Adalimumab combination with corticosteroid therapy for Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Jia Liu, Mengyun Zhou, Taoye Li, Tianhong Xu
{"title":"Adalimumab combination with corticosteroid therapy for Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis","authors":"Jia Liu,&nbsp;Mengyun Zhou,&nbsp;Taoye Li,&nbsp;Tianhong Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04214-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a severe acute mucocutaneous reactions associated with considerable mortality and poor prognosis. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), as a traditional remedy, have been widely used in the treatment of SJS/TEN. Recent studies have reported the potential therapeutic benefits of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists on the disease. However, the optimal treatment remains unknown. This study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TNF-α antagonist adalimumab conjunction with corticosteroid to traditional remedy on SJS/TEN. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we enrolled 53 SJS/TEN patients received either traditional remedy (Corticosteroids and IVIG) or a combination therapy (TNF-α antagonist conjunction with corticosteroid). The primary endpoint was duration of hospitalization and re-epithelization time, and the secondary endpoints including exposure time to high-dose steroids, and major adverse event incidence. 26 patients received traditional remedy and 27 patients received combination remedy. In comparison to traditional remedy, the combination remedy reduced the hospitalization duration (25 ± 4.7 vs. 22 ± 5.2 days; <i>P</i> = 0.032), re-epithelization time (19 ± 2.5 vs.17 ± 3.4 days; <i>P</i> = 0.019), and exposure time to high-dose steroids (18 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 2 days; <i>P</i> = 0.025). Obviously, TNF-α levels in the combination group showed a significant decreased on the discharge day comparing to the traditional group (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 5.8 ± 2.2, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The major adverse event incidences were no significant statistically difference (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) within 6 months of follow-up after hospital discharge, and no death happened between two groups. The combination remedy (adalimumab conjunction with corticosteroid) could be an optimal treatment to promote disease recovery without increasing adverse events and morality in SJS/TEN patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-025-04214-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04214-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a severe acute mucocutaneous reactions associated with considerable mortality and poor prognosis. Corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), as a traditional remedy, have been widely used in the treatment of SJS/TEN. Recent studies have reported the potential therapeutic benefits of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists on the disease. However, the optimal treatment remains unknown. This study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TNF-α antagonist adalimumab conjunction with corticosteroid to traditional remedy on SJS/TEN. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we enrolled 53 SJS/TEN patients received either traditional remedy (Corticosteroids and IVIG) or a combination therapy (TNF-α antagonist conjunction with corticosteroid). The primary endpoint was duration of hospitalization and re-epithelization time, and the secondary endpoints including exposure time to high-dose steroids, and major adverse event incidence. 26 patients received traditional remedy and 27 patients received combination remedy. In comparison to traditional remedy, the combination remedy reduced the hospitalization duration (25 ± 4.7 vs. 22 ± 5.2 days; P = 0.032), re-epithelization time (19 ± 2.5 vs.17 ± 3.4 days; P = 0.019), and exposure time to high-dose steroids (18 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 2 days; P = 0.025). Obviously, TNF-α levels in the combination group showed a significant decreased on the discharge day comparing to the traditional group (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 5.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.001). The major adverse event incidences were no significant statistically difference (P > 0.05) within 6 months of follow-up after hospital discharge, and no death happened between two groups. The combination remedy (adalimumab conjunction with corticosteroid) could be an optimal treatment to promote disease recovery without increasing adverse events and morality in SJS/TEN patients.

阿达木单抗联合皮质类固醇疗法治疗史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死症
Stevens-Johnson综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(SJS/TEN)是一种严重的急性粘膜皮肤反应,死亡率高,预后差。皮质类固醇和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)作为一种传统的治疗方法,已被广泛应用于SJS/TEN的治疗。最近的研究报道了肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)拮抗剂对该疾病的潜在治疗益处。然而,最佳的治疗方法仍然未知。本研究旨在比较TNF-α拮抗剂阿达木单抗联合皮质类固醇与传统药物治疗SJS/TEN的有效性和安全性。在这项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究中,我们纳入了53例SJS/TEN患者,他们接受了传统治疗(皮质类固醇和IVIG)或联合治疗(TNF-α拮抗剂联合皮质类固醇)。主要终点是住院时间和再上皮化时间,次要终点包括大剂量类固醇暴露时间和主要不良事件发生率。传统治疗26例,联合治疗27例。与传统治疗相比,联合治疗缩短住院时间(25±4.7∶22±5.2)天;P = 0.032),再上皮时间(19±2.5 vs.17±3.4 d);P = 0.019),高剂量类固醇暴露时间(18±4 vs. 16±2天;p = 0.025)。与传统治疗组相比,联合治疗组在出院当天TNF-α水平明显降低(3.9±1.8比5.8±2.2,p = 0.001)。两组患者出院后随访6个月内主要不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),两组无死亡病例发生。联合治疗(阿达木单抗联合皮质类固醇)可能是促进疾病恢复而不增加SJS/TEN患者不良事件和道德的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信