Nutrition-focused group intervention was not superior to social support in the treatment of depression: A randomized controlled trial with a strength-based counseling approach
Aino Kipfer , Tiina Laatikainen , Timo Partonen , Johanna Roponen , Outi Nuutinen , Marja-Leena Lamidi
{"title":"Nutrition-focused group intervention was not superior to social support in the treatment of depression: A randomized controlled trial with a strength-based counseling approach","authors":"Aino Kipfer , Tiina Laatikainen , Timo Partonen , Johanna Roponen , Outi Nuutinen , Marja-Leena Lamidi","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression is a public health challenge, negatively affecting health and work ability. While an association between diet and depression is recognized, only a few randomized controlled trials have been published on the impact of diet counseling on clinical depression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an 8-week randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a strength-based, motivational nutrition group intervention on symptoms of depression among individuals with a moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Participants (<em>n</em> = 93) were recruited from their healthcare units (<em>n</em> = 13) in Kuopio and Siilinjärvi, Eastern Finland, and randomized into the intervention or control arm. Both arms attended six group sessions. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Index of Diet Quality (IDQ), the Assessment of Quality of Life – 8D (AQoL-8D), and a work ability indicator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In both groups, there were only non-significant improvements in depression symptoms, diet quality, quality of life, and work ability at 8 weeks and 6 months. Based on the AQoL subscales, mental health significantly improved in the intervention but not in the control group. There were, however, no significant differences between the groups in any outcomes. The results were similar at 8 weeks and 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Blinding of the study participants was not possible. Only 55 % of the participants completed the follow-up at six months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The intervention was not effective in improving depression status or diet quality, in contrast to previous nutrition interventions for people with depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Depression is a public health challenge, negatively affecting health and work ability. While an association between diet and depression is recognized, only a few randomized controlled trials have been published on the impact of diet counseling on clinical depression.
Methods
We conducted an 8-week randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a strength-based, motivational nutrition group intervention on symptoms of depression among individuals with a moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Participants (n = 93) were recruited from their healthcare units (n = 13) in Kuopio and Siilinjärvi, Eastern Finland, and randomized into the intervention or control arm. Both arms attended six group sessions. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Index of Diet Quality (IDQ), the Assessment of Quality of Life – 8D (AQoL-8D), and a work ability indicator.
Results
In both groups, there were only non-significant improvements in depression symptoms, diet quality, quality of life, and work ability at 8 weeks and 6 months. Based on the AQoL subscales, mental health significantly improved in the intervention but not in the control group. There were, however, no significant differences between the groups in any outcomes. The results were similar at 8 weeks and 6 months.
Limitations
Blinding of the study participants was not possible. Only 55 % of the participants completed the follow-up at six months.
Conclusions
The intervention was not effective in improving depression status or diet quality, in contrast to previous nutrition interventions for people with depression.