ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PREEMPTIVE CELECOXIB OR TRAMADOL/ACETAMINOPHEN ADDED TO STANDARD POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
SOO-HO KIM , SOMI KIM , YOON-SEON KIM , MI-KYOUNG SONG , JI-YEON KANG
{"title":"ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF PREEMPTIVE CELECOXIB OR TRAMADOL/ACETAMINOPHEN ADDED TO STANDARD POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL","authors":"SOO-HO KIM , SOMI KIM , YOON-SEON KIM , MI-KYOUNG SONG , JI-YEON KANG","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding single-dose preemptive celecoxib 200 mg (<em>Cc</em>) or tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325.0 mg (<em>T/A</em>) to standard postoperative analgesia after impacted mandibular third molar extraction, a design not previously explored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover within-subject study, participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups (<em>Cc</em> or placebo for group A; <em>T/A</em> or placebo for group B) and underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction on both sides at 1-month intervals. Along with baseline characteristics, pain intensity in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), first perceived pain occurrence, rescue medication use, and adverse events were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 33 participants per group completed the trial. <em>Cc</em> reduced pain at 3 (−0.91 ± 2.17; <em>P</em> = .011) and 6 hours (−0.85 ± 2.24; <em>P</em> = .018), while <em>T/A</em> reduced pain at 1 (−1.40 ± 2.37; <em>P</em> < .001), 2 (−0.79 ± 2.32; <em>P</em> = .030), and 6 hours (−0.91 ± 1.94; <em>P</em> = .006) postextraction, with some insignificant reductions at other times. Both <em>Cc</em> and <em>T/A</em> were effective in reducing the first perceived pain. Notably, <em>Cc</em> significantly decreased pain intensity, <em>T/A</em> significantly delayed the pain perception. Both drugs had no significant effect on the need for rescue medication or adverse event rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on these results, both <em>Cc</em> and <em>T/A</em> appears to aid in reducing postoperative pain following impacted mandibular third molar extraction without significant adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 3","pages":"Article 102135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding single-dose preemptive celecoxib 200 mg (Cc) or tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325.0 mg (T/A) to standard postoperative analgesia after impacted mandibular third molar extraction, a design not previously explored.
Methods
In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover within-subject study, participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups (Cc or placebo for group A; T/A or placebo for group B) and underwent impacted mandibular third molar extraction on both sides at 1-month intervals. Along with baseline characteristics, pain intensity in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), first perceived pain occurrence, rescue medication use, and adverse events were evaluated.
Results
A total of 33 participants per group completed the trial. Cc reduced pain at 3 (−0.91 ± 2.17; P = .011) and 6 hours (−0.85 ± 2.24; P = .018), while T/A reduced pain at 1 (−1.40 ± 2.37; P < .001), 2 (−0.79 ± 2.32; P = .030), and 6 hours (−0.91 ± 1.94; P = .006) postextraction, with some insignificant reductions at other times. Both Cc and T/A were effective in reducing the first perceived pain. Notably, Cc significantly decreased pain intensity, T/A significantly delayed the pain perception. Both drugs had no significant effect on the need for rescue medication or adverse event rates.
Conclusions
Based on these results, both Cc and T/A appears to aid in reducing postoperative pain following impacted mandibular third molar extraction without significant adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.