{"title":"Twinning green and digital futures in waste management","authors":"Charlotte Benedix , Alena Bleicher , Lina Sofie Schöne , Diana Ayeh","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In waste management, a classic field of environmental governance, the political idea of “twinning” the green with the digital transition can be expected to gain performative power. To explore the question of how far this is the case and to what effect, we argue for a closer examination of enactments of and contestations around the twin transition policy discourse in daily practices of technology use. As a sensitizing concept, we use Mike Michael’s (2017) idea of the “ecology of futures” in order to help us explore ways and means by which digital and green futures are envisioned and become material in the technology-practice assemblages of a municipal waste management company in Germany. We identify three different “modes” of linking and decoupling these futures to and from each other. More precisely, we reveal how the “win-win” of a technology-mediated twinning policy is enacted, complemented, and even contested by other future visions at the company level. These are related to experimental playgrounds where, in their everyday routines, many workers do not refer to environmental goals at all. We conclude that considering such a plurality of perspectives may provide the basis for opening up and re-politicizing the debate around the twin transition. What role green visions of the future will play in this, however, remains open.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In waste management, a classic field of environmental governance, the political idea of “twinning” the green with the digital transition can be expected to gain performative power. To explore the question of how far this is the case and to what effect, we argue for a closer examination of enactments of and contestations around the twin transition policy discourse in daily practices of technology use. As a sensitizing concept, we use Mike Michael’s (2017) idea of the “ecology of futures” in order to help us explore ways and means by which digital and green futures are envisioned and become material in the technology-practice assemblages of a municipal waste management company in Germany. We identify three different “modes” of linking and decoupling these futures to and from each other. More precisely, we reveal how the “win-win” of a technology-mediated twinning policy is enacted, complemented, and even contested by other future visions at the company level. These are related to experimental playgrounds where, in their everyday routines, many workers do not refer to environmental goals at all. We conclude that considering such a plurality of perspectives may provide the basis for opening up and re-politicizing the debate around the twin transition. What role green visions of the future will play in this, however, remains open.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.