Impact of pet ownership and animal-assisted therapy on suicidal ideation and suicide deaths: A scoping review

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Carl Zhou , Nicholas Fabiano , Stanley Wong , Philip Yu , Henry Cheng , Risa Shorr , Marco Solmi
{"title":"Impact of pet ownership and animal-assisted therapy on suicidal ideation and suicide deaths: A scoping review","authors":"Carl Zhou ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fabiano ,&nbsp;Stanley Wong ,&nbsp;Philip Yu ,&nbsp;Henry Cheng ,&nbsp;Risa Shorr ,&nbsp;Marco Solmi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2025.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is growing research on therapeutic benefits of animals. However, their impact on suicide-related outcomes such as suicidal ideation (SI), suicide attempts (SA), and suicide deaths remains unclear. This scoping review consolidates existing literature on the role of pet ownership and animal assisted therapy (AAT) on suicide-related outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted up to March 10, 2025. Articles reporting the impact of pet ownership or AAT on SI, SA, or suicide deaths were included. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate, with risk of bias assessed using appropriate tools for each study design except for case reports and interviews. Study findings were descriptively summarized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>25 studies were included: one RCT, five pre- and post-studies, two cohort studies, one case-control study, three case reports/series, and 13 surveys/interviews. For pet ownership, a cohort study (n=709) found a positive association between time with dog and SI (r=0.17, p&lt;0.001). Two other observational studies yielded non-significant results against suicide deaths. For AAT, one pre- and post-study of veterans (n=71) reported significant SI reductions (t(54)=4.87, p&lt;0.001) while another pre- and post-study of adolescents (n=30) also found significant SI reductions (χ² McNemar=6.75; p&lt;0.05). Four other experimental studies, including one RCT, yielded non-significant results. Qualitative findings suggested pet ownership and AAT may have a perceived protective effect against SI. No articles reported on SA. Most articles had a high or moderate risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While there is a reported perceived protective effect of pet ownership and AAT against SI, the evidence for pet ownership and AAT remains inconclusive in relations to SI, SA, and suicide deaths. Future research should focus on high-quality with stringent methodology, large-scale, experimental studies with standardized outcome measures to clarify the role of animals in suicide prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"39 3","pages":"Article 100309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616325000205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is growing research on therapeutic benefits of animals. However, their impact on suicide-related outcomes such as suicidal ideation (SI), suicide attempts (SA), and suicide deaths remains unclear. This scoping review consolidates existing literature on the role of pet ownership and animal assisted therapy (AAT) on suicide-related outcomes.

Methods

A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted up to March 10, 2025. Articles reporting the impact of pet ownership or AAT on SI, SA, or suicide deaths were included. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate, with risk of bias assessed using appropriate tools for each study design except for case reports and interviews. Study findings were descriptively summarized.

Results

25 studies were included: one RCT, five pre- and post-studies, two cohort studies, one case-control study, three case reports/series, and 13 surveys/interviews. For pet ownership, a cohort study (n=709) found a positive association between time with dog and SI (r=0.17, p<0.001). Two other observational studies yielded non-significant results against suicide deaths. For AAT, one pre- and post-study of veterans (n=71) reported significant SI reductions (t(54)=4.87, p<0.001) while another pre- and post-study of adolescents (n=30) also found significant SI reductions (χ² McNemar=6.75; p<0.05). Four other experimental studies, including one RCT, yielded non-significant results. Qualitative findings suggested pet ownership and AAT may have a perceived protective effect against SI. No articles reported on SA. Most articles had a high or moderate risk of bias.

Conclusion

While there is a reported perceived protective effect of pet ownership and AAT against SI, the evidence for pet ownership and AAT remains inconclusive in relations to SI, SA, and suicide deaths. Future research should focus on high-quality with stringent methodology, large-scale, experimental studies with standardized outcome measures to clarify the role of animals in suicide prevention.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信