{"title":"Assembling solar energy, agriculture, and shorebirds: Coexisting energy landscapes with typhoons and wetlands","authors":"Chihyuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy (RE) installations are indispensable in achieving net-zero climate targets, yet the energy landscape is not solely constituted by technological artefacts. This assembling process, influenced by cultural, historical, and material conditions, is equally significant. This paper examines two empirical cases in Taiwan to illustrate the importance of local experience, sensory elements, materiality, and non-human agency in designing and siting photovoltaic installations. Drawing upon the Science and technology studies approaches of ‘co-production’ in sustainability transitions, ‘matters of concern’, and ‘ethno-epistemic assemblages’, the two case studies underline the necessity of iterative interactions between social-material concerns and RE technology designs. This paper suggests that RE technology should be considered a situated and responsive assemblage that is capable of resonating with multifaceted values. By documenting alterations in designs, material shapes, and co-created conservation plans devised in these projects, this paper provides insights for fostering a more flexible transition pathway, perceiving RE installations as fluid, adaptable assemblages that can coexist with and facilitate a more inclusive energy landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104061"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Renewable energy (RE) installations are indispensable in achieving net-zero climate targets, yet the energy landscape is not solely constituted by technological artefacts. This assembling process, influenced by cultural, historical, and material conditions, is equally significant. This paper examines two empirical cases in Taiwan to illustrate the importance of local experience, sensory elements, materiality, and non-human agency in designing and siting photovoltaic installations. Drawing upon the Science and technology studies approaches of ‘co-production’ in sustainability transitions, ‘matters of concern’, and ‘ethno-epistemic assemblages’, the two case studies underline the necessity of iterative interactions between social-material concerns and RE technology designs. This paper suggests that RE technology should be considered a situated and responsive assemblage that is capable of resonating with multifaceted values. By documenting alterations in designs, material shapes, and co-created conservation plans devised in these projects, this paper provides insights for fostering a more flexible transition pathway, perceiving RE installations as fluid, adaptable assemblages that can coexist with and facilitate a more inclusive energy landscape.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.