Equity in unilateral value chain policies: A monitoring framework for the EUDR and beyond

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Constance L. McDermott , Thomas Addoah , Tawiah Agyarko-Kwarteng , Rebecca Asare , Alex Assanvo , Mairon Bastos Lima , Helen Bellfield , Amanda Berlan , Sophia Carodenuto , Toby Gardner , Rachael D. Garrett , Caitlin Hafferty , Mark Hirons , Verina Ingram , Eric Mensah Kumeh , Joss Lyons-White , John Mason , Patrick Meyfroidt , Jasper Montana , Gustavo L.T. de Oliveira , Georg Winkel
{"title":"Equity in unilateral value chain policies: A monitoring framework for the EUDR and beyond","authors":"Constance L. McDermott ,&nbsp;Thomas Addoah ,&nbsp;Tawiah Agyarko-Kwarteng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Asare ,&nbsp;Alex Assanvo ,&nbsp;Mairon Bastos Lima ,&nbsp;Helen Bellfield ,&nbsp;Amanda Berlan ,&nbsp;Sophia Carodenuto ,&nbsp;Toby Gardner ,&nbsp;Rachael D. Garrett ,&nbsp;Caitlin Hafferty ,&nbsp;Mark Hirons ,&nbsp;Verina Ingram ,&nbsp;Eric Mensah Kumeh ,&nbsp;Joss Lyons-White ,&nbsp;John Mason ,&nbsp;Patrick Meyfroidt ,&nbsp;Jasper Montana ,&nbsp;Gustavo L.T. de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Georg Winkel","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unilateral value chain policies have recently emerged as a key strategy of international land use governance. They're part of a broader trend towards trade-based environmental policies, from corporate due diligence to sustainability certification and trade moratoria, that has been critiqued for reinforcing inequities in global trade. Such critique has been heightened by the current rise of unilateralism, whereby states impose environmental rules on imported commodities. Debates have ensued over the political legitimacy of unilateralism, the unequal distribution of its socio-economic impacts, and the need to safeguard local producers and communities.</div><div>This paper informs these debates by developing and applying a framework for monitoring equity across scales and phases of the policy process. The framework is applied to the 2023 EU Deforestation-free Regulation (EUDR), which aims to stop EU imports of commodities linked to deforestation. We find that EUDR policy references equity as a desired outcome, but excludes affected actors from the design process. Drawing on the case of cocoa in Ghana, we identify diverse potential impacts on smallholder farmers and economies. Opportunities for the EUDR to improve equity include embedding non-EU stakeholders in international decision-making processes, enhanced and equitable partnerships with producing countries and major investments in farmer support. The paper concludes by providing an equity checklist and agenda for monitoring progress, adaptable to a wide range of unilateral and trade-based policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unilateral value chain policies have recently emerged as a key strategy of international land use governance. They're part of a broader trend towards trade-based environmental policies, from corporate due diligence to sustainability certification and trade moratoria, that has been critiqued for reinforcing inequities in global trade. Such critique has been heightened by the current rise of unilateralism, whereby states impose environmental rules on imported commodities. Debates have ensued over the political legitimacy of unilateralism, the unequal distribution of its socio-economic impacts, and the need to safeguard local producers and communities.
This paper informs these debates by developing and applying a framework for monitoring equity across scales and phases of the policy process. The framework is applied to the 2023 EU Deforestation-free Regulation (EUDR), which aims to stop EU imports of commodities linked to deforestation. We find that EUDR policy references equity as a desired outcome, but excludes affected actors from the design process. Drawing on the case of cocoa in Ghana, we identify diverse potential impacts on smallholder farmers and economies. Opportunities for the EUDR to improve equity include embedding non-EU stakeholders in international decision-making processes, enhanced and equitable partnerships with producing countries and major investments in farmer support. The paper concludes by providing an equity checklist and agenda for monitoring progress, adaptable to a wide range of unilateral and trade-based policies.
单边价值链政策中的公平:EUDR及以后的监测框架
单边价值链政策最近成为国际土地利用治理的一项关键战略。它们是以贸易为基础的环境政策的更广泛趋势的一部分,从企业尽职调查到可持续性认证和贸易暂停,这些政策被批评为加剧了全球贸易中的不平等。当前单边主义的兴起加剧了这种批评,即各国对进口商品施加环境规定。随后就单边主义的政治合法性、其社会经济影响的不平等分配以及保护当地生产者和社区的必要性进行了辩论。本文通过开发和应用一个框架来监测政策过程的各个规模和阶段的公平性,从而为这些辩论提供信息。该框架适用于2023年欧盟无森林砍伐条例(EUDR),该条例旨在阻止欧盟进口与森林砍伐有关的商品。我们发现EUDR政策将公平作为期望的结果,但将受影响的参与者排除在设计过程之外。以加纳的可可为例,我们确定了对小农和经济的各种潜在影响。《宣言》改善公平的机会包括将非欧盟利益攸关方纳入国际决策进程,加强与生产国的公平伙伴关系,以及在支持农民方面进行重大投资。该文件最后提供了一份公平清单和监测进展的议程,适用于广泛的单边和基于贸易的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信