Passive satellite hourly precipitation estimation over mainland China by combining cloud and meteorological parameters

IF 4.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Sihang Xu , Jiming Li , Jia Li , Deyu Wen , Miao Lei , Yuan Wang , Jianping Huang
{"title":"Passive satellite hourly precipitation estimation over mainland China by combining cloud and meteorological parameters","authors":"Sihang Xu ,&nbsp;Jiming Li ,&nbsp;Jia Li ,&nbsp;Deyu Wen ,&nbsp;Miao Lei ,&nbsp;Yuan Wang ,&nbsp;Jianping Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-quality satellite quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) is crucial for theoretical studies and disaster monitoring. However, it remains unclear which information is effective or relatively less valuable. Accurately eliminating ineffective variables and applying effective ones as predictors can further enhance the accuracy and computational efficiency for QPE. In this study, an hourly QPE algorithm was developed using three machine learning (ML) models, including Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM. We focused on obtaining high-precision precipitation estimations and further analyzing the contribution of different input variables. Sensitivity experiments revealed that satellite visible channels and cloud properties are key factors for accurate QPE. In contrast, information provided solely by infrared channels and meteorological variables is relatively limited. Among three ML models, LightGBM achieved the best QPE, and was comparable to, or even slightly better than GPM IMERG, which may be attributed to its incorporation of more effective variables and training with ground rain gauge. However, it sometimes underestimates heavy precipitation compared to GPM IMERG, probably due to few training samples and saturation of satellite spectral signals. The analysis of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) indicates that QPE are more sensitive to cloud properties (e.g., cloud water path), but some meteorological factors, such as relative humidity at different pressure levels are becoming more important as the environment becomes drier. Additionally, the performance of ML model and GPM IMERG deeply relies on cloud type. These findings are expected to provide valuable references for the construction of future satellite QPE algorithms in terms of feature selection and data processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8600,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Research","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 108112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809525002042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality satellite quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) is crucial for theoretical studies and disaster monitoring. However, it remains unclear which information is effective or relatively less valuable. Accurately eliminating ineffective variables and applying effective ones as predictors can further enhance the accuracy and computational efficiency for QPE. In this study, an hourly QPE algorithm was developed using three machine learning (ML) models, including Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM. We focused on obtaining high-precision precipitation estimations and further analyzing the contribution of different input variables. Sensitivity experiments revealed that satellite visible channels and cloud properties are key factors for accurate QPE. In contrast, information provided solely by infrared channels and meteorological variables is relatively limited. Among three ML models, LightGBM achieved the best QPE, and was comparable to, or even slightly better than GPM IMERG, which may be attributed to its incorporation of more effective variables and training with ground rain gauge. However, it sometimes underestimates heavy precipitation compared to GPM IMERG, probably due to few training samples and saturation of satellite spectral signals. The analysis of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) indicates that QPE are more sensitive to cloud properties (e.g., cloud water path), but some meteorological factors, such as relative humidity at different pressure levels are becoming more important as the environment becomes drier. Additionally, the performance of ML model and GPM IMERG deeply relies on cloud type. These findings are expected to provide valuable references for the construction of future satellite QPE algorithms in terms of feature selection and data processing.
结合云和气象参数估算中国大陆无源卫星逐时降水
高质量的卫星降水定量估算对理论研究和灾害监测具有重要意义。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些信息是有效的,哪些信息价值相对较低。准确剔除无效变量,采用有效变量作为预测变量,可以进一步提高QPE的预测精度和计算效率。在本研究中,使用三种机器学习(ML)模型,包括Random Forest, XGBoost和LightGBM,开发了每小时QPE算法。我们的重点是获得高精度的降水估计,并进一步分析不同输入变量的贡献。灵敏度实验表明,卫星可见信道和云层特性是影响QPE精度的关键因素。相比之下,仅由红外通道和气象变量提供的信息相对有限。在三个ML模型中,LightGBM达到了最好的QPE,与GPM IMERG相当,甚至略优于GPM IMERG,这可能是由于它纳入了更有效的变量,并与地面雨量计进行了训练。然而,与GPM IMERG相比,它有时会低估强降水,这可能是由于训练样本较少和卫星频谱信号饱和所致。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析表明,QPE对云特性(如云水路径)更为敏感,但随着环境变得更加干燥,一些气象因素(如不同压力水平下的相对湿度)变得更加重要。此外,ML模型和GPM IMERG的性能严重依赖于云类型。这些发现有望为未来卫星QPE算法在特征选择和数据处理方面的构建提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Research
Atmospheric Research 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
460
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信