AEC perceptions on DFMA collaboration and supporting technologies for prefabricated housing in Australia and New Zealand

Rongrong Yu , Ning Gu , Tingting Liu , Hong Guan , Erwin Oh , Sormeh Sharifi , Ruidong Chang
{"title":"AEC perceptions on DFMA collaboration and supporting technologies for prefabricated housing in Australia and New Zealand","authors":"Rongrong Yu ,&nbsp;Ning Gu ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Hong Guan ,&nbsp;Erwin Oh ,&nbsp;Sormeh Sharifi ,&nbsp;Ruidong Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadr.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents survey results regarding Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) professionals' perceptions about Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DFMA) collaboration for prefabricated housing in Australia and New Zealand, and perceptions about its supporting digital technologies. Prefabricated Construction (PC) provides a viable and promising approach for addressing Australia and New Zealand's current housing crisis, by enhanced delivery of housing projects, due to PC's numerous benefits such as faster delivery, better quality control, cost benefits, and greater sustainability performance. DFMA principles encourage consideration of manufacturing and assembly knowledge in the early design stage, since that allows stakeholders to work collaboratively during the early design stage to increase constructability and productivity. Hence the effective application of DFMA methodology to enhance PC projects represents a key goal for current prefabrication practices. However, the application of DFMA principles to PC currently remains very limited and challenging, and currently there is a lack of digital technologies for supporting DFMA application using an integrated holistic design approach. To address these issues, this study surveyed 50 design and construction professionals in Australia and New Zealand, regarding their professional views and insights into the issues. The results suggest that some main current barriers against implementing DFMA in PC projects, has been the stakeholders' level of understanding of DFMA, as well as stakeholders' extent of collaboration and limitations in communication. Additionally, the results suggest that current barriers for applying digital technologies to DFMA collaboration in PC projects are cost hesitancy, limits of stakeholders' digital skillsets, lack of industry readiness, as well as barriers around digital integration and interoperability of digital tools. The study has identified a strong future need in Australia and New Zealand for implementation of DFMA principles into PC projects, and a need for further development of associated digital technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100031,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Design Research","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 115-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949782525000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents survey results regarding Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) professionals' perceptions about Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DFMA) collaboration for prefabricated housing in Australia and New Zealand, and perceptions about its supporting digital technologies. Prefabricated Construction (PC) provides a viable and promising approach for addressing Australia and New Zealand's current housing crisis, by enhanced delivery of housing projects, due to PC's numerous benefits such as faster delivery, better quality control, cost benefits, and greater sustainability performance. DFMA principles encourage consideration of manufacturing and assembly knowledge in the early design stage, since that allows stakeholders to work collaboratively during the early design stage to increase constructability and productivity. Hence the effective application of DFMA methodology to enhance PC projects represents a key goal for current prefabrication practices. However, the application of DFMA principles to PC currently remains very limited and challenging, and currently there is a lack of digital technologies for supporting DFMA application using an integrated holistic design approach. To address these issues, this study surveyed 50 design and construction professionals in Australia and New Zealand, regarding their professional views and insights into the issues. The results suggest that some main current barriers against implementing DFMA in PC projects, has been the stakeholders' level of understanding of DFMA, as well as stakeholders' extent of collaboration and limitations in communication. Additionally, the results suggest that current barriers for applying digital technologies to DFMA collaboration in PC projects are cost hesitancy, limits of stakeholders' digital skillsets, lack of industry readiness, as well as barriers around digital integration and interoperability of digital tools. The study has identified a strong future need in Australia and New Zealand for implementation of DFMA principles into PC projects, and a need for further development of associated digital technologies.
AEC对澳大利亚和新西兰预制房屋DFMA合作和支持技术的看法
本文介绍了关于建筑、工程和施工(AEC)专业人士对澳大利亚和新西兰预制房屋设计制造和组装(DFMA)合作的看法,以及对其支持数字技术的看法的调查结果。预制建筑(PC)为解决澳大利亚和新西兰目前的住房危机提供了一种可行和有前途的方法,通过加强住房项目的交付,由于PC的许多好处,如更快的交付,更好的质量控制,成本效益和更大的可持续性表现。DFMA原则鼓励在早期设计阶段考虑制造和装配知识,因为这允许利益相关者在早期设计阶段协同工作,以提高可构造性和生产力。因此,有效地应用DFMA方法来增强PC项目代表了当前预制实践的关键目标。然而,DFMA原理在PC上的应用目前仍然非常有限和具有挑战性,目前缺乏使用集成整体设计方法支持DFMA应用的数字技术。为了解决这些问题,本研究调查了澳大利亚和新西兰的50位设计和建筑专业人士,了解他们对这些问题的专业观点和见解。结果表明,目前在PC项目中实施DFMA的一些主要障碍是利益相关者对DFMA的理解水平,以及利益相关者的合作程度和沟通限制。此外,结果表明,目前将数字技术应用于PC项目中DFMA协作的障碍是成本犹豫、利益相关者数字技能的限制、缺乏行业准备,以及围绕数字集成和数字工具互操作性的障碍。该研究确定了澳大利亚和新西兰在PC项目中实施DFMA原则的强烈未来需求,以及进一步发展相关数字技术的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信