How much more carbon could be protected in mature and old-growth forests of the United States?

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Richard A. Birdsey , Dominick A. DellaSala , Wayne Walker , Seth Gorelik
{"title":"How much more carbon could be protected in mature and old-growth forests of the United States?","authors":"Richard A. Birdsey ,&nbsp;Dominick A. DellaSala ,&nbsp;Wayne Walker ,&nbsp;Seth Gorelik","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mature and old-growth (MOG) forests are superior to younger forests for mitigating the climate and biodiversity crises. MOG forests store far more carbon per hectare than younger forests, and continue to accumulate carbon for centuries if not logged or severely disturbed. However, forest and climate policies have not fully protected older forests and large trees for these benefits despite public concerns. Here, we document our novel approach to link remote sensing of MOG structural stages with the USDA Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data to estimate forest area and carbon stocks by conterminous U.S. regions, landowner class, protection status, and maturity class. We found the greatest stock of carbon and area in mature forests (31.5B Mg, 156.5 M ha), followed by young forests (12.8B Mg, 71.9 M ha), and old-growth forests (7.9B Mg C, 35.3 M ha). Old-growth forests had the greatest carbon density (224 MgC ha<sup>−1</sup>), followed by mature (201 MgC ha<sup>−1</sup>), and young (178 MgC ha<sup>−1</sup>). Only about 18 % of the current stock of carbon in MOG forests is protected from logging. Protecting MOG from commercial timber harvest, while allowing mature forests to grow into old-growth forests, could increase accumulated forest carbon stocks by 10.8B Mg this century, comparable to 8 years of fossil fuel emissions in the United States. Stricter prohibitions from logging on Inventoried Roadless Areas of National Forests would account for 2.9B MgC increase. Avoiding logging of old-growth forests and large trees in mature forests would protect and increase this valuable carbon stock that cannot be replaced in the near term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"306 ","pages":"Article 111114"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500151X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mature and old-growth (MOG) forests are superior to younger forests for mitigating the climate and biodiversity crises. MOG forests store far more carbon per hectare than younger forests, and continue to accumulate carbon for centuries if not logged or severely disturbed. However, forest and climate policies have not fully protected older forests and large trees for these benefits despite public concerns. Here, we document our novel approach to link remote sensing of MOG structural stages with the USDA Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data to estimate forest area and carbon stocks by conterminous U.S. regions, landowner class, protection status, and maturity class. We found the greatest stock of carbon and area in mature forests (31.5B Mg, 156.5 M ha), followed by young forests (12.8B Mg, 71.9 M ha), and old-growth forests (7.9B Mg C, 35.3 M ha). Old-growth forests had the greatest carbon density (224 MgC ha−1), followed by mature (201 MgC ha−1), and young (178 MgC ha−1). Only about 18 % of the current stock of carbon in MOG forests is protected from logging. Protecting MOG from commercial timber harvest, while allowing mature forests to grow into old-growth forests, could increase accumulated forest carbon stocks by 10.8B Mg this century, comparable to 8 years of fossil fuel emissions in the United States. Stricter prohibitions from logging on Inventoried Roadless Areas of National Forests would account for 2.9B MgC increase. Avoiding logging of old-growth forests and large trees in mature forests would protect and increase this valuable carbon stock that cannot be replaced in the near term.
在美国的成熟和原始森林中,还能保护多少碳?
在缓解气候和生物多样性危机方面,成熟和老年林(MOG)优于年轻林。MOG森林每公顷储存的碳远远超过年轻的森林,如果不被砍伐或受到严重干扰,它们将在几个世纪内继续积累碳。然而,森林和气候政策并没有充分保护老森林和大树,尽管公众对此表示担忧。在这里,我们记录了我们的新方法,将MOG结构阶段的遥感与美国农业部林业局的森林清查和分析(FIA)数据联系起来,以估计美国相邻地区、土地所有者类别、保护状态和成熟度类别的森林面积和碳储量。碳储量和面积以成熟林最大(31.5B Mg, 156.5 M ha),其次是幼林(12.8B Mg, 71.9 M ha)和原生林(7.9B Mg C, 35.3 M ha)。原生林的碳密度最大(224 MgC ha−1),其次是成熟林(201 MgC ha−1)和幼林(178 MgC ha−1)。在MOG森林中,目前只有18%的碳储量受到保护,不受砍伐。保护MOG免受商业木材采伐,同时允许成熟森林成长为原生林,可在本世纪使森林累积碳储量增加108亿毫克,相当于美国8年的化石燃料排放量。更严格的禁止在国家森林无路地区伐木将导致29亿美元的MgC增长。避免砍伐原始森林和成熟森林中的大树将保护和增加这种短期内无法替代的宝贵碳储量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信