ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PREEMPTIVE CELECOXIB OR TRAMADOL/ACETAMINOPHEN ADDED TO STANDARD POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
SOO-HO KIM , SOMI KIM , YOON-SEON KIM , MI-KYOUNG SONG , JI-YEON KANG
{"title":"ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PREEMPTIVE CELECOXIB OR TRAMADOL/ACETAMINOPHEN ADDED TO STANDARD POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL","authors":"SOO-HO KIM ,&nbsp;SOMI KIM ,&nbsp;YOON-SEON KIM ,&nbsp;MI-KYOUNG SONG ,&nbsp;JI-YEON KANG","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding single-dose preemptive celecoxib 200 mg (<em>Cc</em>) or tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325.0 mg (<em>T/A</em>) to standard postoperative analgesia after impacted mandibular third molar extraction, a design not previously explored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover within-subject study, participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups (<em>Cc</em> or placebo for group A; <em>T/A</em> or placebo for group B) and underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction on both sides at 1-month intervals. Along with baseline characteristics, pain intensity in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), first perceived pain occurrence, rescue medication use, and adverse events were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 33 participants per group completed the trial. <em>Cc</em> reduced pain at 3 (−0.91 ± 2.17; <em>P</em> = .011) and 6 hours (−0.85 ± 2.24; <em>P</em> = .018), while <em>T/A</em> reduced pain at 1 (−1.40 ± 2.37; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), 2 (−0.79 ± 2.32; <em>P</em> = .030), and 6 hours (−0.91 ± 1.94; <em>P</em> = .006) postextraction, with some insignificant reductions at other times. Both <em>Cc</em> and <em>T/A</em> were effective in reducing the first perceived pain. Notably, <em>Cc</em> significantly decreased pain intensity, <em>T/A</em> significantly delayed the pain perception. Both drugs had no significant effect on the need for rescue medication or adverse event rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on these results, both <em>Cc</em> and <em>T/A</em> appears to aid in reducing postoperative pain following impacted mandibular third molar extraction without significant adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 3","pages":"Article 102135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding single-dose preemptive celecoxib 200 mg (Cc) or tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325.0 mg (T/A) to standard postoperative analgesia after impacted mandibular third molar extraction, a design not previously explored.

Methods

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover within-subject study, participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups (Cc or placebo for group A; T/A or placebo for group B) and underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction on both sides at 1-month intervals. Along with baseline characteristics, pain intensity in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), first perceived pain occurrence, rescue medication use, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

A total of 33 participants per group completed the trial. Cc reduced pain at 3 (−0.91 ± 2.17; P = .011) and 6 hours (−0.85 ± 2.24; P = .018), while T/A reduced pain at 1 (−1.40 ± 2.37; P < .001), 2 (−0.79 ± 2.32; P = .030), and 6 hours (−0.91 ± 1.94; P = .006) postextraction, with some insignificant reductions at other times. Both Cc and T/A were effective in reducing the first perceived pain. Notably, Cc significantly decreased pain intensity, T/A significantly delayed the pain perception. Both drugs had no significant effect on the need for rescue medication or adverse event rates.

Conclusions

Based on these results, both Cc and T/A appears to aid in reducing postoperative pain following impacted mandibular third molar extraction without significant adverse effects.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信