Nutrition-focused group intervention was not superior to social support in the treatment of depression: A randomized controlled trial with a strength-based counseling approach

Q3 Psychology
Aino Kipfer , Tiina Laatikainen , Timo Partonen , Johanna Roponen , Outi Nuutinen , Marja-Leena Lamidi
{"title":"Nutrition-focused group intervention was not superior to social support in the treatment of depression: A randomized controlled trial with a strength-based counseling approach","authors":"Aino Kipfer ,&nbsp;Tiina Laatikainen ,&nbsp;Timo Partonen ,&nbsp;Johanna Roponen ,&nbsp;Outi Nuutinen ,&nbsp;Marja-Leena Lamidi","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Depression is a public health challenge, negatively affecting health and work ability. While an association between diet and depression is recognized, only a few randomized controlled trials have been published on the impact of diet counseling on clinical depression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an 8-week randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a strength-based, motivational nutrition group intervention on symptoms of depression among individuals with a moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Participants (<em>n</em> = 93) were recruited from their healthcare units (<em>n</em> = 13) in Kuopio and Siilinjärvi, Eastern Finland, and randomized into the intervention or control arm. Both arms attended six group sessions. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Index of Diet Quality (IDQ), the Assessment of Quality of Life – 8D (AQoL-8D), and a work ability indicator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In both groups, there were only non-significant improvements in depression symptoms, diet quality, quality of life, and work ability at 8 weeks and 6 months. Based on the AQoL subscales, mental health significantly improved in the intervention but not in the control group. There were, however, no significant differences between the groups in any outcomes. The results were similar at 8 weeks and 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Blinding of the study participants was not possible. Only 55 % of the participants completed the follow-up at six months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The intervention was not effective in improving depression status or diet quality, in contrast to previous nutrition interventions for people with depression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Depression is a public health challenge, negatively affecting health and work ability. While an association between diet and depression is recognized, only a few randomized controlled trials have been published on the impact of diet counseling on clinical depression.

Methods

We conducted an 8-week randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a strength-based, motivational nutrition group intervention on symptoms of depression among individuals with a moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Participants (n = 93) were recruited from their healthcare units (n = 13) in Kuopio and Siilinjärvi, Eastern Finland, and randomized into the intervention or control arm. Both arms attended six group sessions. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Index of Diet Quality (IDQ), the Assessment of Quality of Life – 8D (AQoL-8D), and a work ability indicator.

Results

In both groups, there were only non-significant improvements in depression symptoms, diet quality, quality of life, and work ability at 8 weeks and 6 months. Based on the AQoL subscales, mental health significantly improved in the intervention but not in the control group. There were, however, no significant differences between the groups in any outcomes. The results were similar at 8 weeks and 6 months.

Limitations

Blinding of the study participants was not possible. Only 55 % of the participants completed the follow-up at six months.

Conclusions

The intervention was not effective in improving depression status or diet quality, in contrast to previous nutrition interventions for people with depression.

Abstract Image

以营养为重点的群体干预在治疗抑郁症方面并不优于社会支持:一项基于力量咨询方法的随机对照试验
抑郁症是一项公共卫生挑战,对健康和工作能力产生负面影响。虽然饮食和抑郁症之间的联系已经得到承认,但关于饮食咨询对临床抑郁症的影响,只有少数随机对照试验发表。方法:我们进行了一项为期8周的随机对照试验,以检验以力量为基础的动机性营养组干预对中度至重度抑郁症患者抑郁症状的有效性。参与者(n = 93)从芬兰东部Kuopio和Siilinjärvi的医疗保健单位(n = 13)招募,并随机分为干预组或对照组。两组都参加了六次小组会议。采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、饮食质量指数(IDQ)、生活质量评估-8D (aql -8D)和工作能力指标对基线、8周和6个月的结果进行评估。结果两组患者在8周和6个月时抑郁症状、饮食质量、生活质量和工作能力均无显著改善。基于AQoL分量表,干预组的心理健康显著改善,而对照组则无显著改善。然而,两组之间在任何结果上都没有显著差异。8周和6个月时的结果相似。局限性:不可能对研究参与者进行盲法。只有55%的参与者在六个月后完成了随访。结论与以往针对抑郁症患者的营养干预相比,该干预在改善抑郁状态或饮食质量方面没有效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信