Impact of climate change on the nitrogen budget of a dairy farm in the Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarah J. Pogue , Marcos R.C. Cordeiro , Alan Rotz , Carson Li , Roland Kröbel , Karen A. Beauchemin , Derek Hunt , Shabtai Bittman
{"title":"Impact of climate change on the nitrogen budget of a dairy farm in the Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada","authors":"Sarah J. Pogue ,&nbsp;Marcos R.C. Cordeiro ,&nbsp;Alan Rotz ,&nbsp;Carson Li ,&nbsp;Roland Kröbel ,&nbsp;Karen A. Beauchemin ,&nbsp;Derek Hunt ,&nbsp;Shabtai Bittman","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>The dairy sector contributed $19.9 (CAD) billion to Canada's GDP in 2015, but the industry has come under increasing public scrutiny regarding its environmental and economic sustainability, particularly under climate change. The Fraser Valley region of British Columbia, Canada, a high-intensity dairy producing region, is projected to experience higher winter, spring and summer temperatures and increased precipitation, particularly in fall, with implications for nitrogen (N) cycling within agroecosystems, crop and livestock production.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to explore N flows in a Canadian dairy farm using a whole-farm partially process-based modelling approach to investigate the impacts of different climate and cropping scenarios on farm N inputs and outputs.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This study used farm data and the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) to assess: 1) N flows in an intensive, high-producing dairy farm in the Lower Fraser Valley with and without a winter double crop; and 2) farm production and N losses under two future climate scenarios based on medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios in the near future (NF, 2020–2045) and distant future (DF, 2050–2075).</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Across all scenarios, the N use efficiency of the farm (N exported in meat, milk and feed / N inputs) was between 31.4 % and 34.3 % (slightly higher with winter wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.)), indicating that about two-thirds of N imported as feed and fertilizer was lost to the environment or accumulated in the soil. In the NF and DF scenarios (without double crop), the largest increases related to manure NH<sub>3</sub>-N losses, which rose by 8.1 % (NF) and 19.4 % (DF) from housing; 15.7 % (NF) and 44.0 % (DF) from storage; and 3 % (NF) and 18.5 % (DF) following land application. Projected temperature increases also raised emissions from synthetic fertilizer. Other gaseous N emissions generally declined in the future, probably due to increased NH<sub>3</sub>-N losses, whereas leaching N losses increased slightly (0.5–1.6 %), probably due to higher projected summer and fall precipitation. The winter wheat double crop scenarios generally led to lower N losses via gaseous pathways and leaching/runoff compared with the baseline scenarios, attributable to more N capture by winter wheat.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>The apparent loss to surrounding water and air of at least two-thirds of the N imported to the farm highlights the urgent need for the implementation of a range of management strategies that can reduce overall N imports to the system and reduce losses of N inputs via volatilization, runoff and leaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 104333"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25000733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

The dairy sector contributed $19.9 (CAD) billion to Canada's GDP in 2015, but the industry has come under increasing public scrutiny regarding its environmental and economic sustainability, particularly under climate change. The Fraser Valley region of British Columbia, Canada, a high-intensity dairy producing region, is projected to experience higher winter, spring and summer temperatures and increased precipitation, particularly in fall, with implications for nitrogen (N) cycling within agroecosystems, crop and livestock production.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore N flows in a Canadian dairy farm using a whole-farm partially process-based modelling approach to investigate the impacts of different climate and cropping scenarios on farm N inputs and outputs.

METHODS

This study used farm data and the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) to assess: 1) N flows in an intensive, high-producing dairy farm in the Lower Fraser Valley with and without a winter double crop; and 2) farm production and N losses under two future climate scenarios based on medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios in the near future (NF, 2020–2045) and distant future (DF, 2050–2075).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Across all scenarios, the N use efficiency of the farm (N exported in meat, milk and feed / N inputs) was between 31.4 % and 34.3 % (slightly higher with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)), indicating that about two-thirds of N imported as feed and fertilizer was lost to the environment or accumulated in the soil. In the NF and DF scenarios (without double crop), the largest increases related to manure NH3-N losses, which rose by 8.1 % (NF) and 19.4 % (DF) from housing; 15.7 % (NF) and 44.0 % (DF) from storage; and 3 % (NF) and 18.5 % (DF) following land application. Projected temperature increases also raised emissions from synthetic fertilizer. Other gaseous N emissions generally declined in the future, probably due to increased NH3-N losses, whereas leaching N losses increased slightly (0.5–1.6 %), probably due to higher projected summer and fall precipitation. The winter wheat double crop scenarios generally led to lower N losses via gaseous pathways and leaching/runoff compared with the baseline scenarios, attributable to more N capture by winter wheat.

SIGNIFICANCE

The apparent loss to surrounding water and air of at least two-thirds of the N imported to the farm highlights the urgent need for the implementation of a range of management strategies that can reduce overall N imports to the system and reduce losses of N inputs via volatilization, runoff and leaching.

Abstract Image

气候变化对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省弗雷泽河谷奶牛场氮收支的影响
2015年,乳制品行业为加拿大的GDP贡献了199亿美元(加元),但该行业在环境和经济可持续性方面受到越来越多的公众监督,特别是在气候变化的背景下。加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的弗雷泽河谷地区是一个高强度的乳制品产区,预计冬季、春季和夏季气温将更高,降水将增加,尤其是在秋季,这将影响农业生态系统、作物和牲畜生产中的氮循环。本研究旨在利用基于整个农场部分过程的建模方法来研究加拿大奶牛场的氮流,以研究不同气候和种植情景对农场氮投入和产出的影响。方法本研究利用农场数据和综合农场系统模型(IFSM)来评估:1)下弗雷泽河谷一个集约化、高产的奶牛场在有无冬季双季作物的情况下的氮流;2)基于中(RCP4.5)和高(RCP8.5)排放情景的近未来(NF, 2020-2045)和远未来(DF, 2050-2075)两种未来气候情景下的农业生产和氮损失。结果与结论在所有情景下,该农场的氮利用效率(肉类、牛奶和饲料中输出的氮/输入氮)在31.4% ~ 34.3%之间(冬小麦略高),表明约有三分之二作为饲料和肥料输入的氮流失到环境中或积累在土壤中。在无双季的情况下,土壤肥力和土壤肥力分别增加了8.1% (NF)和19.4% (DF);15.7% (NF)和44.0% (DF)来自存储;在土地申请后,则分别占3% (NF)及18.5% (DF)。预计气温升高也会增加合成肥料的排放量。其他气态氮排放在未来普遍下降,可能是由于NH3-N损失增加,而淋溶氮损失略有增加(0.5 - 1.6%),可能是由于预计夏季和秋季降水较高。与基线情景相比,冬小麦双季情景通常导致通过气体途径和淋溶/径流的氮损失减少,这是由于冬小麦捕获了更多的氮。至少有三分之二的输入到农场的氮明显损失到周围的水和空气中,这突出表明迫切需要实施一系列管理策略,以减少系统的总氮输入,并减少通过挥发、径流和淋滤造成的氮输入损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信