{"title":"Executive stock ownership, debt choice, and the moderating effect of institutional owners","authors":"Vivek Bhargava , Mukesh Chaudhry , Daniel Huerta , Thanh Ngo","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how executive stock ownership influences the choice of debt structure, investigating whether institutional owners moderate the relationship between the level of executive ownership and the decision to use public versus private debt. Our findings suggest that firms with higher levels of executive ownership tend to employ significantly more public debt financing to potentially reduce the monitoring intensity of their managerial decisions. However, we also find that oversight by motivated and longer-horizon institutional investors prevents firms from avoiding the more stringent monitoring associated with privately held debt. Further tests indicate that the link between CEO and executive ownership levels and the preference for public debt is more pronounced in smaller firms, which typically experience higher levels of information asymmetry. Our findings align with the monitoring avoidance hypothesis and the informational asymmetry hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325000389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines how executive stock ownership influences the choice of debt structure, investigating whether institutional owners moderate the relationship between the level of executive ownership and the decision to use public versus private debt. Our findings suggest that firms with higher levels of executive ownership tend to employ significantly more public debt financing to potentially reduce the monitoring intensity of their managerial decisions. However, we also find that oversight by motivated and longer-horizon institutional investors prevents firms from avoiding the more stringent monitoring associated with privately held debt. Further tests indicate that the link between CEO and executive ownership levels and the preference for public debt is more pronounced in smaller firms, which typically experience higher levels of information asymmetry. Our findings align with the monitoring avoidance hypothesis and the informational asymmetry hypothesis.
期刊介绍:
Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.