“Everything is technology”: Examining technology access and use among returning citizens

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kaelyn Sanders
{"title":"“Everything is technology”: Examining technology access and use among returning citizens","authors":"Kaelyn Sanders","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research summaryDigital inequality is a barrier for returning citizens. Yet, much remains unknown about the specific issues they encounter. As the world continues to advance technologically, it is important that we understand returning citizens’ access to and use of technology and how it impacts their ability to reintegrate into society. Framed in the Digital Rehabilitation Model, the current study uses qualitative data from 28 returning citizens to explore their experiences with digital exclusion. Findings show that returning citizens have challenges accessing and using technology in several reentry areas.Policy implicationsThe study's results reflect returning citizens’ need for support to access and use technology for reentry purposes. Specifically, they need assistance with accessing computers and using technology for online job searching, education, and other personal needs. In addition, they also need education on how to maintain online safety. Policy recommendations are given for how correctional facilities can work with existing organizations and frameworks to increase returning citizens’ access to technology, the Internet, and digital skills programming prior to and after release from prison. In addition, concerns about how to maintain prison safety and security while increasing access to technology devices and the Internet are addressed.","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research summaryDigital inequality is a barrier for returning citizens. Yet, much remains unknown about the specific issues they encounter. As the world continues to advance technologically, it is important that we understand returning citizens’ access to and use of technology and how it impacts their ability to reintegrate into society. Framed in the Digital Rehabilitation Model, the current study uses qualitative data from 28 returning citizens to explore their experiences with digital exclusion. Findings show that returning citizens have challenges accessing and using technology in several reentry areas.Policy implicationsThe study's results reflect returning citizens’ need for support to access and use technology for reentry purposes. Specifically, they need assistance with accessing computers and using technology for online job searching, education, and other personal needs. In addition, they also need education on how to maintain online safety. Policy recommendations are given for how correctional facilities can work with existing organizations and frameworks to increase returning citizens’ access to technology, the Internet, and digital skills programming prior to and after release from prison. In addition, concerns about how to maintain prison safety and security while increasing access to technology devices and the Internet are addressed.
"一切都是技术":考察回国公民获取和使用技术的情况
研究摘要数字不平等是回返公民面临的障碍。然而,他们遇到的具体问题仍有很多不为人知之处。随着世界技术的不断进步,我们有必要了解回国公民获取和使用技术的情况,以及这对他们重新融入社会的能力有何影响。本研究以 "数字康复模式 "为框架,利用来自 28 位回归公民的定性数据,探讨他们被数字排斥的经历。研究结果表明,重返社会的公民在获取和使用多个重返社会领域的技术方面面临挑战。具体地说,他们需要在访问计算机和使用技术进行在线求职、教育和满足其他个人需求方面得到帮助。此外,他们还需要接受如何维护网络安全的教育。政策建议中提出了惩教机构如何与现有组织和框架合作,以增加回归公民在出狱前和出狱后使用技术、互联网和数字技能编程的机会。此外,还讨论了在增加技术设备和互联网使用的同时如何维护监狱安全和安保的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信