Efficacy and Safety of Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption System at Different Therapeutic Doses During Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Pilot Study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Xiankun Sun, Yuan Zhao, Mingjin Dai, Fang Wang, Xinyu Chen, Zhongwei Zhang, Yuanji Ma, Ling Zhang, Yingying Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Double Plasma Molecular Adsorption System at Different Therapeutic Doses During Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Pilot Study","authors":"Xiankun Sun,&nbsp;Yuan Zhao,&nbsp;Mingjin Dai,&nbsp;Fang Wang,&nbsp;Xinyu Chen,&nbsp;Zhongwei Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanji Ma,&nbsp;Ling Zhang,&nbsp;Yingying Yang","doi":"10.1002/jca.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of increasing the dosage of the double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) in patients with liver failure during regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). A prospective nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted. Three groups (3 L group, 4.5 L group, and 6 L group) of patients with liver failure receiving DPMAS treatment were created on the basis of various therapeutic plasma volumes. A total of 303 patients were included, with 110 in the 3 L group, 121 in the 4.5 L group, and 72 in the 6 L group. At the end of treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in the bilirubin clearance rate among the groups (<i>H</i> = 15.239, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed that only the difference in the bilirubin clearance rates between the 6 L group and the 3 L group was statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). With the exception of base excess, no statistically significant differences were found between these three groups for any of the relevant laboratory indicators (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The incidence of hypotension, hypocalcemia, acidosis, alkalosis, hypernatremia, hyperlactatemia, and allergic reactions did not differ significantly among these three groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was found in clotting events among these three groups (<i>p</i> = 0.027), with a higher incidence observed in the 6 L group than in the 3 L group (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Increasing the therapeutic dose of RCA-DPMAS further removed bilirubin and did not increase the complications associated with citrate anticoagulation, but the coagulation risk is a concern.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of increasing the dosage of the double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) in patients with liver failure during regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). A prospective nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted. Three groups (3 L group, 4.5 L group, and 6 L group) of patients with liver failure receiving DPMAS treatment were created on the basis of various therapeutic plasma volumes. A total of 303 patients were included, with 110 in the 3 L group, 121 in the 4.5 L group, and 72 in the 6 L group. At the end of treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in the bilirubin clearance rate among the groups (H = 15.239, p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed that only the difference in the bilirubin clearance rates between the 6 L group and the 3 L group was statistically significant (p < 0.001). With the exception of base excess, no statistically significant differences were found between these three groups for any of the relevant laboratory indicators (p > 0.05). The incidence of hypotension, hypocalcemia, acidosis, alkalosis, hypernatremia, hyperlactatemia, and allergic reactions did not differ significantly among these three groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was found in clotting events among these three groups (p = 0.027), with a higher incidence observed in the 6 L group than in the 3 L group (p = 0.011). Increasing the therapeutic dose of RCA-DPMAS further removed bilirubin and did not increase the complications associated with citrate anticoagulation, but the coagulation risk is a concern.

不同剂量双等离子体分子吸附系统在局部柠檬酸盐抗凝中的疗效和安全性:一项初步研究
本研究旨在评估在局部柠檬酸抗凝(RCA)期间增加双血浆分子吸附系统(DPMAS)剂量对肝功能衰竭患者的安全性和治疗效果。进行了一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。根据不同的治疗血浆量将肝衰竭患者分为3组(3l组、4.5 L组和6l组)。共纳入303例患者,其中3l组110例,4.5 L组121例,6l组72例。治疗结束时,两组患者胆红素清除率比较,差异有统计学意义(H = 15.239, p < 0.001)。两两比较显示,只有6 L组与3 L组胆红素清除率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。除碱基过量外,三组间相关实验室指标均无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。低血压、低钙血症、酸中毒、碱中毒、高钠血症、高乳酸血症和过敏反应的发生率在三组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。此外,三组之间的凝血事件差异有统计学意义(p = 0.027), 6 L组的凝血事件发生率高于3 L组(p = 0.011)。增加RCA-DPMAS治疗剂量进一步去除胆红素,并没有增加与柠檬酸抗凝相关的并发症,但凝血风险值得关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信