Association between the presence of passengers and at-fault crash risk among older drivers with and without cognitive decline

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Masao Ichikawa , Haruhiko Inada , Hanae Kosuge , Nobuaki Takubo
{"title":"Association between the presence of passengers and at-fault crash risk among older drivers with and without cognitive decline","authors":"Masao Ichikawa ,&nbsp;Haruhiko Inada ,&nbsp;Hanae Kosuge ,&nbsp;Nobuaki Takubo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction</em>: Older drivers, especially those with cognitive decline, should be supported in continuing to drive safely, given their lowered driving abilities, limited alternative transportation options, and the adverse health outcomes associated with driving cessation. One potential strategy to reduce crash risk is having passengers as co-pilots. Therefore, we investigated whether the presence of passengers was associated with at-fault crash risk among older drivers with different cognitive statuses. <em>Methods:</em> Using nationwide police-reported crash data linked with driver licensing data, which includes cognitive assessment results at license renewal, for all licensed drivers aged 75 years or older in Japan, we conducted a culpability analysis among those involved in car-to-car crashes from 2014 to 2020. The analysis compared the exposure status (presence of passengers at the time of crash) between drivers responsible for the crash and drivers not responsible. We used logistic regression to estimate at-fault crash risk associated with passengers, controlling for potential confounders, separately for male or female drivers with suspected dementia, slight cognitive decline, or no cognitive decline. <em>Results:</em> Our crash data included 108,945 responsible and 56,783 non-responsible drivers. Among male drivers, 15% to 16% of responsible drivers and 29% to 33% of non-responsible drivers were accompanied by passengers at the time of crash, depending on their cognitive status. Among female drivers, 10% to 11% of responsible drivers and 26% to 27% of non-responsible drivers had passengers. The strength of the association did not vary largely across cognitive statuses among both male and female drivers, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 0.36 to 0.43 for males and from 0.30 to 0.32 for females. <em>Conclusion:</em> The presence of passengers was associated with lower at-fault crash risk among older drivers, regardless of their cognitive status. <em>Practical applications:</em> Our findings suggest the potential role of passengers in enhancing the safety of older drivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 348-353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243752500060X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older drivers, especially those with cognitive decline, should be supported in continuing to drive safely, given their lowered driving abilities, limited alternative transportation options, and the adverse health outcomes associated with driving cessation. One potential strategy to reduce crash risk is having passengers as co-pilots. Therefore, we investigated whether the presence of passengers was associated with at-fault crash risk among older drivers with different cognitive statuses. Methods: Using nationwide police-reported crash data linked with driver licensing data, which includes cognitive assessment results at license renewal, for all licensed drivers aged 75 years or older in Japan, we conducted a culpability analysis among those involved in car-to-car crashes from 2014 to 2020. The analysis compared the exposure status (presence of passengers at the time of crash) between drivers responsible for the crash and drivers not responsible. We used logistic regression to estimate at-fault crash risk associated with passengers, controlling for potential confounders, separately for male or female drivers with suspected dementia, slight cognitive decline, or no cognitive decline. Results: Our crash data included 108,945 responsible and 56,783 non-responsible drivers. Among male drivers, 15% to 16% of responsible drivers and 29% to 33% of non-responsible drivers were accompanied by passengers at the time of crash, depending on their cognitive status. Among female drivers, 10% to 11% of responsible drivers and 26% to 27% of non-responsible drivers had passengers. The strength of the association did not vary largely across cognitive statuses among both male and female drivers, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 0.36 to 0.43 for males and from 0.30 to 0.32 for females. Conclusion: The presence of passengers was associated with lower at-fault crash risk among older drivers, regardless of their cognitive status. Practical applications: Our findings suggest the potential role of passengers in enhancing the safety of older drivers.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信