Comparative 4E-Analysis of A KCS11 with and without Solar Energy for Fluegas Waste Heat Recovery in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Goutam Khankari, Sumit Srivastava, Rajib Khan, D. V. Rajan, Dinesh Kr. Singh
{"title":"Comparative 4E-Analysis of A KCS11 with and without Solar Energy for Fluegas Waste Heat Recovery in a Coal-Fired Power Plant","authors":"Goutam Khankari,&nbsp;Sumit Srivastava,&nbsp;Rajib Khan,&nbsp;D. V. Rajan,&nbsp;Dinesh Kr. Singh","doi":"10.1134/S0040601524700848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comparative performance analysis of a Kalina Cycle System 11 (KCS11) without and with solar energy is done based on 4E-analysis (energy, exergy, environment, and economic) for generating additional electricity from fluegas waste energy of a 660 MWe Supercritical (SupC) coal-fired power plant. The result shows that the integration of solar assisted KCS11 with main steam power plant increases the net plant energy and exergy efficiencies by about 0.04 and 0.03% points, respectively due to additional electricity generation of 647.43 kW at 40 K of superheat. Condenser and evaporator are the maximum contributor of energy and exergy losses, respectively in the proposed systems. Energetic performance of solar assisted Kalina cycle is higher than the standalone KCS11 due to decrease in turbine exhaust pressure and additional poor exergetic performance of solar heater causes less exergy efficient of solar assisted KCS11 compared to standalone KCS11. Use of solar integrated KCS11 reduces the annual <span>\\({\\text{C}}{{{\\text{O}}}_{{\\text{2}}}}\\)</span> emission by about 1089.58 t at full load which is nearly 1.25 times higher than the standalone KCS11. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) for producing additional electricity by solar energy at 40 K of super-heat is about 0.13 $/kW h which is 8.5% lower value compared to the solar thermal power plant.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"72 3","pages":"229 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative performance analysis of a Kalina Cycle System 11 (KCS11) without and with solar energy is done based on 4E-analysis (energy, exergy, environment, and economic) for generating additional electricity from fluegas waste energy of a 660 MWe Supercritical (SupC) coal-fired power plant. The result shows that the integration of solar assisted KCS11 with main steam power plant increases the net plant energy and exergy efficiencies by about 0.04 and 0.03% points, respectively due to additional electricity generation of 647.43 kW at 40 K of superheat. Condenser and evaporator are the maximum contributor of energy and exergy losses, respectively in the proposed systems. Energetic performance of solar assisted Kalina cycle is higher than the standalone KCS11 due to decrease in turbine exhaust pressure and additional poor exergetic performance of solar heater causes less exergy efficient of solar assisted KCS11 compared to standalone KCS11. Use of solar integrated KCS11 reduces the annual \({\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}\) emission by about 1089.58 t at full load which is nearly 1.25 times higher than the standalone KCS11. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) for producing additional electricity by solar energy at 40 K of super-heat is about 0.13 $/kW h which is 8.5% lower value compared to the solar thermal power plant.

Abstract Image

在燃煤发电厂使用和不使用太阳能回收烟气余热的 KCS11 的 4E 对比分析
基于4e分析(能源、能源、环境和经济),对Kalina循环系统11 (KCS11)利用660兆瓦超临界(SupC)燃煤电厂的烟气废能发电进行了无太阳能和有太阳能的对比性能分析。结果表明,太阳能辅助KCS11与主蒸汽电厂集成后,电厂净能量效率和火用效率分别提高了0.04和0.03左右% points, respectively due to additional electricity generation of 647.43 kW at 40 K of superheat. Condenser and evaporator are the maximum contributor of energy and exergy losses, respectively in the proposed systems. Energetic performance of solar assisted Kalina cycle is higher than the standalone KCS11 due to decrease in turbine exhaust pressure and additional poor exergetic performance of solar heater causes less exergy efficient of solar assisted KCS11 compared to standalone KCS11. Use of solar integrated KCS11 reduces the annual \({\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}\) emission by about 1089.58 t at full load which is nearly 1.25 times higher than the standalone KCS11. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) for producing additional electricity by solar energy at 40 K of super-heat is about 0.13 $/kW h which is 8.5% lower value compared to the solar thermal power plant.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信