classroom settings and investigate how they can be effectively tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of individual students.</li>\n </ul>\n \n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 3","pages":"999-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite well-designed curriculum materials, teachers often face challenges implementing them due to diverse classroom needs. This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can support middle school math teachers by helping create high-quality curriculum scaffolds, which we define as the adaptations and supplements teachers employ to ensure all students can access and engage with the curriculum. Through cognitive task analysis with expert teachers, we identify a three-stage process for curriculum scaffolding: observation, strategy formulation and implementation. We incorporate these insights into three LLM approaches to create warmup tasks that activate students' background knowledge. The best-performing approach provides the model with the original curriculum materials and an expert-informed prompt; this approach generates warmups that are rated significantly higher than those created by expert teachers in terms of alignment to learning objectives, accessibility to students working below grade level and teacher preference. This research demonstrates the potential of LLMs to support teachers in creating effective scaffolds and provides a methodology for developing artificial intelligence-driven educational tools.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Scaffolding is essential for enabling students to access and engage with curriculum materials.
  • Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating educational content and supporting teachers.
  • Teachers frequently need to adapt and supplement standardized curricula to meet the diverse needs of their students.

What this paper adds

  • Identifies a three-stage curriculum scaffolding process (observation, strategy formulation, implementation) used by expert teachers.
  • Demonstrates that providing LLMs with additional context from the curriculum, such as the original warmup task, helps to ground the model and improve the quality of the generated warmup tasks.
  • Demonstrates that, when prompted well, LLMs can generate warmup tasks that are of similar or better quality compared to those created by expert teachers in terms of alignment to learning objectives, accessibility and teacher preference.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Provides practical suggestions for prompting LLMs to generate high-quality warmup tasks for middle school math teachers, such as incorporating additional curriculum context and expert-informed prompts.
  • Demonstrates how cognitive task analysis with expert teachers can be used to develop LLM-based tools for educators that align with their practices and preferences.
  • Indicates that additional research is needed to explore the potential for LLMs to support other types of curriculum adaptations, evaluate their effectiveness in classroom settings and investigate how they can be effectively tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of individual students.
基于大语言模型的脚手架中学数学课程
尽管课程材料设计良好,但由于课堂需求的多样化,教师在实施时往往面临挑战。本文调查了大型语言模型(llm)是否可以通过帮助创建高质量的课程框架来支持中学数学教师,我们将其定义为教师采用的适应和补充,以确保所有学生都能访问和参与课程。通过与专家教师的认知任务分析,我们确定了课程脚手架的三个阶段过程:观察、策略制定和实施。我们将这些见解纳入三种LLM方法中,以创建激活学生背景知识的热身任务。表现最好的方法为模型提供原始课程材料和专家信息提示;这种方法产生的热身活动在与学习目标的一致性、低于年级水平的学生的可及性和教师偏好方面的评分明显高于专家教师所创造的热身活动。这项研究证明了法学硕士在支持教师创建有效支架方面的潜力,并为开发人工智能驱动的教育工具提供了一种方法。从业人员注意到关于这个主题已经知道的脚手架对于使学生能够访问和参与课程材料是必不可少的。大型语言模型(llm)在生成教育内容和支持教师方面显示出了希望。教师经常需要调整和补充标准化课程,以满足学生的不同需求。确定了专家教师使用的三阶段课程脚手架过程(观察,策略制定,实施)。演示了为法学硕士提供额外的课程背景,例如原始的热身任务,有助于建立模型并提高生成的热身任务的质量。证明,当提示良好时,法学硕士可以生成与专家教师创建的热身任务在学习目标的一致性,可访问性和教师偏好方面相似或更好的质量。对实践和/或政策的启示为促使法学硕士为中学数学教师生成高质量的热身任务提供实用建议,例如纳入额外的课程背景和专家通知提示。演示如何使用专家教师的认知任务分析来为教育工作者开发基于法学硕士的工具,使其与他们的实践和偏好保持一致。表明需要进一步的研究来探索法学硕士支持其他类型课程适应的潜力,评估其在课堂环境中的有效性,并调查如何有效地针对个别学生的特定需求和特征进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信