Mapping near-real-time soil moisture dynamics over Tasmania with transfer learning

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.5194/soil-11-287-2025
Marliana Tri Widyastuti, José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Mathew Webb, Muh Taufik, Darren Kidd
{"title":"Mapping near-real-time soil moisture dynamics over Tasmania with transfer learning","authors":"Marliana Tri Widyastuti, José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Mathew Webb, Muh Taufik, Darren Kidd","doi":"10.5194/soil-11-287-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Soil moisture, an essential parameter for hydroclimatic studies, exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability, which complicates its mapping at high spatiotemporal resolutions. Although current remote sensing products offer global estimates of soil moisture at fine temporal resolutions, they do so at a coarse spatial resolution. Deep learning (DL) techniques have recently been employed to produce high-resolution maps of various soil properties; however, these methods require substantial training data. This study sought to map daily soil moisture across Tasmania, Australia, at an 80 m resolution using a limited set of training data. We assessed three modeling strategies: DL models calibrated using an Australian dataset (51 411 observation points), models calibrated using the Tasmanian dataset (9825 observation points), and a transfer learning technique that transferred information from the Australian models to Tasmania using region-specific data. We also evaluated two DL approaches, i.e., multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM). The models included the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) dataset, weather data, an elevation map, land cover, and multilevel soil property maps as inputs to generate soil moisture at the surface (0–30 cm) and subsurface (30–60 cm) layers. Results showed that (1) models calibrated from the Australian dataset performed worse than Tasmanian models regardless of the type of DL approaches; (2) Tasmanian models, calibrated solely using local data, resulted in shortcomings in predicting soil moisture; and (3) transfer learning exhibited remarkable performance improvements (error reductions of up to 45 % and a 50 % increase in correlation) and resolved the drawbacks of the two previous models. The LSTM models with transfer learning had the highest overall performance with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.07 m3 m−3 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.77 across stations for the surface layer as well as MAE=0.07m3m-3 and r=0.69 for the subsurface layer. The fine-resolution soil moisture maps captured the detailed landscape variation as well as temporal variation according to four distinct seasons in Tasmania. The models were then applied to generate daily soil moisture maps of Tasmania, integrated into a near-real-time monitoring system to assist agricultural decision-making.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-287-2025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Soil moisture, an essential parameter for hydroclimatic studies, exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability, which complicates its mapping at high spatiotemporal resolutions. Although current remote sensing products offer global estimates of soil moisture at fine temporal resolutions, they do so at a coarse spatial resolution. Deep learning (DL) techniques have recently been employed to produce high-resolution maps of various soil properties; however, these methods require substantial training data. This study sought to map daily soil moisture across Tasmania, Australia, at an 80 m resolution using a limited set of training data. We assessed three modeling strategies: DL models calibrated using an Australian dataset (51 411 observation points), models calibrated using the Tasmanian dataset (9825 observation points), and a transfer learning technique that transferred information from the Australian models to Tasmania using region-specific data. We also evaluated two DL approaches, i.e., multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM). The models included the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) dataset, weather data, an elevation map, land cover, and multilevel soil property maps as inputs to generate soil moisture at the surface (0–30 cm) and subsurface (30–60 cm) layers. Results showed that (1) models calibrated from the Australian dataset performed worse than Tasmanian models regardless of the type of DL approaches; (2) Tasmanian models, calibrated solely using local data, resulted in shortcomings in predicting soil moisture; and (3) transfer learning exhibited remarkable performance improvements (error reductions of up to 45 % and a 50 % increase in correlation) and resolved the drawbacks of the two previous models. The LSTM models with transfer learning had the highest overall performance with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.07 m3 m−3 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.77 across stations for the surface layer as well as MAE=0.07m3m-3 and r=0.69 for the subsurface layer. The fine-resolution soil moisture maps captured the detailed landscape variation as well as temporal variation according to four distinct seasons in Tasmania. The models were then applied to generate daily soil moisture maps of Tasmania, integrated into a near-real-time monitoring system to assist agricultural decision-making.
利用迁移学习绘制塔斯马尼亚岛近实时土壤湿度动态
摘要。土壤湿度是水文气候研究的一个重要参数,具有相当大的时空变异性,这使得高时空分辨率的土壤湿度制图变得复杂。虽然目前的遥感产品以精细的时间分辨率提供全球土壤湿度估计,但它们是在粗糙的空间分辨率上这样做的。深度学习(DL)技术最近被用于制作各种土壤特性的高分辨率地图;然而,这些方法需要大量的训练数据。这项研究试图利用一组有限的训练数据,以80米的分辨率绘制澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州的每日土壤湿度图。我们评估了三种建模策略:使用澳大利亚数据集(51,411个观测点)校准的深度学习模型,使用塔斯马尼亚数据集(9825个观测点)校准的模型,以及使用区域特定数据将信息从澳大利亚模型转移到塔斯马尼亚的迁移学习技术。我们还评估了两种深度学习方法,即多层感知器(MLP)和长短期记忆(LSTM)。这些模型包括土壤水分主动被动(SMAP)数据集、天气数据、高程图、土地覆盖和多层土壤属性图作为输入,以生成地表(0-30厘米)和地下(30-60厘米)层的土壤水分。结果表明:(1)无论DL方法的类型如何,从澳大利亚数据集校准的模型的表现都不如塔斯马尼亚模型;(2)塔斯马尼亚模式仅使用当地数据进行校准,在预测土壤湿度方面存在不足;(3)迁移学习表现出显著的性能改进(误差减少高达45%,相关性增加50%),并解决了前两种模型的缺点。具有迁移学习的LSTM模型的综合性能最高,表层的平均绝对误差(MAE)为0.07m3m-3,站间相关系数(r)为0.77,次表层的MAE=0.07m3m-3, r=0.69。高分辨率的土壤湿度图捕捉了塔斯马尼亚州四个不同季节的详细景观变化和时间变化。然后应用这些模型生成塔斯马尼亚州的每日土壤湿度图,并将其集成到近乎实时的监测系统中,以协助农业决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信