Hiding in plain sight: Reinvasion risk from retained seed after dispersal events in introduced conifers

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Thomas F. Carlin , Tyler P. Roberts , Matthew B. Scott , Ryan S. Vorster , Carol A. Rolando , Thomas S H Paul
{"title":"Hiding in plain sight: Reinvasion risk from retained seed after dispersal events in introduced conifers","authors":"Thomas F. Carlin ,&nbsp;Tyler P. Roberts ,&nbsp;Matthew B. Scott ,&nbsp;Ryan S. Vorster ,&nbsp;Carol A. Rolando ,&nbsp;Thomas S H Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-native conifers are the most successful tree-weeds in the Southern Hemisphere, reproducing annually through seed-bearing cones. Rather than shedding cones, some conifer species retain cones on the tree indefinitely (e.g. <em>Pinus contorta</em>), meaning cones persist on the tree even after mortality via common foliar applied herbicide-based control methods. We investigated whether open cones could present a reinvasion risk by retaining seeds after their primary dispersal event and disseminating them over time. We found that 19 % of open cones retained viable seed after opening, with an average of 3.5 viable seeds (ranging from 1-39) per cone. The oldest cone retaining viable seed was 15 years old. The majority of seeds had separated from their wing 6 years after the initial cone opening, however intact wings were recovered up to 11 years post cone opening. These results suggest that cones can still contribute to propagule pressure even after their main dispersal event, potentially leading to the reinvasion of sites years after control operations. However, as the majority of seeds detach from their wings only a few years after cone opening their dispersal ability is hampered and reinvasion would likely occur close to the parent tree.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-native conifers are the most successful tree-weeds in the Southern Hemisphere, reproducing annually through seed-bearing cones. Rather than shedding cones, some conifer species retain cones on the tree indefinitely (e.g. Pinus contorta), meaning cones persist on the tree even after mortality via common foliar applied herbicide-based control methods. We investigated whether open cones could present a reinvasion risk by retaining seeds after their primary dispersal event and disseminating them over time. We found that 19 % of open cones retained viable seed after opening, with an average of 3.5 viable seeds (ranging from 1-39) per cone. The oldest cone retaining viable seed was 15 years old. The majority of seeds had separated from their wing 6 years after the initial cone opening, however intact wings were recovered up to 11 years post cone opening. These results suggest that cones can still contribute to propagule pressure even after their main dispersal event, potentially leading to the reinvasion of sites years after control operations. However, as the majority of seeds detach from their wings only a few years after cone opening their dispersal ability is hampered and reinvasion would likely occur close to the parent tree.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信