Process Debt: Definition, Risks, and Management

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Antonio Martini, Viktoria Stray, Terese Besker, Nils Brede Moe, Jan Bosch
{"title":"Process Debt: Definition, Risks, and Management","authors":"Antonio Martini,&nbsp;Viktoria Stray,&nbsp;Terese Besker,&nbsp;Nils Brede Moe,&nbsp;Jan Bosch","doi":"10.1002/smr.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Process debt, like technical debt, can be a source of short-term benefits but often leads to harmful consequences in the long term for a software organization. Despite its impact, the phenomenon of process debt has not been thoroughly explored in current literature, leaving a gap in understanding how it affects and is managed within organizations. This paper addresses this gap by defining process debt, describing its occurrence, the risks of its mismanagement, and showing examples of mitigation strategies. Our study began with an exploratory phase involving semi-structured interviews with sixteen practitioners across four international organizations, allowing us to gather diverse insights into the occurrence and management of process debt. Then, to deepen our understanding and validate our findings, we conducted a cross-company focus group with ten additional practitioners and analyzed fifty-eight observations and thirty-five interviews from a longitudinal case study. The analysis of the research findings led to a definition of process debt and a novel framework. We also report on the causes, consequences, and occurrence patterns of process debt over time. We present mitigation strategies and discuss which ones need further attention for future research. Our results suggest that the debt metaphor may help companies understand how to manage and improve their processes and make process-related decisions that are beneficial both in the short and long term.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Process debt, like technical debt, can be a source of short-term benefits but often leads to harmful consequences in the long term for a software organization. Despite its impact, the phenomenon of process debt has not been thoroughly explored in current literature, leaving a gap in understanding how it affects and is managed within organizations. This paper addresses this gap by defining process debt, describing its occurrence, the risks of its mismanagement, and showing examples of mitigation strategies. Our study began with an exploratory phase involving semi-structured interviews with sixteen practitioners across four international organizations, allowing us to gather diverse insights into the occurrence and management of process debt. Then, to deepen our understanding and validate our findings, we conducted a cross-company focus group with ten additional practitioners and analyzed fifty-eight observations and thirty-five interviews from a longitudinal case study. The analysis of the research findings led to a definition of process debt and a novel framework. We also report on the causes, consequences, and occurrence patterns of process debt over time. We present mitigation strategies and discuss which ones need further attention for future research. Our results suggest that the debt metaphor may help companies understand how to manage and improve their processes and make process-related decisions that are beneficial both in the short and long term.

过程债务:定义、风险和管理
过程债,就像技术债一样,可以是短期利益的来源,但是对于软件组织来说,从长期来看往往会导致有害的后果。尽管它的影响,过程债的现象在当前的文献中还没有被彻底地探讨,在理解它是如何影响和在组织中被管理方面留下了一个空白。本文通过定义过程债务,描述其发生,管理不当的风险,并展示缓解策略的例子来解决这个差距。我们的研究开始于一个探索性的阶段,包括与四个国际组织的16个实践者进行半结构化的访谈,允许我们收集对过程债务的发生和管理的不同见解。然后,为了加深我们的理解和验证我们的发现,我们进行了一个跨公司的焦点小组,其中有10个额外的从业者,并分析了58个观察结果和35个纵向案例研究的访谈。对研究结果的分析导致了过程债的定义和一个新的框架。我们还报告了随着时间的推移过程债务的原因、后果和发生模式。我们提出了缓解策略,并讨论了哪些需要进一步关注未来的研究。我们的研究结果表明,债务隐喻可以帮助公司理解如何管理和改进他们的流程,并做出与流程相关的决策,这些决策在短期和长期都是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信