Influence of land-use planning on public forests' vegetation cover: Insights from the Brazilian Amazon

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Iranilda Moraes , Claudia Azevedo-Ramos
{"title":"Influence of land-use planning on public forests' vegetation cover: Insights from the Brazilian Amazon","authors":"Iranilda Moraes ,&nbsp;Claudia Azevedo-Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Allocating Brazilian undesignated public forests (UPF) to specific land-use categories is advocated as essential for improved forest governance. In 2010, a 1.3-million-hectare area of UPF in eastern Amazon, known as the Mamuru-Arapiuns Glebas, underwent a land-use planning and allocation process. Over a decade later, the impact of this initiative on the region's forest cover remains unknown. Analyses of forest cover dynamics and land use within the newly created land categories were conducted in four-year intervals from 2006 to 2018. The results indicated a total forest cover loss of 50,017 ha (4 %), with annual rates increasing over the analyzed periods and a significant rise in deforestation and/or logging activities in some land categories following the land-use planning (e.g. in community areas, altered forests increased by an average of 641 ha/year). During the first post-planning period (T<sub>2</sub>), forest cover loss increased by 18 % compared to the pre-planning period (T<sub>1</sub>). In T<sub>3</sub>, the increase was 350 %, resulting in annual losses ranging from 1708 ha/year to 7690 ha/year. The findings reveal that while allocating UPF contributes to land-use governance in a specific region, it does not necessarily lead to reduced deforestation, depending on the chosen land-use category. Additionally, the study highlights that UPF allocation is only a first step, emphasizing the crucial need for implementing effective management tools in these areas to enhance the strategy's success and achieve better forest governance in the Amazon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"17 6","pages":"Article 100197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780225000277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allocating Brazilian undesignated public forests (UPF) to specific land-use categories is advocated as essential for improved forest governance. In 2010, a 1.3-million-hectare area of UPF in eastern Amazon, known as the Mamuru-Arapiuns Glebas, underwent a land-use planning and allocation process. Over a decade later, the impact of this initiative on the region's forest cover remains unknown. Analyses of forest cover dynamics and land use within the newly created land categories were conducted in four-year intervals from 2006 to 2018. The results indicated a total forest cover loss of 50,017 ha (4 %), with annual rates increasing over the analyzed periods and a significant rise in deforestation and/or logging activities in some land categories following the land-use planning (e.g. in community areas, altered forests increased by an average of 641 ha/year). During the first post-planning period (T2), forest cover loss increased by 18 % compared to the pre-planning period (T1). In T3, the increase was 350 %, resulting in annual losses ranging from 1708 ha/year to 7690 ha/year. The findings reveal that while allocating UPF contributes to land-use governance in a specific region, it does not necessarily lead to reduced deforestation, depending on the chosen land-use category. Additionally, the study highlights that UPF allocation is only a first step, emphasizing the crucial need for implementing effective management tools in these areas to enhance the strategy's success and achieve better forest governance in the Amazon.
土地利用规划对公共森林植被覆盖的影响:来自巴西亚马逊的见解
提倡将巴西的未指定公共森林分配给特定的土地使用类别,这是改善森林治理的必要条件。2010年,亚马逊东部一个130万公顷的UPF地区,即Mamuru-Arapiuns Glebas,经历了土地使用规划和分配过程。十多年过去了,这一举措对该地区森林覆盖的影响仍不得而知。从2006年到2018年,每隔四年对新创建的土地类别进行森林覆盖动态和土地利用分析。结果表明,森林覆盖总量减少了500,017 ha(4 %),在分析期间,年损失率增加,在土地利用规划之后,一些土地类别的毁林和/或伐木活动显著增加(例如,在社区地区,改变的森林平均增加641 ha/年)。在第一个规划后时期(T2),森林覆盖损失比规划前时期(T1)增加了18. %。T3增加了350 %,年损失在1708 ha/年到7690 ha/年之间。研究结果表明,尽管分配UPF有助于特定区域的土地利用治理,但它并不一定导致森林砍伐减少,这取决于所选择的土地利用类别。此外,该研究强调,UPF分配只是第一步,强调了在这些地区实施有效管理工具的关键必要性,以提高战略的成功程度,并在亚马逊地区实现更好的森林治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信