Distinctiveness of the sphenoid sinuses for human identification: A cone beam computed tomography study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Michel Lopes da Silva , Lívia Graziele Rodrigues , Kris Fellipe do Nascimento Santos , Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim , Ana Bheatriz Souza Oliveira , Rhonan Ferreira Silva
{"title":"Distinctiveness of the sphenoid sinuses for human identification: A cone beam computed tomography study","authors":"Michel Lopes da Silva ,&nbsp;Lívia Graziele Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Kris Fellipe do Nascimento Santos ,&nbsp;Mayara Barbosa Viandelli Mundim ,&nbsp;Ana Bheatriz Souza Oliveira ,&nbsp;Rhonan Ferreira Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human identification in complex cases, such as charred skeletal remains and advanced decomposition, requires reliable methods to associate the identity of a missing person with an unidentified body. Among the different types of human identification, radiological methods are effective as they generally allow qualitative and quantitative analysis of anatomical, pathological, and therapeutic peculiarities, whose combination of information forms a unique set of characteristics that can lead to a positive identification. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the distinctiveness of the sphenoid sinuses, and to classify and identify their morphological patterns in the studied population, with potential application for human identification. This retrospective observational study analyzed 91 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of Brazilian individuals (34 males; 57 females) over the age of 25 years. A qualitative analysis was performed focusing on the sphenoid sinuses' morphological pattern, as well as their presence, number, and position in sagittal and axial CBCT slices. The sphenoid sinuses were present in 100 % of cases, 48.3 % had one septum, 30.7 % had two septa, and 20.8 % had three intersphenoidal septa. Septa type 3 (in the midline) were the most common (42.9 %; n = 39), while type 4 (slightly left to the midline) were the least frequent (3.3 %; n = 3). In the sagittal section analysis, post-sellar type (IVa) septa were the most frequent (50.5 %; n = 46), while the pre-sellar type septa were the least frequent (14.3 %; n = 13). The turbinate pattern (type I) was not detected in this study. From an anatomical point of view, great morphological and dimensional variability were found between the sinuses. It was possible to observe qualitative and quantitative morphological differences that allow the individualization of the sphenoid sinus, which can support human identification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 112456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825000945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human identification in complex cases, such as charred skeletal remains and advanced decomposition, requires reliable methods to associate the identity of a missing person with an unidentified body. Among the different types of human identification, radiological methods are effective as they generally allow qualitative and quantitative analysis of anatomical, pathological, and therapeutic peculiarities, whose combination of information forms a unique set of characteristics that can lead to a positive identification. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the distinctiveness of the sphenoid sinuses, and to classify and identify their morphological patterns in the studied population, with potential application for human identification. This retrospective observational study analyzed 91 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of Brazilian individuals (34 males; 57 females) over the age of 25 years. A qualitative analysis was performed focusing on the sphenoid sinuses' morphological pattern, as well as their presence, number, and position in sagittal and axial CBCT slices. The sphenoid sinuses were present in 100 % of cases, 48.3 % had one septum, 30.7 % had two septa, and 20.8 % had three intersphenoidal septa. Septa type 3 (in the midline) were the most common (42.9 %; n = 39), while type 4 (slightly left to the midline) were the least frequent (3.3 %; n = 3). In the sagittal section analysis, post-sellar type (IVa) septa were the most frequent (50.5 %; n = 46), while the pre-sellar type septa were the least frequent (14.3 %; n = 13). The turbinate pattern (type I) was not detected in this study. From an anatomical point of view, great morphological and dimensional variability were found between the sinuses. It was possible to observe qualitative and quantitative morphological differences that allow the individualization of the sphenoid sinus, which can support human identification.
人类识别蝶窦的独特性:锥束计算机断层扫描研究
在复杂的情况下,如烧焦的骨骼遗骸和深度分解,需要可靠的方法将失踪者的身份与身份不明的尸体联系起来。在不同类型的人体识别中,放射学方法是有效的,因为它们通常允许对解剖、病理和治疗特性进行定性和定量分析,这些信息的组合形成了一组独特的特征,可以导致积极的识别。在此背景下,本研究旨在评估蝶窦的独特性,并在研究人群中分类和识别其形态模式,并具有潜在的应用于人类识别。这项回顾性观察性研究分析了91个巴西个体的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描结果(34名男性;57名女性),年龄在25岁以上。我们对蝶窦的形态模式以及蝶窦在矢状和轴向CBCT切片上的存在、数量和位置进行了定性分析。100 %的病例存在蝶窦,48.3 %有一个鼻中隔,30.7 %有两个鼻中隔,20.8 %有三个蝶间鼻中隔。间隔3型(中线)最常见(42.9% %;N = 39),而4型(稍微偏左到中线)最不常见(3.3 %;n = 3)。矢状面分析中,鞍后型(IVa)间隔最常见(50.5 %;N = 46),而预售型鼻中隔发生率最低(14.3 %;n = 13)。本研究未发现甲骨型(I型)。从解剖学的角度来看,在鼻窦之间发现了巨大的形态和尺寸变化。有可能观察到定性和定量形态学差异,从而使蝶窦个体化,这可以支持人类的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信