A. Rodriguez-Hernandez , O. Martínez-Sáez , F. Brasó-Maristany , B. Conte , R. Gómez , I. García-Fructuoso , B. Fratini , E. Segui , M. Potrony , E. Sanfeliu , S. Cobo , P. Galvan , L. Moreno , E. Grau , M.R. Aceituno , J.A. Puig-Butille , J. Oriola , G. Goberna , P. Blasco , O. Castillo , B. Adamo
{"title":"Prevalence and clinical impact of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer: a descriptive large single-center study","authors":"A. Rodriguez-Hernandez , O. Martínez-Sáez , F. Brasó-Maristany , B. Conte , R. Gómez , I. García-Fructuoso , B. Fratini , E. Segui , M. Potrony , E. Sanfeliu , S. Cobo , P. Galvan , L. Moreno , E. Grau , M.R. Aceituno , J.A. Puig-Butille , J. Oriola , G. Goberna , P. Blasco , O. Castillo , B. Adamo","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Germline (likely) pathogenic variants (PVs) are identified in 5%-10% of patients with breast cancer (BC) and play a critical role in guiding clinical management, including the use of targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). High-risk genes such as <em>BRCA1, BRCA2</em>, and <em>PALB2</em>, and moderate-risk genes such as <em>CHEK2</em> and <em>ATM</em>, influence BC risk and treatment decisions. This study evaluates the prevalence and clinical impact of PVs in a large consecutive cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 912 individuals with BC who underwent germline testing at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2016 to 2023. Genetic testing for 14 BC and Lynch syndrome genes was carried out using the TruSight Hereditary Cancer Panel. Statistical analyses were carried out to assess associations between germline results and clinical characteristics, including eligibility for PARPi therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 912 individuals, 129 (14.1%) had a PV, with <em>BRCA2</em> (31.8%) and <em>BRCA1</em> (24%) being the most frequently altered genes. Additionally, 16.2% carried variants of uncertain significance, most commonly in <em>ATM</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> genes. Patients with PV were younger compared with PV-negative individuals (median age: 43.5 versus 48.2 years, <em>P</em> = 0.006), more likely to have bilateral BC (13.3% versus 5.8%, <em>P</em> = 0.002), and more frequently diagnosed with triple-negative BC (TNBC; 28.7% versus 20.8%, <em>P</em> = 0.046). Of those with PVs, 39.1% completed a bilateral mastectomy, 36.7% had a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and 22.7% had both surgeries. PV detection was associated with higher stages at diagnosis (stage IV: 13.0% versus 5.9%, <em>P</em> < 0.001). In the metastatic cohort, 12.9% received PARPi therapy, with 80.7% harboring <em>BRCA1/2</em> PVs. In early BC, 13.1% met the criteria for adjuvant PARPi.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The identification of germline PVs significantly influences surgical decisions and systemic therapies. Genetic testing for patients with BC optimizes care, particularly in selecting candidates for PARPi in both early and advanced BC, improving management and prevention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 104543"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925004120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Germline (likely) pathogenic variants (PVs) are identified in 5%-10% of patients with breast cancer (BC) and play a critical role in guiding clinical management, including the use of targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). High-risk genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2, and moderate-risk genes such as CHEK2 and ATM, influence BC risk and treatment decisions. This study evaluates the prevalence and clinical impact of PVs in a large consecutive cohort.
Materials and methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 912 individuals with BC who underwent germline testing at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2016 to 2023. Genetic testing for 14 BC and Lynch syndrome genes was carried out using the TruSight Hereditary Cancer Panel. Statistical analyses were carried out to assess associations between germline results and clinical characteristics, including eligibility for PARPi therapy.
Results
Of the 912 individuals, 129 (14.1%) had a PV, with BRCA2 (31.8%) and BRCA1 (24%) being the most frequently altered genes. Additionally, 16.2% carried variants of uncertain significance, most commonly in ATM and BRCA2 genes. Patients with PV were younger compared with PV-negative individuals (median age: 43.5 versus 48.2 years, P = 0.006), more likely to have bilateral BC (13.3% versus 5.8%, P = 0.002), and more frequently diagnosed with triple-negative BC (TNBC; 28.7% versus 20.8%, P = 0.046). Of those with PVs, 39.1% completed a bilateral mastectomy, 36.7% had a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, and 22.7% had both surgeries. PV detection was associated with higher stages at diagnosis (stage IV: 13.0% versus 5.9%, P < 0.001). In the metastatic cohort, 12.9% received PARPi therapy, with 80.7% harboring BRCA1/2 PVs. In early BC, 13.1% met the criteria for adjuvant PARPi.
Conclusions
The identification of germline PVs significantly influences surgical decisions and systemic therapies. Genetic testing for patients with BC optimizes care, particularly in selecting candidates for PARPi in both early and advanced BC, improving management and prevention strategies.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.