In vitro susceptibility study of Amblyomma cohaerens and Rhipicepalus (Boophilus) decoloratus tick species to amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % acaricides in Jimma town, Ethiopia
{"title":"In vitro susceptibility study of Amblyomma cohaerens and Rhipicepalus (Boophilus) decoloratus tick species to amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % acaricides in Jimma town, Ethiopia","authors":"Tamene Lemma , Eba Alemayehu Simma , Tesfaye Rufael , Sileshi Mekonnen , Delenasaw Yewhalaw","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study was conducted to evaluate the <em>in vitro</em> efficacy of amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % against <em>Amblyomma cohaerens</em> and <em>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus</em>, and also to assess acaricide resistance using the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) in Jimma town, Oromia region, southwest Ethiopia. A total of 180 engorged adult female ticks of the two species (90 <em>A. cohaerens</em> and 90 <em>R. decoloratus</em>) were collected from local and crossbred cattle managed under extensive and semi-intensive systems. The ticks were immersed in amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % at field-recommended concentrations, and in distilled water for the control groups, for two minutes. Afterward, they were placed in an incubator at 27°C and 85 % RH for seven days. The oviposition responses of <em>A</em>. <em>cohaerens</em> and <em>R. decoloratus</em> were monitored regularly. The efficacy of each acaricide was assessed by comparing the mean egg mass laid by treated and untreated tick groups. The study results showed that ticks treated with amitraz 12.5 % died and did not lay eggs, while some ticks treated with diazinon 60 % survived and laid eggs after a seven-day incubation period. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two acaricides in controlling egg-laying in both species of ticks. The ticks in the control group that were treated with water survived and laid eggs. Amitraz 12.5 % at the field-recommended concentration achieved 100 % control, whereas diazinon 60 % achieved 91.3 % control. The study shows that both amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % significantly reduced egg laying in <em>A. cohaerens</em> and <em>R. decoloratus</em> ticks. The results also demonstrate that amitraz 12.5 % is more effective in controlling ticks and that there is a sign of emerging resistance of ticks to diazinon 60 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 110461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440172500072X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % against Amblyomma cohaerens and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, and also to assess acaricide resistance using the Adult Immersion Test (AIT) in Jimma town, Oromia region, southwest Ethiopia. A total of 180 engorged adult female ticks of the two species (90 A. cohaerens and 90 R. decoloratus) were collected from local and crossbred cattle managed under extensive and semi-intensive systems. The ticks were immersed in amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % at field-recommended concentrations, and in distilled water for the control groups, for two minutes. Afterward, they were placed in an incubator at 27°C and 85 % RH for seven days. The oviposition responses of A. cohaerens and R. decoloratus were monitored regularly. The efficacy of each acaricide was assessed by comparing the mean egg mass laid by treated and untreated tick groups. The study results showed that ticks treated with amitraz 12.5 % died and did not lay eggs, while some ticks treated with diazinon 60 % survived and laid eggs after a seven-day incubation period. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the two acaricides in controlling egg-laying in both species of ticks. The ticks in the control group that were treated with water survived and laid eggs. Amitraz 12.5 % at the field-recommended concentration achieved 100 % control, whereas diazinon 60 % achieved 91.3 % control. The study shows that both amitraz 12.5 % and diazinon 60 % significantly reduced egg laying in A. cohaerens and R. decoloratus ticks. The results also demonstrate that amitraz 12.5 % is more effective in controlling ticks and that there is a sign of emerging resistance of ticks to diazinon 60 %.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.